Title: “Mamanna: A Film That Explores Caste Disparities and Political Compromises”
In the recently released film “Mamanna,” directed by Mari Selvaraj, the audience delves into the world of caste disparities and political compromises within political parties that claim to fight for social justice. The movie focuses on the story of MLA Mamannan and his son Athiveeran, played by Vadivel and Udhayanidhi Stalin, respectively. The film sheds light on the challenges they face in their fight against dominant caste power and the consequences of their actions.
Athiveeran, who runs a martial arts training school, joins forces with his college friend Leela, portrayed by Keerthy Suresh, to conduct free education classes in their community. However, their efforts are met with opposition from Rathnavelu, the district secretary of the paternal party. Rathnavelu’s brother, who owns a coaching center, thwarts Leela’s endeavors, leading to a violent conflict between the two sides.
In an attempt to reconcile, Rathnavelu invites Athiveeran and his father to a meeting. However, the clash between Rathnavelu and Athiveeran takes an unexpected turn, becoming an internal party issue. As a result, Rathnavelu leaves the ruling party and joins the opposition party, vowing to defeat Mamannan in the upcoming elections.
The film explores whether Mamannan emerges victorious despite Rathnavelu’s betrayal and what ultimately happens to the clash between Rathnavelu and Athiveeran. Director Mari Selvaraj addresses caste inequalities and the compromises made for political gains, showing that violence is not glorified, but rather a response to oppression.
The film commendably emphasizes the importance of utilizing opportunities provided by the Constitution and following a democratic path to achieve the liberation of oppressed individuals. It also highlights the presence of egalitarian-minded people within the dominant society.
While “Mamanna” offers powerful and thought-provoking moments, the overall screenplay is deemed weak by some critics. Several scenes unfold slowly, and the election campaign-related sequences prove tiresome, diminishing the intensity of Rathnavelu’s character.
Although Athiveeran delivers important political lines, the backdrop of his character is not sufficiently established for the audience to fully grasp their significance. The film could have delved deeper into the contradictions and the bond that transcends them between the retaliatory hero and his patient father-in-law, providing a stronger emotional connection.
The performances in the film are praiseworthy, with Udhayanidhi Stalin effectively portraying the passionate son fighting for his father’s rights. Vadivelu, a well-known comedian, captivates the audience with a different facet of his acting talent. Fahadh Fazil, Lal, Geetha Kailasam, and Keerthy Suresh seize their respective roles and deliver compelling performances. AR Rahman’s background score perfectly captures the emotions of the scenes, although the songs leave a lackluster impression. Cinematographer Theni Iswar artfully captures the story and plot.
Despite its screenplay flaws, “Mamanna” deserves recognition for providing hope that societal inequalities can be overcome and improved through dedicated democratic means. The film serves as a reminder that the fight for social justice requires perseverance and unwavering determination.