2024-03-07 14:34:21
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has expressed strong displeasure over the casual approach adopted in filing the petition. The Supreme Court said that it will not tolerate that the special leave petition was filed in a casual manner. It is clear from the facts that the ground given in the appeal filed in this case has been taken from some other petition. The Supreme Court, while rejecting the application, has imposed a compensation of Rs 10,000 on the advocate on record. The court said that the grounds enumerated for filing the special leave petition are not correct and misleading.
Advocate accepted the mistake
This petition for anticipatory bail was filed before a bench led by Justice AS Oka. After not getting relief from Patna High Court, this special leave petition was filed in the Supreme Court. A case of causing grievous hurt has been registered against the accused. The Supreme Court said that the grounds in the appeal prepared by the petitioner’s lawyer in the case are not correct. Advocate on record admitted that this ground was inserted by mistake. However, the Supreme Court said that the charge sheet has been filed against the accused and hence his custody is not required and he is granted bail.
State compensation in exchange for land acquisition is not charity, why did the Supreme Court say this?
Hearing postponed in Dabua flats case
EWS flats built in Dabua, Faridabad are to be given to the displaced people of Khori. The Municipal Corporation had submitted the maintenance report of these flats to the Supreme Court in July last year. On March 5, a hearing was to be held in the Supreme Court on the issue of Khori displaced people who have not yet received the allotment of flats. Now the hearing has been postponed to the next date. Along with this, structural audit of Dabua flats was to be done by IIT Delhi, which the corporation has not been able to do till now. There was also a hearing on this.