Barriers to Trauma-Informed Care in Psychiatric Settings Highlight Critical Need for Systemic Change
Table of Contents
A new literature review, published online October 21, 2025, underscores the significant challenges in implementing trauma-informed care within acute psychiatric inpatient facilities, identifying vicarious trauma, organizational barriers, and coercive practices as key obstacles. The findings, appearing in Mental Health Practice, emphasize the urgent need for systemic changes to improve both patient outcomes and staff well-being.
The Promise and Peril of Trauma-Informed Care
Trauma-informed care is a framework that recognizes the pervasive impact of past trauma on mental health. It aims to integrate this understanding into all aspects of mental health practice, prioritizing the prevention of re-traumatization. While the benefits of this approach are widely acknowledged, researchers Matthew Kelly, a mental health nurse at St. James’s Hospital in Dublin, Ireland, and Philip James, an assistant professor at Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, found that translating theory into practice remains a substantial hurdle.
Three Core Barriers to Implementation
The review identified three primary barriers hindering the widespread adoption of trauma-informed care in adult inpatient psychiatric settings.
Vicarious Trauma and Staff Resilience
Repeated exposure to patient distress takes a significant toll on mental health professionals, leading to vicarious trauma. This phenomenon negatively impacts staff resilience, potentially contributing to burnout and decreased effectiveness. Addressing this requires proactive support systems for staff, including opportunities for debriefing, supervision, and self-care.
Organizational Roadblocks
Beyond the emotional burden, significant organizational barriers impede progress. These include inadequate leadership support, insufficient resources, and a lack of comprehensive staff training. Without dedicated investment in these areas, the capacity of staff to deliver truly trauma-informed care is severely compromised. A senior official stated that “sustainable change requires a commitment from the top down, coupled with tangible resources to support staff development.”
The Conflict with Coercive Practices
Perhaps the most fundamental challenge lies in the inherent conflict between trauma-informed care and common practices within inpatient settings, such as restraint and seclusion. These coercive practices, while sometimes deemed necessary for safety, directly contradict the principles of empowerment, safety, and collaboration central to a trauma-informed approach.
The Path Forward: Prioritizing Research and Systemic Solutions
The authors emphasize that addressing these barriers is not merely desirable, but crucial for improving the quality of care provided to individuals with mental health challenges. Future research should focus on identifying and evaluating strategies to overcome these obstacles. The study, which underwent external double-blind peer review and plagiarism checks, highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach that prioritizes staff well-being, resource allocation, and a fundamental shift away from coercive practices.
Correspondence regarding this research can be directed to [email protected]. The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Kelly M, James P (2025) Exploring the barriers to implementing trauma-informed care in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: a literature review. Mental Health Practice. doi: 10.7748/mhp.2025.e1751.
Ultimately, the successful implementation of trauma-informed care demands a sustained commitment to creating a therapeutic environment that prioritizes safety, trust, and empowerment for both patients and staff.
