With rising prices and one of two Social Security trust funds projected to become insolvent by 2032, a comfortable retirement feels increasingly out of reach for millions of Americans. President Donald Trump unveiled a plan during his State of the Union address on Tuesday to address this growing concern, proposing a new retirement savings account for the roughly 54 million American adults who currently lack access to employer-sponsored retirement plans. The core of the proposal involves a federal matching contribution, potentially up to $1,000 per year, designed to incentivize saving among those who have historically been excluded from traditional retirement systems.
But the success of this initiative hinges on overcoming a deep-seated skepticism among the very population it aims to support. Many low-income workers, having been left out of the retirement savings landscape for their entire careers, approach such proposals with caution. “They want to know what the catch is,” explained Teresa Ghilarducci, a professor of economics at The New School and an advisor on the development of the plan, in an interview with Fortune. This distrust isn’t unfounded; past attempts at similar programs, like the Obama administration’s MyRA, faced significant hurdles and ultimately fell short of their goals.
A History of Distrust and Failed Initiatives
The skepticism Ghilarducci describes stems from a long history of financial exclusion and a lack of confidence in systems perceived as benefiting others more than themselves. The MyRA program, launched in 2015, aimed to provide a simple, low-cost retirement savings option for workers without employer-sponsored plans. However, despite a relatively straightforward enrollment process – requiring only a website visit and a checkbox – the program was shuttered after just two years, with approximately 30,000 newly opened accounts closed by the Department of Treasury. The reason? It was deemed “not cost-effective,” according to a Treasury Department press release.
This outcome reinforced a prevailing sentiment among many low-income earners: that retirement savings programs aren’t designed for them. Ghilarducci argues that for a significant portion of the workforce, “their money is safer in a shoe box under the bed than We see in an IRA” due to the burden of monthly fees. The Trump administration’s plan attempts to address this concern directly by offering a matching contribution, a feature absent in the MyRA program. This direct financial incentive, Ghilarducci believes, is crucial for encouraging participation.
The Power of a Match
“If you have systems where low-income people get a direct match, and they can actually see their money grow in any significant way, participation goes way up,” Ghilarducci said. The matching contribution, capped at $1,000 annually, is intended to provide an immediate and tangible benefit, demonstrating the value of saving and building a nest egg. This contrasts with the MyRA, which lacked such an incentive and relied on voluntary participation.
Economists have estimated that a plan similar to Trump’s could significantly benefit lower-income Americans, potentially helping the poorest 25% save between $138,000 and $610,000 for retirement. However, even with these potential savings, the question remains: is it enough?
The Retirement Gap: A Stark Reality
According to a recent survey by BlackRock, the average American believes they will need approximately $2.1 million to retire comfortably. In reality, the average 401(k) balance stood at just $144,400 in the third quarter of 2025, according to Fidelity Investments. “Almost no one is close” to that amount, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink stated in a letter to shareholders last year.
Ghilarducci, a younger Baby Boomer herself, has witnessed firsthand the shortcomings of the current retirement system. “I honestly thought that we would have a much more expanded private sector plan and bigger social security benefit by the time I’m retiring, and I’ve just watched the system get worse and worse,” she said. The disparity in access to retirement plans is stark: 78.7% of full-time workers in the lowest-earning decile do not have access to a plan, compared to just 18.2% in the highest-earning decile, according to the Economic Innovation Group.
While Ghilarducci supports the Trump administration’s plan, she believes a more generous matching contribution would be even more effective. She hopes Congress will consider increasing the match to further incentivize participation and ensure that low-income workers have a meaningful opportunity to build a secure retirement. “This represents an architecture, a design, where they have the best chance of putting some money in their accounts early in their life, keep it there and then,” she explained. “When you do that, you take advantage of the magic of math, because compound interest kind of takes over for the workers’ contribution.”
The administration has indicated that the plan can be implemented using existing administrative authorities, potentially bypassing the need for congressional approval. However, the long-term success of the program will likely depend on broader economic factors and continued political support. The next step will be the release of further details regarding the program’s implementation, which White House officials have said will be forthcoming “soon,” according to CNN.
Disclaimer: This article provides information regarding retirement savings plans and is for general knowledge purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
What do you think about the proposed retirement plan? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and please share this article with anyone who might discover it helpful.
Worth a look
