NFL Tactics: Kubiak & Seahawks’ Game Plan | L’intercetto.it

by liam.oconnor - Sports Editor

Rams Defensive Adjustments Exploited in Recent Game, Leading to Scoring Opportunities

A shift in defensive strategy and critical breakdowns in coverage allowed opponents to capitalize on vulnerabilities, resulting in a critically important scoring differential. The Rams’ defence, initially configured with a four-man “Boundary†and three-man “Field†alignment, underwent a mid-game adjustment that ultimately proved problematic.

Initial Defensive Setup and Tactical Shift

The Rams began the game employing a “Quarters†(zone-match) scheme on both sides of the field. This involved a strategic distribution of defenders, with four players positioned on the “Boundary†— described as a gray quadrilateral — and three on the “Field,†a grey triangle formation. A key adjustment saw the team reverse this distribution by repositioning Landman (#53), tasking him with covering the “low†routes of receiver #11.

Did you know?-The “Boundary” and “Field” designations refer to the areas of the football field relative to the sidelines.The Boundary is closer to the sidelines, while the Field is the wider, central area.

Coverage breakdown Leads to Touchdowns

This tactical shift,however,created openings in the secondary. Cornerback Durant (#14), operating in “Man Outside Deep – MOD†mode, was assigned to contain the deep routes of wide receiver Shaheed (#22). Concurrently, safety Curl (#3) was expected to provide support to Landman against the vertical routes of Smith-Njigba.

According to analysis of the game footage, a crucial misread by the Rams’ secondary allowed for a significant play. “Both Durant and Curl…concentrate on Shaheed’s ‘Post,’ ignoring the ‘Corner’ of #11, leaving it ‘wide open’ directly in ‘End zone’,†a source close to the team explained. This resulted in a 14-yard touchdown for the opposing team.

The momentum continued to shift as a subsequent touchdown, attributed to a “rather serious mistake†by the Rams’ “Special Team†during the opening drive of the third quarter, extended the lead to “+11” in favor of the home team.

Pro tip-Zone-match coverage, like the “Quarters” scheme, requires constant communication between defenders to adjust to receiver routes and prevent mismatches.

offensive Response and Continued Defensive Challenges

The Rams’ offense, spearheaded by the Stafford-Adams-Parkinson trio, managed to narrow the gap to “+4.” Though, the opposing team quickly responded with a score from veteran receiver Kupp.

on a “3&9†situation, quarterback Darnold exploited the altered defensive alignment — specifically, the extra attacker on the “Field†— by completing a pass to the “Flat†area. This play put defenders Lake (#37) and McCreary (#25) in a difficult position. “OC Kubiak†orchestrated a play that “stretched†Lake vertically due to Smith-Njigba’s (#11) “corner†route, while simultaneously forcing McCreary to decide between covering Smith-Njigba or supporting Curl on Shaheed’s “Seam†route (#22).

This strategic maneuvering highlights the complexities of modern football and the critical importance of defensive adjustments. The Rams’ experiance serves as a cautionary tale about the potential consequences of miscommunication and tactical vulnerabilities.

Reader question-How much does play-calling influence a defense’s ability to react to in-game adjustments? What are yoru thoughts?

You may also like

Leave a Comment