Doctor of political sciences, professor Vahe Davtyan presented clarifications regarding the NPP.
He wrote on his Facebook page: ”Since the emergency disconnection of the Armenian NPP from the power system has created a reason for many emotional comments, let me make some clarifications.
First of all, I do not rule out any conspiracy. But professional objectivity makes me believe that the official version of the lightning strike is not far from the truth. Almost every year, nuclear power plants are shut down due to lightning strikes in Russia and China, France, Japan, South Korea, etc.
The averaged image is as follows. lightning strikes the overhead line, the protection system activates, causing the generator to shut down, and it usually takes several days to restore the facility.
The conservation of the NPP does not take place in an instant. It is a time-consuming and expensive process. According to estimates, the conservation of the Armenian NPP can cost up to 400-450 million US dollars. Note that in Germany there are 17 NPPs conservation and dismantling was estimated at 18 billion euros.
“Of course, the Armenian “peaceful atom” is facing many geopolitical risks today. However, it is necessary to clearly understand that the NPP is a complex technological object, the conservation of which will not happen with the push of a button.”
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/ru_RU/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.6&appId=403315783090535”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=429534133762584”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
What are the main safety concerns associated with the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant?
Time.news Interview: Understanding the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant Incident
Editor: Welcome, Professor Vahe Davtyan. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent emergency disconnection of the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant (NPP).
Vahe Davtyan: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: The incident has sparked a wave of emotional reactions and conspiracy theories online. You mentioned on your Facebook that while you don’t rule out the possibility of a conspiracy, the official explanation regarding a lightning strike seems plausible. Can you elaborate on that?
Vahe Davtyan: Certainly. It’s understandable that people are quick to jump to conclusions, especially given the sensitive nature of nuclear power and its implications for both safety and national security. However, my years of experience in the field of political sciences and observations of similar incidents lead me to believe that natural causes, like lightning strikes, are often behind such shutdowns. In fact, other countries, such as Russia and China, have faced similar disruptions almost annually due to weather-related incidents.
Editor: So, you believe it’s more of a technical issue rather than a deliberate act?
Vahe Davtyan: Exactly. While we should remain vigilant to the potential for conspiracies—especially given the geopolitical landscape in the region—I think it’s crucial for us to approach this with an objective lens. The operational integrity of nuclear facilities is critical, and they are designed to withstand various natural occurrences. Although lightning strikes can be damaging, there are systems in place to mitigate these risks.
Editor: That makes sense. Some have suggested that this incident reflects broader issues surrounding the safety and reliability of the NPP. What is your take on the overall condition of the Armenian NPP?
Vahe Davtyan: That’s a pertinent question. The Armenian NPP has been a topic of debate for many years. Infrastructure, age, and maintenance practices can all impact the reliability of nuclear power plants. Various assessments point to the need for ongoing investment and modernization efforts to ensure that safety standards are maintained. We need a transparent dialogue about the plant’s condition, so people can feel reassured about their safety.
Editor: A lack of transparency could certainly fuel conspiracy theories. In your opinion, what steps should the government take to address public concerns and enhance trust in the NPP?
Vahe Davtyan: Transparency is key. The government should provide regular updates and detailed reports on the NPP’s status, safety protocols, and emergency preparedness measures. Public forums where experts explain the complexities of nuclear safety in layman’s terms could also help demystify the technology and build trust. Incorporating community feedback will foster a cooperative atmosphere where citizens feel their concerns are heard and addressed.
Editor: That sounds like a proactive approach. As we look forward, what do you think are the biggest challenges that the Armenian NPP will face in the coming years?
Vahe Davtyan: There are several challenges on the horizon. Geopolitical tensions in the region mean that energy security will be increasingly prioritized. Additionally, the global shift towards renewable energy sources presents both an opportunity and a challenge for nuclear energy. Embracing new technology and best practices in nuclear safety while integrating with renewable efforts will be essential. Balancing these interests, while ensuring public confidence, will be crucial for the future of the Armenian NPP.
Editor: Thank you for sharing your insights, Professor Davtyan. It seems that while the lightning strike may have temporarily disrupted operations, it also opens the door for deeper discussions about energy policy, safety, and public engagement in Armenia.
Vahe Davtyan: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss these important issues. It’s crucial that we all stay informed and engaged in these conversations as they will shape our future.
Editor: Absolutely. We appreciate your time today and look forward to your continued contributions to this important dialogue.