2024-05-09 04:00:00
On May 4, Chantal Guy from The Press she wrote a text on the terrorist attacks that set Paris on fire on 13 November 2015.
“Paris was the target of the worst terrorist attacks in its history,” she wrote.
It was a “violent break into the daily life of such a vibrant city”.
“As chance would have it, I was in Paris that evening, in the heart of the 11th arrondissement, where most of the shootings took place.”
“We can hear Kalashnikov shots.”
“What struck me was the youth of the victims and the killers, in a deliberate attack on the joy of living.”
But who carried out these attacks?
Who fired a Kalashnikov at innocent people?
Chantal Guy never says it.
The words “Islam” and “Islamic” do not appear in his text.
She talks about disaster.
Of events.
But the reason? Ugh.
A minor.
Which she chose to ignore.
History, I believe, has not “fed Islamophobia”.
To paraphrase The Stranger from Camus: “Yesterday, Paris died.
Maybe it was Christians who fired.
The text does not say it. “The city of blood. Funeral soon.”
It doesn’t mean anything. Maybe they are Buddhists.”
HIDE THIS REASON!
I am asking you a very simple question.
What if it was far-right activists who killed 129 people in cold blood that fateful evening?
Do you think the journalist from The Press would this fact be hidden?
Of course not.
She would have written it in her first article. And she would have repeated it at least ten times.
With reason.
Because that’s not a detail.
He would even be at the heart of the massacre.
It is a deliberate concealment of why 129 innocent people were killed, on which these ideological victims claimed the ideological bullet, on which their altar prayed, the reason they were killed as animals, kill them a second time.
“It is a bad thing to name things much to the misfortune of the world,” as Camus said.
OPTIONAL REMOVAL
I am talking to you about this text because the author’s deafening silence says a lot about the moral hypocrisy of our time.
Not a day goes by without the excesses and dangers of denying the true right.
It is very simple, we see fascists everywhere.
But the far left? Isn’t she dangerous too?
And what about the Islamist threat?
Why aren’t the “social justice warriors” who are loudly protesting against Israel also protesting against Iran? Afghanistan? China? What about all the other countries that imprison and execute women, homosexuals, regime fighters or members of religious minorities?
No. We always aim at the same goals.
The West, the far right and the Christian right. In short, the white devil.
Another extremism, that which leans to the left and includes Islam (the dominant religion in so-called “racist” communities) is “protected”.
Either we minimize the danger.
Or – when it draws blood – we “forget” to name it.
As if there were two types of extremists.
The evil white fascists.
And those who became evil because of evil white fascists.
#Demonstration #Israel.. #Iran