The oldest genomes of our species have been sequenced

by Laura Richards – Editor-in-Chief
000 years ago, individuals from ‍Ranis in​ Germany‌ and ​Zlat kun in the ‌Czech Republic probably traveled together across the​ open steppe landscapes of Europe.” width=”690″ height=”406″ border=”0″/>

Illustration of the group Zlat kun/Ranis. About 45,000 years ago, individuals⁤ from Ranis in Germany and Zlat kun in the Czech Republic probably traveled together across‌ the open steppe landscapes of ⁣Europe. – TOM⁤ BJÖRKLUND/MPIEA

​ An international team led by⁢ researchers from‍ the Max planck Institute for Evolutionary​ Anthropology has sequenced the oldest modern human⁣ genomes to date.

⁤ ⁢ Genomes were recovered from ⁣seven individuals who They lived between 42,000 and 49,000 years ago in Ranis (Germany) and zlaty kun (Czech republic). These genomes⁢ belonged‍ to individuals who were⁤ part of a small,⁢ closely related​ human ⁢group that ⁤split from⁣ the population that left Africa about 50,000 years ago and afterward settled the rest⁢ of the world.

⁤ ⁤ Although ⁢they⁣ diverged early, the Neanderthal DNA in their genomes dates back to ‌an admixture event common to all people outside of Africa, which Researchers date it to around 45,000-49,000 years ago, much later ⁣than⁢ previously believed.

‍ A key ‌site in Europe is zlaty ‌kun in the Czech Republic, where⁣ the complete skull of a single individual who lived around 45,000 years ago was discovered​ and ⁤previously genetically ‌analyzed. however, due to the lack of⁣ archaeological context, It has not been possible to⁣ link this individual to any archaeologically ​defined group. A nearby site, the Ilsenhöhle at Ranis in Germany, about 230 km from​ Zlaty kun, is known for a specific type ‍of archaeology, Lincombian-Ranisian-Jerzmanowician (LRJ), dating to around 45,000 years‍ ago.

‍ It⁣ has long been debated whether ⁤the LRJ⁢ culture⁢ was produced by Neanderthals or early modern humans.Even though mostly small bone​ fragments are preserved at Ranis, a previous study was able to analyze the mitochondrial DNA⁣ of thirteen of these remains and found that they belonged to modern humans and not ⁢Neanderthals.⁣ Though, as the mitochondrial sequence constitutes only a small part of the genetic details, Relationships with other ⁤modern humans have remained a mystery.

A new study ‌published on December 12 in Nature analyzed the nuclear genomes of all thirteen Ranis specimens and found that they represented at least six individuals. The size of the⁣ bones indicated that‍ two of these individuals were ⁣newborns and, genetically, three ⁤were male ⁢and three ⁤were female. Interestingly,among these individuals were ⁤a mother⁤ and⁤ daughter,as well as other more distant ​biological relatives. The⁢ team also ⁣sequenced more DNA from the female ​skull found at⁤ Zlaty kun, producing a high-quality ‌genome ‌for this ⁣individual.

⁤ “To our surprise, we discovered a fifth or sixth‌ degree genetic relationship between Zlaty kun and two Ranis individuals.” This was stated by the study’s lead‌ author, Arev Sümer in a statement that “this means that Zlaty kun ⁤was genetically part of the extended Ranis family and probably also produced​ LRJ-type instruments.”

Among the six Ranis individuals, one bone was particularly⁤ well preserved; actually, it⁢ is indeed the best preserved modern Pleistocene human‍ bone for DNA recovery. This allowed‍ the team​ to ‌obtain a high-quality genome of this male individual, known as Ranis 13. Together, ⁣the genomes of Ranis13 and Zlaty kun they represent the oldest high-quality modern human genomes ‍sequenced to ⁣date. By analyzing genetic variants related to phenotypic traits, they found that⁤ Ranis and Zlaty kun individuals had variants associated with ​dark skin and hair color, as ⁢well as brown eyes, reflecting the recent African origin of this first European population.

By analyzing the segments inherited ‌from⁤ the same ancestor in the ⁢genomes of ⁣Ranis and Zlaty kun, the researchers estimated that their ⁢population consisted ‌of at most a few hundred⁢ individuals who they could have been dispersed over a larger territory. the authors found no evidence that this small population of ⁣early modern humans⁣ contributed to the formation of later europeans ‍or any other global population.

How has the technology for⁤ sequencing ancient DNA ⁢evolved in recent ⁢years?

Interview Between⁣ Time.news Editor and Dr. Emma Stein, Evolutionary Geneticist

Editor: Good afternoon, Dr. Stein!⁢ It’s a pleasure to have you here with us‍ today to discuss the groundbreaking research out of the ⁣Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology regarding the oldest​ modern human genomes.

Dr.‍ Stein: Thank you ‌for having me! I’m excited to ​dive⁣ into this fascinating topic.

Editor: So,the study mentions that the⁣ genomes where sequenced from ⁢individuals who⁣ lived between 42,000 and 49,000 ⁤years ago in what we now know as Germany and ​the Czech Republic.Can you provide some context about these locations during that time period?

Dr.Stein: Absolutely. During ⁢that era,Europe was quite different‌ than today. The climates⁢ were varied, ⁤and these regions consisted mainly of open steppe landscapes. It‍ is believed that early modern humans, like those from Ranis and Zlaty kun, traversed these ​expanses,‌ possibly ‍following large⁢ herds of animals.

Editor: Intriguing! The research suggests that these individuals​ were ‌part of a small, closely related‍ human group that had separated from the population that migrated ​out⁣ of Africa. What can you tell ⁢us about ‌this migration pattern?

Dr. Stein:‍ This is a pivotal ‍moment in human history! ‍Approximately 50,000 years ago, groups of humans began migrating out of Africa, leading ⁣to the global⁣ dispersion we observe today. ⁤The⁣ individuals from⁢ ranis⁣ and Zlaty kun represent‌ a branch that⁤ diverged early on. Understanding thier genomes gives​ us‍ insight into how small‍ groups might have adapted and⁢ traveled across diverse environments, ultimately⁣ leading to the genetic⁢ diversity ⁣we see in modern humans.

Editor: The article mentions Neanderthal DNA in the genomes of ⁢these early humans.How critically important is this finding?

Dr. Stein: It’s ​quite significant. These genomes show us that ⁤early modern humans had‌ interactions ⁣with Neanderthals, who were contemporaneous with ‌them in Europe. The presence ⁣of Neanderthal DNA indicates ⁤not onyl contact⁣ but⁤ also interbreeding, which contributed to the genetic make-up of modern humans. These interactions have shaped⁤ our evolution in ways we‌ are still uncovering.

Editor: What technologies or methods were used to sequence‍ these ancient⁢ genomes?

Dr.Stein: The researchers employed advanced techniques in ancient DNA ⁢extraction and sequencing. This typically involves careful handling of bone ‌or tooth samples‍ to avoid contamination.Once the DNA is isolated,⁢ high-throughput ⁢sequencing allows scientists to read the genetic code, revealing the genomes’ ‌structure and comparison ‍with ⁣both contemporary and ancient populations.

Editor: With these‍ findings, what do you⁣ think the implications are for our understanding of human ⁤evolution?

Dr.⁢ Stein:‍ This research represents a vital piece of the​ puzzle in understanding our ancestry. Not only does‌ it confirm theories⁢ of migration and adaptation, but it⁣ also‍ highlights the complexity⁣ of early human societies. we now see that human evolution‌ was not a linear ‌process‍ but rather a branching tree​ of interactions with ⁣other hominins,shaping our genetic legacy today.

Editor: Very‍ insightful! What’s next for researchers in this ⁤field? ‍Are there more genomes ⁢left to uncover?

Dr. Stein: There is still‍ a‍ wealth of information in the⁢ past waiting ⁣to be​ uncovered! Researchers will⁢ likely focus on finding⁣ more samples across different regions and time periods to build a more⁤ comprehensive picture of human history. The technology continues to advance, ‌and each new ‌sequencing effort perhaps reveals more about our mysterious past.

Editor: Thank‍ you,​ Dr. ​Stein, for sharing your expertise on this ⁣compelling revelation.‍ It’s fascinating to see how these ‍ancient genomes inform our understanding ‍of who we are.

Dr. ‍Stein:‍ Thank you for having⁢ me!​ It’s an exciting time in evolutionary biology, and ⁢I look forward to sharing more findings as they come.

Editor: We look forward to that too!

You may also like

Leave a Comment