2024-04-07 09:07:46
In the United States, the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) has signed a settlement agreement on ivermectin. The FDA will have to remove all its posts and directives encouraging people to stop prescribing ivermectin to prevent and treat Covid-10. In Germany, Multipola Magazine has done numerous revelations on the management of the pandemic, it is the United Kingdom’s turn to shine once again in the controversy surrounding vaccines.
It is therefore after numerous articles on the unestimated risks associated with mRNA vaccines that the British watchdog accuses Pfizer of “ discredit » on the industry. Indeed, she believes that the company has “ violated the regulatory code five timesnotably by promoting unlicensed medicines » reports an article from the Telegraph this April 6, 2024. Pfizer is therefore accused by the British regulator of “ discredit ” on the industry after its top executives used social media to promote an “unlicensed” covid vaccine.
The decision was taken by the pharmaceutical watchdog (Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA)) and relates to a complaint about a message posted on X in November 2020 by senior Pfizer executives. The latter allegedly misused social media to misleadingly and illegally promote the Pfizer vaccine.
In 2020, Dr. Berkeley Philips, medical director of Pfizer UK, shared a message on X from a Pfizer employee in the United States which said: “ Our vaccine candidate is 95% effective in preventing covid-19 and 94% effective in people over 65 years old. We will submit all our data to the health authorities in a few days. Thank you to all of our trial volunteers and to everyone who is tirelessly fighting this pandemic.” Four other Pfizer employees, including one in a high position, published the same message.
The regulator added that the
« social media post had resulted in an ‘unlicensed medicine being proactively disseminated on Twitter to healthcare professionals and members of the public in the UK ».
According to the Telegraph, the Pfizer company, through a spokesperson, declared “ fully recognize and accept the issues highlighted by this PMCPA decision » and is « deeply sorry “. The article fails to point out that Pfizer made billions in profits following the marketing of this drug, investors have not yet said they are sorry! However, Pfizer goes further by explaining that “ Pfizer UK has a comprehensive policy on personal use of social media in relation to Pfizer’s business which prohibits colleagues from interacting with social media relating to Pfizer medicines and vaccines – supported by information sessions and training for staff. » This declaration will therefore have to be put into perspective to assess how employees, whether or not motivated by the company’s performance, have violated the limits of normality and security of communication on social networks.
Pfizer also added “ The personal use of social media by employees of the UK pharmaceutical industry in the course of business activities is a challenge for pharmaceutical companies, in which we continue to take all appropriate measures that could reasonably be expected from a pharmaceutical company. »
Another way of saying after the fact, We are sorrywe will investigate and change our practices.
Is it not good ethical and medical practice to “ prevent rather than cure » ?
Pfizer has already been singled out numerous times by regulators – Can we really say that this communication is “accidental and unintentional”?
Pfizer is pinned six times by the regulator for the simple promotion of the Covid-19 vaccine. In November 2022, the watchdog concluded that Pfizer’s chief executive had made “misleading” claims about childhood vaccines.
Following a complaint from the UsForThem group, the PMCPA therefore considered that Pfizer misled the public, made unsubstantiated allegations and failed to present information in a balanced manner. UsForThem’s Director of Legal Affairs, Ben Kingsley was surprised “ note how many times senior Pfizer executives have been found guilty of serious regulatory offenses – in this case including the most serious offense of all under the UK Code of Practice. »
In an attempt to downplay the situation, Dr Phillips, Pfizer’s UK medical director, said his post was ” accidental and unintentional “. policy and industry code of practice when using their personal social media.
Pfizer had to pay £34,800 in fines. Kingsley adds:
« , the consequences for Pfizer and the individuals concerned remain insignificant. This desperate regulatory system for a multibillion-dollar life-and-death industry has become a sham, in dire need of reform. »
In addition, the PMCPA decision states that the communications in question contained information “ limited » on the effectiveness of the vaccine, no information on safety and no reference to adverse events.
The sanctions targeting laboratories are therefore derisory when they violate the rules of good practice since the fines are very low and even if the decisions are announced in the medical and pharmaceutical press, this has little impact on the general public. . Benefits to labs, risks to patients
French regulators had the means to know having been alerted
« Vaccine effectiveness, it’s all a question of presentation » wrote France-Soir in May 2021. This misleading presentation was therefore explained in a 2021 article. Such communication can thus influence people to go get vaccinatedthus contributing to biasing free and informed consent.
From 2020, Professor Montagnier had sounded the alarm with a study which demonstrated that the virus was of manufactured origin before evoking “a strategic error which impacts the future of humanity”. He declared:
« we must abandon, and refuse compulsory vaccination, in particular medical personnel already well informed of the side effects of current vaccines ».
And Professor Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner in medicine, went further by asking the authorities to use early treatments: “ The early treatment of infection by ivermectin and bacterial antibiotic, because there is a bacterial cofactor amplifying the effects of the virus ».
In 2022, a report showed the significant limitations of studies related to the Pfizer vaccine. Biostatistician Christine Cotton concluded that “ the Pfizer vaccine had to be immediately suspended », the government having not respected the precautionary principle. Additionally, on June 9, 2022, the OPECST provisional report demonstrated the existence of side effects after hearings from numerous experts.
The BonSens.org association, as well as others, have made numerous complaints about the non-transparency of vaccine contracts as well as opacity on side effect figures or even deaths from all causes with vaccination status. These data is always requestedwithout success or hearing date, by Professor Laurent Toubiana.
A scientific publicationfrom March 2024, on 30,423 patients treated at the IHU Méditerranée, concludes that the ineffectiveness of the vaccine covid-19 and an aggravating effect of vaccination on the disease in many cases. It completes a study demonstrating the undisputed effectiveness of early treatments.
It is important to remember that covid-19 vaccines had to meet 4 conditions to be approved: proof a serious or life-threatening condition,
the proof efficiency, analysis satisfactory risk-benefit (proof of security) and the lack of alternatives (There is no suitable, approved and available alternative to the product). Regulators and authorities will undoubtedly have to quickly ask themselves the question of the risk incurred by patients with Covid-19 whose mortality is very low except for certain types of patients, of the proof of effectiveness of the vaccine (increasingly effective more questionable and contested through studies and legal procedures), significant risks with unprecedented declared side effects. Finally, early treatments, such as ivermectin, azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine are demonstrated effective in numerous studiesdespite the fact that some experts disagree on this citing “medical consensus”.
Observational data will have to be looked at, in particular those which compared the state of Para in Brazil with 296 covid deaths per million inhabitants having systematized early treatments, which is 5.5 times less than the neighboring state of Amazonia (1645 deaths per million inhabitants).
The dam of disinformation on this subject is increasingly tenuous.
At the European level, an increasingly dark horizon for von der Leyen
Belgian Frédéric Baldan filed a complaint against Ursula von der Leyen over vaccine contracts and SMS communications between von der Leyen and Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer. Exclusive information from France-Soir, subsequently relayed by Politico and numerous media, revealed that Poland and Hungary had joined this complaint. However, the media still relays incomplete and biased information probably aimed at minimizing von der Leyen’s role in the same way that Dr. Philips declared his communication accidental and unintentional! Lifting transparency on these elements of negotiations remains a prerequisite for restoring confidence.
In Australia, during the Covid Royal Commission, Dr Brighthope said about the vaccine: “ This should never have been injected into a single human being… It will never stay in the muscle, contrary to what we were promised. It moves throughout the body. It spreads to the brain, heart, blood vessels, testicles and ovaries. This is why we see so many people suffering from serious side effects ».
Professor Ian Brighthope discusses the Covid “vaccine” during the COVID Royal Commission:
“This should never have been injected into a single human being… It will never stay in the muscle, as we were promised. It travels throughout the body. It… pic.twitter.com/V2k4UE5gc6— The Trigger (@LDetrigger) February 4, 2024
British regulators who criticize Pfizer and its managers, the President of the Commission the subject of several complaints, patients with more and more numerous side effects, it seems that the light is at the end of the tunnel.
#Pfizer #accused #discrediting #pharmaceutical #industry #Covid #publications #social #networks #analyzes #consequences