WASHINGTON, June 15, 2025 – Former President Donald Trump reportedly vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to U.S. officials.
Tensions between Israel and Iran are flaring, with Trump’s intervention adding another layer to the volatile situation.
- Trump blocked an Israeli plan to kill Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei.
- Israel has launched strikes against Iran, resulting in casualties.
- Trump called for a deal between Israel and Iran.
The revelation underscores the complex dynamics at play in the Middle East, where the former president’s actions continue to impact international relations. What role did Trump play in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran? U.S. officials told reuters and The Associated Press that the former president rejected the proposed assassination plan in recent days, further complicating the already tense situation.
The Vetoed Plan
The Israeli government brought its plan to the Trump administration, but the former president refused, an anonymous U.S.official told the AP. “Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No.until they do we’re not even talking about going after the political leadership,” another anonymous U.S. official told Reuters, which first reported the news on June 15, 2025.
When asked about the plot on Fox News’ Special Report with Bret Baier, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu declined to comment. He did add, “But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we’ll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States.”
Escalating Conflict
Israel has launched strikes against Iran, leading to significant casualties.According to Washington-based Human Rights Activists,the AP reported that at least 406 people have been killed and 654 wounded.Israel opened with a strike on an Iranian nuclear facility Friday that killed a number of top generals and nuclear scientists. In retaliation, Iran launched missile strikes on Israel.
Israel’s government said that 14 people have been killed in strikes since Friday and another 390 have been wounded.
Casualty Summary:
- Iran: At least 406 killed, 654 wounded
- Israel: 14 killed, 390 wounded
Trump’s Reaction
On sunday, Trump commented on the escalating conflict in a message on Truth Social. He wrote, “Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal,” taking credit for recent de-escalation between India and Pakistan. He added, “We will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran! Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that’s OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!”
In a post hours earlier, Trump said the United States “had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight.”
“If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before,” he threatened.
Key Quote: “Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal.” – Donald Trump on Truth Social
Calls for De-escalation
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has stated that if Israel stops its assault, “our responses will also stop.”
Netanyahu said Sunday that Israel will halt its attacks if Iran agrees to U.S. demands that the nation dismantle its nuclear capabilities.he also called the Iranian regime “very weak.”
“The issue here is stopping those things that will threaten our survival. And we’re committed to stopping them, and I think we can achieve them,” Netanyahu said on Fox News. “Now,if they are willing to accept President Trump’s terms,that’s another matter.”
Trump has said that “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon” and “can’t have enrichment.”
If Iran does not agree to Trump’s demands, then Netanyahu said the conflict will “end when we remove those capacities, and we will.”
The Broader Implications of Trump’s Intervention
Beyond the immediate crisis, Donald Trump’s intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict raises crucial questions about the U.S.’s role in the region and the future of international diplomacy. The veto of the assassination plan, coupled with his public statements, suggests a complex, and at times contradictory, approach to Middle Eastern policy. Trump’s actions demonstrate a continued commitment to influencing the volatile region, even after leaving office. He seems driven by a desire to broker a deal.
Trump’s stance,as evidenced by the existing details,appears to prioritize a negotiated settlement,even as he publicly acknowledges the potential for escalating military action. His insistence on Iran dismantling its nuclear capabilities,coupled with his willingness to consider a deal,reveals a pragmatic,though perhaps unconventional,diplomatic strategy. This marks a significant departure from the previous governance’s approach and signals a shift in the balance of power in the region.
Shifting Alliances and Public Opinion
The conflict has also exposed divisions within Trump’s base. Some key figures question Israeli strikes and warn against a U.S.war with Iran [[3]]. This divergence in opinion reflects broader debates about America’s role in global conflicts and the value of customary alliances.
The potential for the U.S. to get involved in the conflict is a significant concern. Trump himself acknowledged this possibility. “It’s possible” the U.S. would get involved, he stated [[2]]. This uncertainty underscores the precariousness of the situation and the potential for a wider, more devastating war in the Middle East.
Possible Outcomes and Challenges
The future of the conflict depends on several factors, including Iran’s response to Israeli strikes, the willingness of both sides to negotiate, and the level of U.S. involvement. The situation
Table of Contents
