Florence, February 9, 2026 — A legal battle is brewing over Paolo Virzì’s latest film, Five seconds, as the heir to a historic Tuscan family is seeking to block its distribution and claim damages. The dispute centers on a character in the film, Matilde Guelfi Camaiani, who the family alleges is based on a real-life countess and portrayed in a damaging light.
Family Legacy at Stake in Film Dispute
The lawsuit claims the film misrepresents the family’s history, depicting them as financially ruined and involved in criminal activity.
The claimant, granddaughter of Countess Matilde Guelfi Camaiani, filed suit against Greenboo Production srl and Indiana Production srl, alleging a violation of the family’s good name. According to the legal filing, the film portrays the family as “fallen nobles, involved in events of financial ruin, drug use, crimes, suicide and psychiatric problems.” The family asserts there was no agreement reached regarding the use of their name or story.
As a preliminary measure, the heir requested the Florentine court to halt the film’s distribution, citing “the injury of the right to one’s personal identity and to the confidentiality of one’s existence and family history.” However, Judge Carolina Dini of the first civil section of the Court of Florence recently rejected this request, though the case will proceed to a full hearing in the coming weeks.
The court will determine whether the film infringes upon the heir’s rights and whether compensation for damages is warranted. The production companies initially won this round, with the judge noting that the film is presented “as a work of fiction, the overall result of the artistic creativity of the authors.”
The judge’s order referenced the standard disclaimer found in many films: “The facts and characters narrated and/or represented in this film are absolutely imaginary and the fruit of the authors’ imagination. Any reference to real or living people and to actual events is purely random.”
The Florentine Court reasoned that the film’s repeated disclaimers sufficiently convey its fictional nature, lessening the risk that viewers will perceive the depicted story as factual. “Therefore, the requirements for the granting of precautionary protection are not considered to exist,” the court stated. Nevertheless, the legal proceedings will continue to address the core issues of the case.
- A member of a Tuscan noble family is suing over the film Five seconds.
- The lawsuit alleges the film damages the family’s reputation.
- A Florentine court has, for now, allowed the film’s distribution to continue.
- The case will proceed to a full hearing to determine if damages are owed.
What constitutes fair use of a real person’s story in a fictional work? This case raises complex questions about the balance between artistic license and the protection of personal and family reputations.
Subscribe to the Corriere Fiorentino newsletter
