While the global conversation around “forever chemicals” has focused heavily on PFAS and microplastics, researchers have uncovered a different, less-discussed synthetic contaminant that may be far more prevalent in the air we breathe. A new study has identified surprisingly high levels of a silicone pollutant in the atmosphere, revealing that these compounds are present in nearly every environment tested, from dense metropolitan hubs to remote forests.
The chemicals, known as methylsiloxanes, are water-repelling silicone compounds widely used in a variety of consumer and industrial applications, including cosmetics, household items, and transportation lubricants. While scientists have long known that smaller methylsiloxane molecules evaporate from personal care products, this latest research highlights a more persistent threat: larger molecules that do not easily evaporate and instead hitch a ride on airborne particles.
The research, led by scientists from Utrecht University and the University of Groningen and published in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, suggests that these pollutants are among the most abundant synthetic compounds in the atmosphere. In some cases, their concentration is significantly higher than that of the more infamous PFAS chemicals.
As a physician, I find the implications of this study particularly pressing. We are seeing a pattern where synthetic compounds are integrated into the bedrock of industrial convenience long before we understand their biological cost. The fact that we are inhaling these compounds continuously, without a clear understanding of the long-term health trajectory, underscores a critical gap in our current public health monitoring.
The engine oil connection
For years, the scientific consensus was that atmospheric methylsiloxanes primarily originated from the evaporation of shampoos, deodorants, and industrial sealants. However, the new data points to a more systemic source: the internal combustion engine.
Methylsiloxanes are frequently added to engine oils and lubricants to improve performance and heat resistance. While these additives are intended to lubricate moving parts like pistons rather than be burned as fuel, the mechanics of an engine make some leakage into the combustion chamber unavoidable. Because these silicone compounds are highly heat-resistant, they survive the intense temperatures of the engine and are expelled through exhaust gases.
The study found that more than half of the detected large-molecule methylsiloxane particles likely stem from traffic emissions. Researchers confirmed this by comparing the dispersion patterns of the silicone to long-chain hydrocarbons typically found in engine oil. While the hydrocarbons break down and dilute as they travel, the methylsiloxanes remain remarkably stable, allowing them to drift far from the roads and ships that emit them.
A global footprint: From São Paulo to Lithuania
The researchers sampled air across diverse climates and economic regions to determine how widespread the pollution truly is. The results indicate that no environment is entirely untouched, though the concentration varies based on proximity to urban activity.
The highest levels were recorded in the São Paulo metropolitan area in Brazil, where concentrations reached 98 nanograms per cubic meter. In contrast, the lowest levels were found in the forests of Rugsteliskis, Lithuania, at 0.9 nanograms per cubic meter. Even in the slight rural village of Cabauw in the Netherlands, levels remained measurable at 2 nanograms per cubic meter.
| Location | Environment Type | Concentration (ng/m³) |
|---|---|---|
| São Paulo, Brazil | Urban Metropolitan | 98 |
| Cabauw, Netherlands | Rural Village | 2 |
| Rugsteliskis, Lithuania | Forest | 0.9 |
According to the study, these large molecular methylsiloxanes make up between 2, and 4.3 percent of the total mass of organic aerosols in the atmosphere. To put that in perspective, the atmospheric concentrations of PFAS are typically more than a thousand times lower, making this silicone pollutant a dominant feature of the synthetic airborne landscape.
Health risks and climate interference
The ubiquity of these compounds means that human exposure is likely constant. While the immediate toxicity of methylsiloxanes may be low, the chronic, lifelong inhalation of these particles is an unknown variable in respiratory and systemic health.
“We estimate that the daily inhalation dose of methylsiloxanes may exceed that of other synthetic compounds, such as PFAS and micro- and nanoplastics,” said Rupert Holzinger, an associate professor at Utrecht University who co-supervised the study. Holzinger emphasized the “urgent need” for a comprehensive evaluation of these health impacts.
Beyond human health, the researchers warned that this silicone pollutant in the atmosphere could be altering the planet’s climate regulation. Aerosols play a pivotal role in how clouds form and how they reflect sunlight. Methylsiloxanes can change the surface tension of these aerosols, potentially interfering with ice nucleation—a critical step in the formation of clouds.
If these chemicals are altering cloud behavior on a global scale, the effects could ripple through weather patterns and temperature regulation, adding another layer of complexity to an already fragile climate system.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Please consult a healthcare provider for concerns regarding environmental exposure or respiratory health.
The next step for the scientific community will be to move from detection to toxicity testing. Researchers are now calling for targeted studies to determine how these large silicone molecules interact with lung tissue and whether they accumulate in the body over time. As regulatory bodies begin to scrutinize PFAS more heavily, methylsiloxanes may soon join the list of synthetic compounds requiring strict industrial oversight.
Do you think industrial lubricants should face stricter emissions standards? Share your thoughts in the comments or share this story to start the conversation.
