The reform advances so that the SSPC investigates and uses intelligence

by Laura Richards – Editor-in-Chief

The Public Security, Constitutional Points and First Legislative Studies Commissions‌ of the Senate unanimously approved with 31 votes the presidential initiative aimed at strengthening the powers and capabilities of the Secretariat for Security and Citizen Protection (SSPC), including the power crime investigation and coordination of the National Intelligence System in ⁢matters of ⁣Public Security.

The proposal amends Article 21 of the Magna Carta to establish that ​“the ⁤investigation of crimes is the ⁢responsibility ‌of the Public Prosecutor,⁣ the SSPC, ‍the National Guard and the police, within their jurisdiction, ‍who will act under the guidance and command of that‍ person in the exercise of his function”.

The Secretary of Security will formulate, coordinate​ and direct a national strategy, as well as their respective ​programs, policies and actions.

”It will ⁤help the President of the Republic in the exercise of functions relating to ‍national security; It will have the task of coordinating the national intelligence system in matters of public security,‌ within the terms ⁣established by law,⁤ and will be able‌ to coordinate the action of the three levels‌ of government through the institutions responsible for public security, which will have to provide the information provided on the matter ,⁤ in accordance with the law.”

The initiative provides for the guarantee ⁢of effective control and surveillance of federal funds intended for public safety.

The existence of the Executive‍ Secretariat ⁢of the National Public Security System is established, as ‌well as its general powers ‍to issue agreements, guidelines​ and carry out actions‌ that ⁢standardize standards of action, coordination and effective competition between the three levels of government.

“There are many claims in terms​ of security towards the past, on both ‍sides, when today what we must ​avoid is what happens, what happened last night in Cuautitlán Izcalli, in the State of Mexico, a massacre… a massacre of more than five people and more injured​ or, last night, if I’m ⁣not mistaken in Querétaro, this is what⁣ should no longer be there today, or what happened in Guerrero. Who talks about a municipal president of a⁤ corporate capital, who ‌was murdered and beheaded? (…) This is what we need ​to talk about, this is what needs to be stopped, the horror that is experienced in this country”, he explained.

”We are in‌ an extremely delicate situation in terms of transparency. We‍ cannot say that the numbers have ​decreased. The hugs and not bullets strategy doesn’t work. If we do not stop insecurity, it will continue to ⁤persist for​ generations to come. (…) This ⁤is why we are in favor of this‌ reform, but it is not ⁣enough, this reform is not enough,⁣ we must deepen it for the good of Mexico”, he expressed.

Luis‌ Donaldo Colosio, of MC, announced the favorable vote, ⁢but clarified that “the trust we place in this agency today, by voting in favor of this opinion, does⁢ not represent a blank check,​ he stated that the secretariat ⁢is called to transform and forever ‌“The way they investigate and‌ prosecute crimes⁤ combats impunity in our country.”

The opinion has been sent to the Board of Directors for presentation ‍in the plenary ⁣session, which will give its first reading on Tuesday. Prior⁢ to the session, Secretary García Harfuch​ will meet privately with the Morena bench of the Senate.

Interview Between Time.news ⁢Editor and Security Expert on New Legislative Initiative

Time.news Editor (TNE): ​ Thank you for⁤ joining⁤ us today, Dr. Martinez. The recent approval by the Senate commissions ⁣regarding the presidential‌ initiative to strengthen the powers of ‌the Secretariat for Security and Citizen Protection (SSPC) is making headlines. Can you explain⁢ the ⁢main objective⁤ of this ⁢initiative?

Dr. Carla Martinez (CM): Thank you for having me. The primary objective of this ⁢initiative is to enhance the capabilities⁢ and resources of the SSPC, particularly in crime investigation and coordination of⁢ the National Intelligence​ System in matters ⁢of public security. This is significant as it ‍aims ​to⁤ create a more unified ⁣and effective approach ⁢to tackling crime across different levels of⁤ government.

TNE: The initiative amends Article ​21 of​ the Constitution,⁢ which now ⁣designates ‌a more active⁤ role for the SSPC. How do you think this change will impact the relationship between ​the​ SSPC and other law ​enforcement agencies?

CM: This amendment is crucial because it establishes a clear ⁤command structure. The SSPC ⁢will‍ now⁢ provide guidance to the⁢ Public Prosecutor’s Office, the National Guard, and local police⁤ within their jurisdiction. Such a framework‌ could⁢ improve coordination and reduce fragmentation in law enforcement efforts, leading to more effective crime‍ prevention and response strategies.

TNE: There’s mention of the Secretary of Security‍ formulating⁢ a national⁢ strategy for public safety. ‍What do you believe⁣ are the key elements that this strategy should focus ‌on to be effective?

CM: An effective national‍ strategy should prioritize intelligence-led policing, community engagement,⁢ and comprehensive ⁢training ⁤for law ‍enforcement personnel. Additionally, it should address the root causes ⁤of crime, incorporating‍ social programs ⁢that focus on education⁤ and employment opportunities to mitigate factors that lead to‌ criminal activity. Coordination ⁢among federal, state, and municipal forces will also be essential.

TNE: It appears the initiative⁢ also aims to enforce ⁣strict control over federal​ funds intended for public safety. How crucial do you think financial oversight is in this context?

CM: Financial oversight is vital. Ensuring that federal funds are used efficiently can‌ help build public trust and accountability in‌ the police system. It can also⁤ ensure that resources are allocated ‍where ​they are most⁤ needed, ultimately enhancing operational effectiveness. Transparency in the ‍spending of these funds⁣ is essential to preventing corruption and mismanagement.

TNE: ⁢The initiative‌ establishes the⁣ Executive Secretariat of⁤ the National ​Public Security System. What role do you see this body playing in the broader context‌ of national security?

CM: The Executive Secretariat will be pivotal in standardizing policies ​and protocols‌ across various jurisdictions. By issuing agreements and guidelines, it can⁣ help to unify efforts and ensure ‍that all ​levels ​of government​ are working ‌towards ⁣common objectives⁤ in public security. This can lead ⁣to more ‍effective collaborations and better resource-sharing among federal, state, and local entities.

TNE: Lastly, there have ⁤been criticisms and claims regarding security issues ⁤from the past. How⁤ important is‍ it⁤ for the current ​administration to address historical ‌grievances while implementing these new measures?

CM: ‍ Addressing ‌historical grievances is essential for building trust between law enforcement and communities. For the ​current administration, it’s​ important to‍ learn from past mistakes to avoid repeating them. Ensuring community input in ​the policymaking ⁢process and promoting transparency can help create a more inclusive and responsive security framework. This will not only improve ‍public security but also enhance the legitimacy and credibility of law enforcement agencies.

TNE: Dr. Martinez, thank you for your‍ insights. It’s clear that the⁢ road ahead ​for⁤ public ‌security⁣ in our country is​ complex but ⁣promising with these new​ changes.

CM: Thank​ you for having me. It will certainly ‌be interesting to observe‍ how these changes unfold in practice.

You may also like

Leave a Comment