Spain: a significant unexplained excess lethality in July

by time news

Time.news — “ The excess of deaths in July is five times higher than the average for the month of July, and it is only very little because of the heat or the covid. »

This is how the daily “El Pais” title last Monday, in One. The reference newspaper of the Spanish center left cites the Carlos III Institute of Epidemiology, which takes up the statistics of the MoMo (for monitorizacion de la mortalidad, in Spanish). According to the MoMo, 9,687 people died in July, as part of “ an excess of mortality representing five times the average value for the month of July. »

« In all, it would be 41,000 people who would have died, or 20% more than last year for the same period. “Part of the deaths could be explained” directly or indirectly due to heat “, reports El Pais. This portion would relate to 1,913 people, according to the MoMo, between July 1 and July 26, 2022. Four times more than last year – assuming that the parameters for deferring deaths due to heat did not have varied, most of which would relate to subjects over 80 years old. Mortality statistics affecting the very old age group are rarely corrected for their growing overrepresentation as a share of the overall population. There will be more and more deaths from seasonal colds and heat waves, as there are more and more people entering the old age category, and Spain is the second most aging society in the world, after the Japan, in a curve by 2050, according to the United Nations.

The press reports that the values ​​would be between 5 to 10°C higher than the seasonal average. However, these temperatures recorded in Spain, in July 2022, oscillating between 38 and 42 degrees, correspond to what in Spanish memory, constitutes the norm, long before global warming becomes a concern. There would therefore perhaps be a factor of lower metabolic resilience to high temperatures. It’s a hypothesis like any other.

According to El Pais, 1,872 people have died from Covid. Either with a Covid death certificate, without specifying whether they died with or from the Covid. Always is ” that there are still thousands of unplanned (sic) deaths due to other reasons. Reasons for which there are more hypotheses than certainties », deplored El Pais.

Faced with these unexplained deaths and in the absence of epistemological interest on the part of public and private health institutes to set up the related studies, the hypotheses are going well. One, empirical, formulated by society, relates to the poor general state of health of the population. The health crisis has created a health vacuum, while giving the impression of beefing up health policy with propaganda. In Spain, precisely, last year, 2,200 rooms in Intensive Care Units were confiscated to counter the waves of “ new covid variants “. These beds were never occupied, on the other hand the postponements of the operations which could possibly call upon this type of installation precipitated the statistics of lethality in a proportion which would begin to be felt, perhaps explaining the excess lethality. In any case, the question is posed: negligence and denial of care in 2020 and 2021, do they have an impact in terms of excess lethality in 2022 and more in the years to come?

All people who have had to visit a hospital in the phase of “ health collapse discovered a deserted hospital. Today, the consequences would begin to be measured. A population in worse health, which continues its demographic aging process, but after two years of denial of access to care and almost total cessation of preventive medicine. In such a configuration, it is obvious that the slightest demanding condition or the slightest mesological challenge constitutes a threat for systems that are too weak to develop adaptation functions.

It is probably too early to measure the damage of the deliberately orchestrated crawl space over the past two years. Millions have been gobbled up by consulting firms, so the “ we did not know is excluded. Especially since several international institutions were warning as early as 2020, if only of the consequences of stopping breast cancer prevention, to cite just this example. The access made more difficult for the medication of cancer patients as well as for all endemic diseases, the sudden inexplicable ban on the prescription of antibiotics, or other drugs hitherto part of the ordinary pharmacopoeia, the cessation of medical visits at home or the digitization of consultations for people who are victims of the digital divide.

The economic and psychological effects would play an important role in this systemic explanation of poor general health and therefore of excess lethality. Spain measures it, but these results could be extrapolated to other countries. It is only to think that in 2020, according to the own WHO, yet guilty in the first place, 23 million children did not have access to basic vaccination, that of real vaccines.

In addition to the crawl space itself, there is another concern that affects the majority of the population. This concern relates to the products inoculated within the framework of the massive, sometimes coercive, vaccination campaign. In view of this excess mortality, the question of many, with retroactive effect, would relate to the content of the product and its side effects over time. 83.27% of the Spanish population is vaccinated under the complete scheme. The countries of southern Europe have on the whole been the most zealous for vaccination, according to Our World In Data, 86.4% of the population have been injected, in Italy it is 80.5%, and in France 78.6%. In northern Europe, the numbers tend to drop. Including in EU member states that have made the measure compulsory, such as Austria: 74.3%, of which a significant proportion is made up of false certificates. In the Netherlands, this figure drops to 69.3% and in the Eastern countries, it passes the 60% mark. It would be better to think that the excess lethality in Spain, in the same way as that observed statistically in Israel, in certain states of the United States, is decorrelated from vaccines against Sars-Cov-2 because, it is all the same 62% of the world population that would be immediately affected by an existential threat.

You may also like

Leave a Comment