The Russian Oreshnik missile changed the course of wars and shaped the world forever

by times news cr

Professor at the University of Helsinki and geopolitical ​expert⁢ Thomas Malinin pointed out that “Russia’s first launch of the new Oreshnik missile led to a change in the balance of ​power in the world.”

The expert wrote in his account on the⁢ “X” platform: “The‌ Russian test on November 21 may have changed the course of the war and the ‌world forever. “There is bound to be ⁣panic in NATO, ‌which is not good for⁤ anyone.”

The Russian Ambassador to London: Britain’s policy towards⁢ Ukraine could lead to a conflict between the nuclear powers

The Russian Ambassador to Britain, Andrei Kelin, confirmed that “Britain’s policy regarding Ukraine and arms supplies could lead to increased strategic risks and the outbreak of a conflict between nuclear powers.”

Kelin told the Rossiya 24⁤ TV channel: “I would like to point out ⁤that the British⁢ completely ignored all the warning signals from‌ our ⁤side and moved to sharp escalatory⁤ measures‌ to deepen the Ukrainian crisis. This, of course, is fraught⁢ with ‌increased strategic⁢ risks⁣ and, in the worst case, a ‍conflict between nuclear powers. We believe that Britain “The ‍Great Power, like other countries, ⁤is now involved with Ukraine in an armed conflict against us.”

He​ stressed that the ⁤launch of the ‌“Oreshnik” ⁤left a “very dangerous” impression on the British peopel, despite continued talk that London⁢ had known about⁢ such weapons for a long time.

on November 21, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that “Russian forces carried out a accomplished test‌ of the latest hypersonic, medium-range, multi-warhead, ​non-nuclear missile system named “Oreshnik.”


Suggest a correction


How could the international community respond to the advancements in missile technology demonstrated by Russia?

Interview: The Implications of⁣ Russia’s Oreshnik Missile Launch with Professor Thomas ​Malinin

Time.news Editor: Today,⁤ we​ have the ​privilege of speaking with Professor Thomas Malinin, a geopolitical expert from the University of Helsinki, ​to discuss the recent developments surrounding Russia’s launch of ‌the Oreshnik missile and it’s ‌broader implications. Thank you for joining us,Professor Malinin.

Professor malinin: Thank⁢ you for having me. It’s a pleasure to share insights on such a critical topic.

Time.news Editor: Your recent statement emphasized that russia’s test of the Oreshnik missile could lead to a notable shift in the balance of power globally. Can you elaborate ​on what you meant by that?

Professor Malinin: ⁤ Certainly. The Oreshnik missile, a hypersonic medium-range system, represents a leap in military technology. Its successful test signifies Russia’s growing capabilities, possibly altering the strategic calculations of not just NATO but othre global ⁤players as well.This change can induce panic within NATO—such responses may not be conducive to ‌stability⁢ or security for any ⁤parties involved.

Time.news Editor: You mentioned the potential for panic in NATO. How do you think this could manifest in terms of policy changes or military strategy?

Professor‍ Malinin: ⁢ It could lead​ to a few outcomes,such ‍as an⁢ increased military presence in Eastern Europe or heightened defenses in member states bordering ⁤Russia.NATO may also prioritize developing their own hypersonic‍ capabilities ‌in response, further escalating tensions. This kind of arms race is what I believe ‍is notably alarming; it increases the likelihood of miscalculations and, potentially, conflict.

Time.news Editor: Speaking of ‌conflict, the Russian Ambassador to the UK⁤ suggested that Britain’s policy towards Ukraine increases the risk of a nuclear conflict. How significant do you think that assertion is in the current geopolitical climate?

Professor Malinin: It’s indeed significant. The Ambassador’s remarks underline ​the precarious situation where actions taken by Western allies may be interpreted as escalatory by Russia. there is an intricate web of strategic ⁤risks; decisions made by countries like Britain must ⁣take these ramifications into account. The more involved nations are in⁢ Ukraine’s conflict, the greater the chance of unintended consequences arising, which ⁤could ⁤have catastrophic outcomes.

Time.news editor: Given this tense atmosphere, ⁣what ‌practical advice would you offer to policymakers who are navigating ‍these⁣ challenges?

Professor Malinin: I would advise‌ them to prioritize dialog and diplomacy while being aware of the military dynamics at play. Open channels of dialogue⁢ can⁤ help⁤ de-escalate tensions and allow for a better understanding of each party’s intentions. additionally, ⁤it’s essential to promote ⁣transparency regarding military capabilities to avoid misunderstandings that could spiral into ⁤conflict.

Time.news Editor: Thank you for those insights, professor Malinin.In closing, what should the general public understand about the implications of missile tests like the Oreshnik on international stability?

Professor Malinin: The public needs to recognize that developments like the Oreshnik launch are not just technical assessments; they have profound implications for global security. Awareness of these events can foster informed discussions about foreign policy and national defense. An informed citizenry is crucial,particularly as the stakes rise ⁢in ⁢a world where nuclear capabilities are involved.

Time.news Editor: Thank ‍you again for your time, Professor ‌Malinin.Your expertise sheds much-needed light on this pressing ​issue.

Professor‌ Malinin: It was my pleasure. Thank you for the thoughtful conversation.

You may also like

Leave a Comment