2024-02-09 19:05:48
Subhan Hasanli
It is clear that the Chamber of Accounts refused to give a positive audit opinion to the activities of the construction of Olympic complexes carried out by the Ministry of Youth and Sports of the Republic of Azerbaijan and noted that the activities do not meet the audit criteria. Where are those who praise the public relations of the newly appointed Minister? Taking a selfie with 3-5 young people does not mean that the activity is successful. The main thing is how the state budget is managed. Why did the Chamber of Accounts not issue an audit opinion? Because there are shameful facts.
For example:
1) The implementation of the state investment policy and control over the implementation of investment projects, as well as the financing of these projects, were organized at an unsatisfactory level, and illegal expenses were allowed in several cases. Thus, the compliance of the constructed objects with the measures envisaged in the state programs, technical and economic justification and assessment are not fully ensured, the measures envisaged in the State Program for the socio-economic development of the regions are not partially or fully implemented, the allocation of funds for investment costs in a timely manner and in the specified amount measures have not been taken, therefore, 161.5 mln. to complete the implementation of the projects. The use of funds in the amount of manat was not ensured.
2) 135.2 thousand manats in 6 cases and 379.6 thousand manats for unfulfilled works and non-existent furniture and equipment in 80 cases as a result of overstating the scope of work in relation to the project in the estimate documents and works acceptance acts for the “Construction of the Olympic Sports Complex in Goranboy region”, 457 due to the deviation arising from the cost of the work calculated by applying the basic coefficient method to the performed work volumes in 1 case,
3) In 1 case, the bidder with a discrepancy in the period of the bank guarantee was declared the winner instead of being excluded from the procedure, in 6 cases, the name of the bidders who offered a price higher than the expected price was not mentioned in the final protocol and the relevant executive authority was not informed about it, in 7 cases, the purchase contract was drawn up in accordance with the model form not done, in 3 cases the bank guarantee of the contract execution for the extended period of the changes added to the purchase contracts and in 1 case the bank guarantee for 30 bank days after the contract period was not provided by the contractors, in 5 cases the probable price of the object was determined after the conclusion of the purchase contract (arrangement), In 1 case, the additional agreement protocol to the contract regarding the extension of the contract period was not drawn up, in 7 cases, the information about the results of the purchase contracts was not posted in the press agency where the tender announcement was made or on the official website, and in 1 case, it was posted with a delay.
They are still part of it. How can the activity of the minister be satisfactory when there are so many illegalities?