Sunlight on Demand: Can Artificial Sunsets Work?

by Priyanka Patel

Reflecting on Risk: Astronomers Fear ‘Sunlight on Demand’ Satellites Will Erase the Night Sky

A US startup’s ambitious plan to beam sunlight to Earth, extending the operational hours of solar farms, is raising serious concerns among astronomers who warn of potentially “devastating” light pollution. Reflect Orbital aims to illuminate the planet with a constellation of satellites employing massive mirrors, a concept that, while potentially groundbreaking, could irrevocably alter our view of the cosmos.

The company proposes a system of “sunlight on demand,” utilizing mirrors to redirect solar energy to terrestrial solar farms even after sunset. Reflect Orbital has applied to launch a test satellite, named Earendil-1, as early as 2026, with plans to eventually deploy approximately 4,000 satellites by 2030. But the feasibility of the project – and its potential consequences – are now under intense scrutiny.

How Would ‘Bouncing Sunlight’ Actually Work?

The principle behind Reflect Orbital’s technology is surprisingly simple. Just as sunlight can be reflected off a small surface like a wristwatch, the satellites would use large mirrors to beam light towards Earth. However, the scale is vastly different. These satellites, planned to orbit roughly 625 kilometers above the ground, would eventually feature mirrors spanning 54 meters across.

The challenge lies in the physics of light dispersion. Because the Sun isn’t a pinpoint source of light but rather spans half a degree in the sky, a reflected beam spreads out over distance. According to calculations based on the proposed satellite altitude, the illuminated patch of ground could be at least 7 kilometers across. Even employing curved mirrors or lenses wouldn’t significantly focus the light due to this inherent dispersion.

One analyst noted that a single 54-meter satellite would be 15,000 times fainter than the midday sun, but still considerably brighter than the full moon. This raises immediate concerns about the impact on astronomical observations.

A Balloon Test and Scaling Challenges

Last year, Reflect Orbital founder Ben Nowack shared a video showcasing a test using a 2.5-meter reflector carried by a hot air balloon. The test demonstrated the potential to generate 516 watts of light per square meter at a distance of 242 meters – roughly half the power of the midday sun, and sufficient for practical use.

However, scaling this test to space presents significant hurdles. To achieve the same effect from an 800km orbit, the reflector would need to be an impractical 6.5km by 6.5km – covering an area of 42 square kilometers.

Reflect Orbital’s current plan centers around “simple satellites in the right constellation shining on existing solar farms,” aiming for a target of 200 watts per square meter – 20% of the midday sun. Achieving this with smaller satellites would require a massive number. Calculations suggest that approximately 3,000 satellites would be needed to illuminate a single region with that level of intensity.

Furthermore, the speed of these satellites – traveling at 7.5 kilometers per second – means any given location would only be illuminated for a mere 3.5 minutes. Extending illumination to even an hour would necessitate thousands more satellites. Nowack has even suggested a constellation of 250,000 satellites, exceeding the total number of currently cataloged satellites and space debris combined. Such a vast network, however, would only deliver 20% of midday sun to a limited number of locations, and even that would be subject to weather conditions.

The Threat to Astronomy and the Natural Night Sky

While the economic viability of the project remains questionable, the potential for light pollution is undeniable. Even a single operational satellite could appear brighter than the full moon, and a constellation of such mirrors would pose a severe threat to astronomical research.

“A constellation of such mirrors would be devastating to astronomy and dangerous to astronomers,” one expert warned. Looking through a telescope, the surface of each mirror could appear as bright as the sun, risking permanent eye damage. Beyond the impact on professional observatories, the light pollution would hinder everyone’s ability to experience the natural beauty of the night sky. Light pollution is also known to disrupt the natural rhythms of animals.

The satellites’ beams, while intended for specific locations, would inevitably sweep across the Earth as they move, potentially creating flashes of light brighter than the moon. Reflect Orbital has stated it plans to redirect sunlight in a “brief, predictable and targeted” manner, avoiding observatories and sharing satellite locations. However, these assurances have not fully alleviated concerns within the scientific community.

[Image of cheaper rockets enabling satellite constellations: SpaceX/Flickr, CC BY-NC]

A Future Hanging in the Balance

Whether Reflect Orbital’s project will ultimately succeed remains to be seen. Launching a test satellite is one thing; deploying and maintaining a constellation of tens or hundreds of thousands of enormous mirrors is an entirely different undertaking.

However, the potential consequences – for astronomers, and for anyone who values the darkness of the night sky – are too significant to ignore. It’s a project to watch closely, as the stakes are exceptionally high. The consequences of success for astronomers – and anyone else who likes the night sky dark – would be dire.

Leave a Comment