Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov confirmed on Friday that the crisis in Syria requires cooperation between Russia, Iran and Turkey.
Lavrov said in a press release, “The crisis in Syria requires cooperation between Russia, Turkey, and Iran, through the (Astana Formula), which aims to strengthen consensus among the Syrians and prevent led to the aggravation of separatist tendencies.”
He added, “There is information about the support of these terrorist groups in Syria from major countries,” noting that “the Zionist entity might potentially be interested in worsening the situation in syria to relieve pressure on the gaza Strip. “
He said that he “hopes that the meetings scheduled for this week will help to stabilize the situation in Syria,” stressing that “russia does not want a nuclear war with the United States, and does not believe that the Ukrainian issue is to solve the Ukrainian issue. Only Moscow and Washington.”
For more news, subscribe to our channel on Telegram
How does the relationship between Russia and Turkey affect the peace process in Syria?
Interview with Dr. Alexei Petrov, Expert on International Relations and Middle Eastern Affairs
Date: October 2023
Editor (Time.news): Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Petrov. Recently, Russian Foreign minister Sergei Lavrov emphasized the necessity of cooperation among Russia, Iran, and Turkey regarding the Syrian crisis. How significant is this trilateral collaboration?
Dr. Alexei Petrov: Thank you for having me. the trilateral collaboration among Russia, Iran, and Turkey is crucial for several reasons. First, these nations have vested interests in Syria and their combined efforts can lead to a more stabilized surroundings. The Astana Formula, which Lavrov mentioned, is an essential framework that seeks to foster dialog among Syrians themselves, which is vital for peacebuilding.
Editor: Lavrov also pointed out the continued support of terrorist groups in Syria from major countries. What implications does this have for international diplomacy?
Dr. Alexei Petrov: this claim indicates a complex geopolitical situation where proxy conflicts frequently enough overshadow the main issues. Such support complicates the peace process and raises tensions in the region. If major countries are indeed involved in backing these groups, it could hinder any progress made through cooperation among Russia, turkey, and iran. This scenario requires substantial diplomatic maneuvering and sustained engagement from all parties to address existing grievances.
Editor: You mentioned the peace process. With Israel’s involvement suggested by Lavrov, how might their interests intersect with those of Russia, Iran, and Turkey?
Dr. Alexei Petrov: Israel’s interests, notably in countering threats from Iranian influence and maintaining its security, can create a challenging dynamic. If Lavrov’s assertions are accurate, israel might perceive instability in Syria as beneficial, given their concerns over Iran’s advancing military capabilities. Though, this could lead to escalation rather than stabilization, creating an environment where all parties could become more entrenched in their positions. Diplomacy will be key to avoiding potential conflicts stemming from this embroiled situation.
Editor: Regarding Lavrov’s hope for stabilization through upcoming meetings, what practical steps shoudl be taken to support this aim?
Dr. Alexei Petrov: Effective communication channels must be established and maintained among these influential nations. Confidence-building measures are essential, including ceasefires and humanitarian aid initiatives.Additionally, engaging local Syrian actors in the discussions can ensure that the peace processes reflect the needs and aspirations of the Syrian people, not just geopolitical interests.
Editor: Lavrov suggested a desire to prevent nuclear conflicts with the United States. How critically important is it for Russia to address issues beyond the Syrian crisis, particularly in the context of Ukraine?
Dr.Alexei Petrov: Russia’s emphasis on avoiding nuclear confrontation highlights the seriousness of the current geopolitical climate. While the immediate focus is on Syria, a broader dialogue, especially regarding Ukraine, is crucial. Both issues are intertwined; resolving one could have positive repercussions on the other. It’s essential for Russia and the U.S. to engage in serious discussions that prioritize de-escalation and open avenues for diplomatic resolutions to prevent misunderstandings that could spiral into larger conflicts.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Petrov, for sharing your insights. It’s evident that the situation in Syria remains complex and requires careful consideration of multiple factors.
Dr. Alexei Petrov: Thank you for the possibility; it’s vital that we stay informed about these developments as they can significantly impact regional and global stability.
For more insights on international affairs, subscribe to our channel on Telegram.