The chairman of the Judges’ Association, Ronit Tirosh, is currently finishing her job, and on the occasion of her departure, she was interviewed today (Friday) on the program “Halli Original” on Radio North 104.5FM to end her three years in office.
“It’s not that there are no powers for the chairman of the union, but not enough and certainly not in the proportion between the chairman and the CEO,” Tirosh began. Observer, also there is no room for those who decide to invest their time and not come once a week to do vi. This is not the status of a chairman as I know it from senior positions. The status of the chairman needs to be changed.
Tirosh also elaborated on another problem that may cause the chairmanship to become redundant for her: See reason to leave it that way. I have also checked and I do not know a structure that the chairman of the union is actually subordinate to another chairman. Do not know such a thing. The judges’ division is part of the association, so I say that the chairman and the management should be given up and the judges should be left in the position of senior officials. “
Why the allegations come after three years: “I have done enough roles in my life to understand how a board is run. There is a board and chairman who set the policy, goals and objectives, and I do not want to talk specifically about a Tepper opponent, but I think the mechanism is redundant today. “The CEO, in the structure I am proposing, will head the unit or the director – the management should be abolished because I do not see a clear structure at the moment.”
Who should replace her: “It is strange that in the tender for the position there is a clause that says that the candidates for the position can not be union members for the last seven years. I wonder, because I see an advantage in someone who comes from the field and knows. “Today he is available… I do not recommend anyone, because if I had recommended there would have been no need for a committee and a tender. I am just saying that someone who knows closely should be chosen.”
The attitude of the players towards the referees: “I see that there is a deterioration, players are more impressive than I remember. It is justified that he who blames the personal qualities of a judge and calls him corrupt… “.
On the relationship with Yariv Tepper: “The chairman of the union has no authority to replace a general manager at the level of principle because he works for an association and the authority belongs to the chairman of the association. If I were to replace it? Depending on what period, because in the beginning and even in the middle yes, for reasons of interpersonal and non-professional communication, it will be said to the credit of an opponent who has been there for many years. He made it difficult for me to do things. “
Finally, she was asked about the exchange of letters with Maccabi Tel Aviv: “I did not quarrel with them and they did not quarrel with me either. They wrote a letter in a disrespectful manner and I will not let them hurt my dignity. I do and what I intend to do, so not because I do not work for them and do not intend to report. “.