The appeals anti-corruption courtroom rejected the attraction of the prosecutor’s workplace in opposition to the decision of acquittal of Arush Arushanyan – 2024-05-29 17:07:15

by times news cr

2024-05-29 17:07:15

The judicial act of acquittal of Goris group chief Arush Arushanyan remained unchanged. In accordance with Pastinfo, the Appellate Anti-corruption Courtroom, presided over by Choose Armen Hovhannisyan and composed of Judges Karen Amiryan, Mesrop Makyan, rejected the appeals of the prosecution in opposition to the acquittal of Arush Arushanyan and others, leaving the acquittal unchanged. The decision was revealed a number of days in the past.

The Courtroom of Normal Jurisdiction of Syunik Area, chaired by Choose Gnel Gasparyan, 2022. on March 28, revealed the decision within the case of Arush Arushanyan and others, in keeping with which Arushanyan was acquitted of the episode of alleged electoral prison acts attributed to him, and within the different episode, he was discovered responsible and sentenced to 1 yr and 6 months in jail, together with Arushanyan’s eight months of detention. the time period, the courtroom imposed imprisonment for six months as the ultimate punishment, which was not utilized conditionally. The courtroom imposed a probationary interval for Arushanyan for a interval of 1.5 years, on the identical time, Arushanyan was sentenced to a effective and a 5-year restriction on holding the place of head of the native authorities. Lusine Avetyan, the pinnacle of the Karahunj settlement, and two different defendants, Samvel Dinunts and Hrayr Baghdasaryan, had been additionally acquitted, whereas Erik Aghajanyan and Harut Lalazaryan had been discovered responsible.

Within the indictment, the prosecutor demanded that Arushanyan be discovered responsible and sentenced to 9.5 years in jail, and the courtroom acquitted him of the election crimes he was accused of, and gave him a conditional sentence for the opposite half, imposing a probationary interval.

The prosecuting prosecutors filed an attraction, demanding to cancel the courtroom act of acquittal, make a brand new determination and discover the three defendants within the case, together with Arushanyan, responsible. The protection additionally filed an attraction in opposition to the decision, demanding that the defendants be acquitted on the opposite counts as effectively. The courtroom left the choice of the primary occasion courtroom unchanged.

You may also like

Leave a Comment