For years, the transition from pregnancy to parenthood has often forced a difficult choice between physical health and professional stability. But, a significant shift in federal labor law is changing the calculus for millions of American workers. Under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, employees now have a reinforced legal pathway to request reasonable accommodations—including the ability to work from home—to manage the physical and medical demands of pregnancy and childbirth.
The law, which took effect on June 27, 2023, fills a critical gap in the American workplace. While previous laws focused primarily on preventing discrimination, this act requires employers to provide specific modifications to job duties or environments unless the company can prove that doing so would cause an “undue hardship” to the business.
As a physician and medical writer, I have seen how the lack of flexibility during the postpartum period can exacerbate health risks, from severe sleep deprivation to the complications of postpartum depression. By codifying the right to reasonable accommodations, the law acknowledges that pregnancy is not a disability, but a biological state that requires specific, temporary adjustments to maintain a worker’s health and productivity.
Defining ‘Reasonable Accommodations’ in the Modern Workplace
The scope of what constitutes a “reasonable accommodation” is broad and depends heavily on the specific needs of the employee and the nature of the role. For many, this translates to remote work options, but the law covers a wide spectrum of needs. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) notes that accommodations can include modifications to seating, allowing for more frequent breaks, or providing access to water and restrooms.
Remote work, specifically, has become a focal point for those in the postpartum phase. For a mother recovering from a C-section or managing breastfeeding schedules, the ability to work from home can be the difference between returning to the workforce and being forced into an unpaid leave of absence. When a job can be performed digitally, the “undue hardship” threshold for an employer to deny remote work becomes significantly higher.
Common examples of accommodations protected under the act include:
- Modified Schedules: Adjusting start or end times to accommodate prenatal appointments or medical needs.
- Physical Adjustments: Providing a stool for a worker who must stand for long periods or allowing a worker to sit during tasks.
- Environmental Changes: Ensuring a worker is not exposed to harmful chemicals or extreme temperatures.
- Flexible Location: Transitioning to a work-from-home or hybrid model for roles that do not require a physical presence.
The ‘Undue Hardship’ Threshold
The central tension of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act lies in the phrase “undue hardship.” This is the only legal mechanism an employer has to deny a request for accommodation. In legal terms, undue hardship refers to an action requiring significant difficulty or expense when considered in relation to the size and operational resources of the employer.

an employer cannot simply claim that “it is our policy that everyone is in the office” as a reason for denial. To legally justify a refusal, the company must demonstrate that the specific accommodation—such as working from home—would fundamentally alter the nature of the business or cause a substantial financial burden.
| Feature | Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) | Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Goal | Prevent discrimination/firing | Ensure access to accommodations |
| Requirement | Treat pregnant workers like others | Provide “reasonable” modifications |
| Burden of Proof | Employee must prove bias | Employer must prove “undue hardship” |
| Scope | General employment status | Specific health/medical needs |
Navigating the Request Process
For employees, the process of securing an accommodation begins with a clear, written request. While the law protects the worker, the burden of initiation usually rests with the employee. Documenting the request in writing—via email or a formal HR portal—creates a paper trail that is essential if the request is denied or if the worker faces retaliation.
Medical documentation is often a key component. While the PWFA does not require a worker to prove a “disability” (unlike the Americans with Disabilities Act), an employer may request a medical certification to verify that the requested accommodation is necessary for the worker’s health. This is where the intersection of medicine and law becomes critical. a physician’s note specifying the need for remote work due to physical limitations or postpartum recovery carries significant weight in the “reasonable” determination.
The act similarly protects workers from retaliation. An employer cannot fire, demote, or harass an employee for requesting an accommodation under the PWFA. This provides a layer of psychological safety for workers who previously feared that asking for a chair or a home-office arrangement would mark them as “uncommitted” to their roles.
Broadening the Impact: Who Is Affected?
The impact of this legislation extends beyond those in traditional corporate roles. It applies to a vast range of industries, including retail, manufacturing, and healthcare. For a warehouse worker, a “reasonable accommodation” might be a modified lifting limit; for a teacher, it might be a designated space for lactation. By decoupling pregnancy from the legal definition of “disability,” the PWFA removes the hurdle of having to prove a medical impairment to receive basic health support.
This is particularly vital for postpartum workers. The “fourth trimester”—the first three months after birth—is a period of intense physiological and emotional transition. The ability to work from home during this window allows for better management of maternal health, which in turn reduces long-term disability claims and increases employee retention for the employer.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or medical advice. For specific legal guidance regarding employment law, consult a licensed attorney; for medical concerns, consult a healthcare provider.
As the EEOC continues to issue guidance and courts begin to set precedents on what constitutes “undue hardship” in the era of hybrid work, the implementation of the PWFA will continue to evolve. The next critical phase involves the monitoring of enforcement actions by the EEOC to ensure that companies are not using “hardship” as a blanket excuse to deny flexibility.
Do you have experience navigating workplace accommodations? Share your thoughts and stories in the comments below.
