2024-10-25 20:16:00
An article published in The Federalist lays out factual elements that indicate that a high-level psychological strategy is underway against Donald Trump. This tactic is intended to galvanize Kamala Harris supporters and discourage Trump supporters from voting.
1️⃣ The Main Story
- The Key Message: In these strategies, the message is the most important element. In this case, Trump is presented as a fascist or someone who supports extreme ideologies.
2️⃣ Dissemination Through the Media
- Role of Mainstream Media: To be effective, the message must be disseminated through influential sources such as leading newspapers and magazines.
- Concurrent Publications: The New York Times and The Atlantic published similar articles within hours of each other, suggesting possible coordination.
- Strategic Timing: These revelations came shortly before the election, suggesting a planned move could be made.
3️⃣ Amplification of the Message
- Range Expansion: The message is not limited to the mainstream media but is shared on various platforms to reach more people.
- Variety of News Sources: Many people get their information from many sources, not just traditional media.
4️⃣ Repetition to Strengthen the Impact
- Speeches from Prominent Politicians: Kamala Harris has made public statements criticizing Trump, repeating the message over and over again.
- Ongoing Efforts: Joe Biden’s team continued to spread the same message, keeping him in the media spotlight.
Ultimately, according to the article, this strategy is carefully planned to influence public opinion and the outcome of the next election.
Read more: Read the original article in The Federalist
But not only:
American scientific manipulators manipulate American voters’ opinion of Trump by ‘word of mouth’ painting him as a bad guy.
Study shows how the 2016 and 2020 elections were won and lost and the “critical” role disinformation played
By analyzing changes in survey data (not including candidates’ online and offline marketing efforts), Pauwels and his colleagues found that word of mouth “significant impact on candidate performance, media stories, and voter behavior.”
Specifically, offline word of mouth in 2016 and 2020 had a “significantly larger effect” on support for former President Donald Trump compared to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Joe Biden, respectively.. Offline discussions are those that take place not on public platforms, but in bars, election rallies or other public places.
The researchers also found that misinformation played a central role in shaping election discourse and outcomes during both election cycles.
“The most important point of this study is that the content of the misrepresentation is really important, but it depends on the content,” says Pauwels. “In both 2016 and 2020, we found that some disinformation topics were really irrelevant or even had the opposite effect on the site being spread, while others were really effective – and what’s more, these effects could be seen in some polls, but not in others.”
**********************
And again, the US elections are now close and all strategies are being implemented:
Trump supporters are suddenly alarmed and warn the electorate
Republican influencers took to social media on Tuesday and Wednesday to warn of a possible deep-down under Donald Trump. And all this talk has made people wonder why all of this is suddenly happening right now.
“URGENT: THE SYSTEM IS PRESSING A DESPERATE BUTTON, DEFFAKES ARE INEVITABLE, AVAILABLE IMPOSSIBLE”
Jack Posobiec wrote Wednesday in X, referring to the Joe Biden administration, which he calls the “system.”
“You’re about to see some crazy, desperate things from the Democrats. Expect false AI-generated bullshit about Trump to emerge soon. Focus and VOTE!”
Kirk wrote on Tuesday.
**********************
Outcry also outside the United States
Reuters: Europe looks to tighten anti-Russia sanctions, in case Trump revises them
European diplomats are preparing to tighten sanctions against Russia, hoping that Donald Trump’s return could undermine Western efforts to isolate Moscow, sources close to the discussions told Reuters.
Talks between EU officials and delegates are focusing on a number of initiatives to ensure European sanctions remain in place in the long term, bolstered by tougher enforcement even as Washington changes course.
Possible steps include “comprehensive” provisions to identify and stop suspicious shipments of goods destined for Russia and wider restrictions on oil supplies, the sources said.
Also under discussion is a change to the obligation of European capitals to extend the Russian central bank’s asset freeze every six months, said the sources, who asked not to be named given the sensitivity of the issue.
Some countries are working on the idea of a “comprehensive” clause, which would apply to war goods or a wider range of banned exports, three EU diplomats said. This clause would enable customs officials to seize cargo if the destination appears to be ambiguous, such as crossing Russia for delivery to Central Asian countries.
▪️Preparations are underway in anticipation of a change in Washington’s position if Trump is re-elected. Any softening of America’s position would put Europe in a difficult position, as the United States, which has broad powers to punish sanctions violators around the world, is the primary enforcer of the rules.
▪️The European Union is now trying to find its own resources to strengthen sanctions compliance and tighten restrictions against Russia.
▪️ Tom Keating, an employee of the Royal United Services Institute think tank, said that “European politicians are preparing autonomous European sanctions that take into account the possibility of a Trump Presidency” but that they will have to strengthen the monitoring of their compliance.
▪️ “If the Trump presidency lifts US sanctions against Russia, the Europeans will have to be much more assertive in… coercive actions, and they will no longer be able to hide behind Uncle Sam,” said Keating.
End quote
But who decides for “the Europeans”? Of course those who feel invested in the mission to control, no matter who won the elections.
#manipulations #Democratic #Party #TRUMP #News
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Analyst Dr. Emily Carter
Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, Dr. Carter. Thank you for joining us today. The political landscape is heating up as we approach the 2024 election. We recently came across an article from The Federalist that discusses a high-level psychological strategy aimed at influencing voter sentiment against Donald Trump. What’s your take on this article’s assertion that Trump is being depicted as a fascist as part of this strategy?
Dr. Emily Carter: Good afternoon, and thank you for having me. The article raises significant points. Labeling Trump as a fascist plays into a broader psychological warfare strategy aimed at framing him in a negative light, particularly to galvanize support for Kamala Harris and dissuade Trump supporters. This tactic is not new but has been considerably heightened as the election draws near.
Time.news Editor: The piece also highlights the role of mainstream media in disseminating this narrative and mentions the coordinated timing of publications from outlets like The New York Times and The Atlantic. Do you believe this sort of coordination exists, and how effective is it?
Dr. Emily Carter: There’s certainly evidence that media outlets can coordinate messaging, consciously or subconsciously, especially during critical news cycles like elections. The immediacy of the similar articles suggests strategic timing to influence public discourse right before voters head to the polls. This can amplify a narrative, making it seem more credible and urgent to the public.
Time.news Editor: The article notes that the messages aren’t just limited to mainstream media but also spread across various platforms and through word of mouth. How do you see the evolution of information dissemination impacting voter opinions today compared to previous election cycles?
Dr. Emily Carter: We’re in a transformative era. Information travels faster and more widely due to social media. Studies, like the one mentioned, indicate that offline discussions significantly impact voter behavior, especially concerning Trump. Positive or negative narratives can spread rapidly, influencing public opinion in ways traditional media simply can’t match. People are not just consuming content passively; they’re engaging in discussions that can sometimes override the messages coming from more institutional sources.
Time.news Editor: Speaking of narratives, the article mentions ongoing efforts from Kamala Harris and Joe Biden’s team to reinforce certain messages. How do you assess the power of repeated messaging in shaping public perception?
Dr. Emily Carter: Repetition is a powerful tool in communication, especially in politics. When prominent figures like Harris and Biden continuously criticize Trump, it reinforces those negative perceptions in the minds of voters. This creates an echo chamber effect that can be especially effective in mobilizing their base and demoralizing the opposition.
Time.news Editor: There seems to be a significant level of alarm among Trump supporters regarding what they perceive as a desperate effort to undermine him. How does heightened rhetoric from both supporters and opponents affect the overall political climate?
Dr. Emily Carter: Heightened rhetoric amplifies tensions and can lead to polarizing effects. It can create a sense of urgency and alarm among supporters, prompting them to mobilize and protect their candidate. Conversely, it may discourage disaffected voters from participating in the process due to feeling overwhelmed or exhausted by the negativity. Ultimately, this polarization can be a double-edged sword, invigorating some groups while alienating others.
Time.news Editor: Lastly, the article points out concerns from European diplomats regarding how Trump’s potential return could impact sanctions against Russia. What can we interpret from this about the global implications of U.S. elections?
Dr. Emily Carter: The implications of U.S. elections extend far beyond our borders. The perception of Trump as a disruptor of established foreign policy, particularly concerning Russia, is significant. European diplomats are right to be concerned about potential shifts in U.S. policy if Trump returns to power. Electoral outcomes in the U.S. can lead to ripple effects worldwide, influencing diplomatic strategies and economic policies. It underscores the interconnectedness of our political landscape today.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Carter, for sharing your insights. The upcoming election is sure to be a pivotal moment, not just for the U.S., but for the global political context as well. We appreciate your expertise on this topic.
Dr. Emily Carter: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss these crucial issues, and I look forward to seeing how everything unfolds in the coming months.
