:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Colin-Jost-Michael-Che-SNL-122125-76176b3d75db4fb883c9424f656d0f46.jpg "Colin-Jost-Michael-Che-SNL-122125-76176b3d75db4fb883c9424f656d0f46.jpg")
When Michael Che stood at the Weekend Update desk and uttered words that seemed to violate every modern sensibility of late-night television, the reaction wasn’t just shock—it was a collective, bewildered exhale. The joke, which touched on the most sensitive and grotesque aspects of the Michael Jackson legacy, was, on paper, indefensible. Che delivered lines suggesting the late pop star was “right” to engage in his well-documented history of misconduct, even adding a layer of personal, fabricated trauma to the bit.
For a casual viewer, it was a moment of profound discomfort. But for those who understand the mechanics of the SNL Weekend Update joke swap, the offense wasn’t the point. The joke wasn’t about Michael Jackson, nor was it about Che’s supposed personal history. Instead, the true gag lay in the visible, palpable anguish of the man delivering the lines. In this specific corner of Saturday Night Live, the joke is not the punchline; the discomfort of the comedian is.
This biannual tradition, where co-anchors Michael Che and Colin Jost write “cold” material for one another to deliver without warning, has become a cornerstone of the program’s modern era. The goal is simple yet high-stakes: to make your partner look as crass, offensive, or fundamentally foolish as possible. By weaponizing the very things that make an audience recoil, the two men have turned the “awful joke” into a sophisticated study of social permission and interpersonal trust.
The Origin of the “Bad” Joke
The evolution of this tradition was born not from a desire to be edgy, but from a moment of comedic failure. As Che noted in an interview with comedian Mike Birbiglia, the concept emerged after a series of jokes written for a standard dress rehearsal failed to land. One particularly “groaner” moment was met with a literal, vocal rejection from a woman in the audience shouting “no.”
Rather than retreating from the failure, Che and Jost decided to lean into it. They experimented with recycling those same failed, “bad” jokes, but with a twist: they would have the other person deliver them. They discovered that by acknowledging the inherent bad taste of the material through their own visible discomfort, they were actually giving the audience permission to laugh. The laughter wasn’t an endorsement of the joke’s content, but a release of the tension created by the absurdity of the situation.
This realization transformed the stunt from a desperate attempt to salvage failed material into a deliberate piece of performance art. It shifted the focus from the content of the joke to the relationship between the performers. The audience isn’t laughing at the joke; they are laughing at the spectacle of two professionals being forced to navigate the social minefield of “wrong” humor in real-time.
The Architecture of the Swap
The tradition functions through a deep, almost surgical understanding of each performer’s public persona. Because the two men have worked together for over a decade, they know exactly which buttons to press to create the maximum amount of friction.
- Targeting the “Straight Man”: When writing for Colin Jost, Che leans into Jost’s reputation as the polished, straight-laced, and somewhat conventional anchor. He crafts jokes that make Jost appear to harbor prejudices or lean into uncomfortable, “uncool” tropes.
- Targeting the “Wild Card”: Conversely, when Jost writes for Che, he often attempts to paint Che as a louche, morally ambiguous, or sexually deviant figure, utilizing the shock value of Che’s more deadpan delivery.
The results are often polarizing. Past highlights include Jost being forced to navigate the height of the Kendrick Lamar and Drake feud by calling Lamar “the biggest bitch of them all,” and Che writing a joke about Jost’s wife, Scarlett Johansson, that was so extreme it required a formal on-air apology. These moments are designed to go viral, but their longevity is rooted in the perceived authenticity of the “struggle” on screen.
Comedy vs. Cruelty: The Roast Distinction
To understand why the Weekend Update swap works, it is helpful to contrast it with more traditional “edgy” comedy environments, such as the recent Netflix roast of Kevin Hart. In high-pressure roast settings, the humor often relies on a series of aggressive, high-octane exchanges intended to demonstrate who can be the most callous in the room.
In one instance during the Hart roast, a back-and-forth between Shane Gillis and Chelsea Handler involved sharp jabs regarding Handler’s social circles and Gillis’s own controversial history. While these exchanges are part of the roast genre, they often lack a sense of fraternity. The environment can feel less like a shared joke and more like a demonstration of professional hostility, where the goal is to “win” the exchange by being the most biting.
The SNL tradition operates on the opposite principle. While the jokes themselves may be “vicious,” the underlying intent is fraternal. The “one-upmanship” between Che and Jost is a manifestation of affection. They are not trying to destroy one another; they are testing the boundaries of their friendship and their professional ability to handle the unthinkable. The humor is subversive because it uses the tools of cruelty to reinforce a bond of trust.
The Human Element
The distinction between “edgy” humor and “affectionate” discomfort was most clearly visible during a recent segment involving a joke about Ye (formerly Kanye West). After being forced to deliver a line regarding the artist’s controversial political stances, Jost attempted to atone for the bit by offering to “sacrifice” his hair to a barber on set.
As the barber prepared to use the clippers, the “bit” briefly dissolved. Che, reacting with what appeared to be genuine concern, intervened to stop the haircut, telling Jost, “Man, you are the greatest comedian of all time.” In that moment, the artifice of the joke swap fell away, revealing the reality of the relationship. It was a reminder that the entire exercise—the offensive jokes, the staged discomfort, the viral moments—is built on a foundation of mutual respect.
As Saturday Night Live continues to navigate an increasingly sensitive cultural landscape, the Che-Jost tradition provides a unique case study in how comedy can remain provocative without becoming purely nihilistic. By making the teller the target, they have found a way to explore the boundaries of the “unacceptable” while keeping the humanity of the performers intact.
The next iteration of this tradition is expected to occur during the show’s upcoming seasonal transitions. For those interested in the evolving landscape of late-night satire, the upcoming episodes will likely serve as the next checkpoint for this ongoing social experiment.
Do you think the context of friendship justifies the use of offensive humor in comedy? We invite you to share your thoughts in the comments below.
