Ukraine“>Russia y Ukraine launched notable drone attacks, both sides denounced, despite the fact that in a conversation between Vladimir Putin y Donald Trumpthe latter would have asked the Russian president to avoid causing an escalation in Ukraine, according to the press.
According to the Washington Post, Both leaders spoke about the goal of peace on the European continent.
You may be interested: Zelensky confirms ‘the first combats’ of Ukraine against North Korean soldiers
The newspaper, which cited sources who spoke under anonymity, They indicated that the Republican reminded the Russian president of the large military presence of the United States in Europe.
Likewise, the president-elect expressed interest in future conversations to discuss “the solution” to the conflict in Ukraine “soon”.
You may be interested: Mexico-US relationship with Trump will face “small crises”
While the war does not give up, the Kremlin He considered that the New York magnate gave “positive signals” regarding the resolution of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
“The signs are positive. Trump, during his election campaign, he said that he sees all this (the Ukraine conflict) through agreements. And that he can achieve an agreement that leads to peace,” said the spokesman for the Russian presidency, Dmitri Peskov, in an interview with state media.
For its part, the Russian Ministry of Defense indicated that it shot down 34 Ukrainian drones aimed at the region of Moscow, the largest attack against the Russian capital since the start of the conflict on February 24, 2022.
You may be interested: In Russia, forces Ukrainian They have first clash with North Korean troops
According to the same source, another 36 drones were shot down in two bordering regions of Moscow and in three other borders of Ukraine.
The attack, which forced the temporary closure of three Moscow airports, injured a 52-year-old woman and caused the fire of two homes in the town of Rámenskoye, in the Moscow region, according to authorities.
Sunday morning, Ukraine was the target of a new “record” attack with 145 Russian drones, Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelensky denounced in X.
You may be interested: Trump returns to the White House
The Ukrainian air forces indicated, in a statement, that 62 of the 145 drones were neutralized over 13 regions of the country.
four days ago, Moscow launched a massive drone attack against the Ukrainian capital, which has been the target of almost daily offensives for a month.
Related
What role does international diplomacy play in de-escalating the Russia-Ukraine conflict as discussed in the interview with Dr. Elena Vasilyeva?
Interview between Time.news Editor and International Relations Expert Dr. Elena Vasilyeva
Time.news Editor: Welcome, Dr. Vasilyeva. It’s great to have you here to discuss the recent developments in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, particularly regarding the drone attacks and the recent conversations between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. What is your take on the current situation?
Dr. Elena Vasilyeva: Thank you for having me! The recent escalation with drone attacks from both Russia and Ukraine is reflective of the ongoing complexities in the conflict. Each side is not only trying to assert dominance but also control the narrative surrounding international perceptions of the war.
Editor: Indeed, the Washington Post reported that during a conversation, Trump emphasized the importance of avoiding escalation. Do you believe his involvement could shift the dynamics of the conflict?
Dr. Vasilyeva: Trump’s approach as outlined in those talks could introduce a sense of diplomacy that’s been lacking. If he follows through with engagement on resolving the conflict—highlighting the U.S. military presence in Europe as a counterbalance—this could potentially deter further aggression from Russia. However, it heavily depends on whether these conversations translate into concrete actions and commitments.
Editor: The Kremlin’s response was that they perceived positive signals from Trump regarding peace negotiations. How should we interpret this response?
Dr. Vasilyeva: The Kremlin is always keen to spin narratives that appear favorable. By framing Trump’s remarks as positive, they seek to legitimize their stance and perhaps soften their international image amidst increasing scrutiny. However, the reality on the ground, as you’ve noted, with continuous drone attacks indicates that words alone are insufficient without credible steps towards de-escalation.
Editor: Zelensky recently confirmed the first skirmishes involving North Korean troops. How does this development impact the overall geopolitical landscape?
Dr. Vasilyeva: Involving North Korean soldiers adds a new layer of complexity. It showcases Russia’s willingness to draw on alliances with states that have their own contentious relationships with the West. This not only complicates the Ukraine situation but raises concerns about broader geopolitical stability in the region. Countries will be watching how this alignment plays out, especially with respect to military support and international sanctions.
Editor: Returning to Trump’s potential role, how likely is it that he can facilitate any significant change once he is in office again?
Dr. Vasilyeva: It’s a double-edged sword. While Trump’s “deal-making” rhetoric could foster initial dialogues, there’s skepticism about his capacity to enact profound policy changes, especially regarding a conflict as complex as Ukraine. The U.S. foreign policy establishment has its own set of interests that often don’t align perfectly with an individual leader’s agenda.
Editor: Lastly, given the backdrop of drone warfare, do you see any path towards a peaceful resolution in the near future?
Dr. Vasilyeva: It’s challenging. Both sides maintain significant military capabilities and ideological motivations that fuel the conflict. However, if serious negotiations are pursued and come with mutual concessions, a pathway to peace can emerge. It will take careful orchestration from all involved, not just the U.S., but also European partners who have their stakes in the outcome. The desire for peace will need to outweigh the appetite for territorial gain or military victories.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Vasilyeva, for your insights. The situation remains fluid, and it will be interesting to see how these developments unfold.
Dr. Vasilyeva: Thank you for having me. I look forward to discussing this evolving situation further as it progresses.