According to JK’s decision, the manager’s actions went against the research ban and could be seen as censorship or obstruction. JK formally criticized both the region and the manager involved. JK emphasized the importance of freedom of communication as a means to protect freedom of speech and information in society, especially for those who represent an authority or a public body. JK viewed the situation as serious. To learn more, read JK’s appeal of the SVT verdict on “Vaccine Warriors.”
The manager’s actions were incompatible with the grounds for the research ban and can be perceived as censorship or an obstructing measure, JK writes in its decision and directs formal criticism at both the region and the manager concerned.
“It is fundamental that whoever represents an authority or a public body especially considers the great importance of freedom of communication as a safeguard for freedom of speech and information in our society”, notes JK, who takes a serious view of what happened.
Read more:
JK appeals SVT verdict on “Vaccine Warriors”