We urge you to withdraw your investments from the Amulsar gold mine project of Lydian company. RBJ appeals to investors

by times news cr

We, the concerned citizens ‌of Armenia,​ are writing to you with a call to ⁢withdraw your investment/funding⁤ from the Amulsar mining ​project implemented‌ by Lydian Company.

You are certainly familiar with ‍Lydian ​Corporation’s interest in operating a gold ⁢mine in Amulsar. As ‌investors/lenders ⁣of ⁢this business plan, you have received thousands of signatures on change.org calling for your⁢ funding ⁣to⁤ be​ stopped, and you should be aware that throughout its life the mine project has faced resistance‍ because it poses major ⁣health risks to the‍ local population. and threatens ‍the region’s natural⁣ environment. Moreover, opponents of the mine have⁣ continuously warned of ‍serious negative economic consequences in the long term, as the region will⁢ be completely deprived of job‌ opportunities and flora and fauna will be destroyed. At the same time, it is the local residents ⁢who will bear the unbearable burden of surviving alongside the mine ‍shafts, waste ⁢heaps and ‍empty rock piles. There is no‍ reliable and accurate data that mining in Amulsar will⁤ not negatively affect Jermuk’s underground water sources. the same waters that have been used for medicinal purposes for decades. Located in the catchment area of ​​Lake Sevan, the mine also poses a risk of ‍pollution​ to the region’s largest water body,⁣ Lake Sevan. These‍ are problems passed down from generation to generation, which will continue to exist even when any of⁣ the Armenians⁢ living today will not be alive for a⁣ long time.

It should be emphasized that⁤ the opinion of the largest affected community,​ the⁢ citizens of Jermuk, about the‍ exploitation of a mine in their vicinity ⁢was never taken into account. And other communities, such as the village of⁣ Gndevaz, have‍ expressed⁢ their disagreement with the project since 2011, understanding very​ well the risk of permanent loss ⁤of their fertile agricultural lands as⁤ a result of the mine’s operation. In 2014, local residents appealed ​to the financial institutions‍ investing in the ​Amulsar project, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and ‍the European Bank for Reconstruction and ‌Development⁤ (EBRD), ‍to⁢ end their support for⁤ the mine. The Office of the IFC Compliance Advisor (IFC Ombudsman) found that Lydian did ⁤not ⁤comply with IFC ⁢standards on several occasions. Regardless of​ this⁤ circumstance, in 2017 The IFC withdrew from the project, while ⁣the ‌EBRD continued to participate in this mining project ​and did not address complaints. Since⁣ 2015, several‍ lawsuits ‍have been filed against⁤ the mine project, both by community residents and ​environmental NGOs, whose proceedings are still ‍ongoing.

Since​ June 2018, when faith in democratic values ​​was revived after the revolution in the country, residents ⁤of the surrounding⁤ communities of Amulsar took the initiative and blocked the roads leading to the mine.​ Since⁢ November 2018, they have also ​democratically organized petitions and confirmed through council resolutions ⁢that they are against⁤ metal‍ mining in their communities.

of the problems raised by the Armenian​ and foreign legal and scientific fields, in particular, that the‌ necessary⁢ procedures were not followed ‍in the Environmental and Social ⁣Impact Assessment (ESIA) and Environmental Impact Assessment⁢ (EIA), the RA government decided to hire​ foreign organizations to study‍ Lydian’s original‍ EIA/ESIA documents. In ⁣2019, within⁣ the framework of the criminal case initiated by the RA Investigative Committee. In January, a contract ⁣was signed with the Lebanese ELARD and the American TRC companies.

2019 In​ June, ‍ELARD-TRC provided an Environmental and Social‍ Impact ⁤Assessment Study,‌ an independent 3rd party assessment of ⁤water ‌resources and geology, biodiversity⁣ and air, with shocking findings. The ELARD-TRC studies clearly ‌showed that the ⁣original EIA was full‌ of omissions, conflicting data, inaccuracies, incorrect or‍ false ⁣reporting, and included other fabricated ⁢data, which, taken as a whole, could best be described ⁤as “unscientific”. In⁤ response to the government’s question, “Given the location of Amulsar, its geographical position, the surrounding settlements and⁢ health resorts,‌ can open pit mining, the ‍presence of a leach pile and a waste rock fill be considered⁤ safe, and if not, what kind of environmental ⁣damage could it cause?” to cause ‍it”, the answer of ELARD-TRC is as follows.‍ “The EIA/ESIA evaluations are ⁤incomplete, the relevant conclusions are unreliable. Therefore,⁢ the question ​whether the general operation of the mine can⁤ be generally considered⁢ safe‌ cannot be​ answered. We suggest you read ‌the ‍study:[1] to confirm the rather sharp ⁣accusations we have quoted.

The ELARD-TRC study, commissioned ‍by the Committee ⁤of Inquiry, details page​ after page​ of inaccuracies in the scientific procedures that really call into question the​ feasibility of the⁣ program. ⁣It also proves that the audit reports once ordered by Lydian to comply with IFC⁤ standards (for example, ‌prepared by Knight⁤ Piésold consulting firm) are solely aimed at presenting⁤ the ⁣projects as financeable, rather than conducting ​scientific verification and evaluation.

The‌ ELARD/TRC assessment‍ has ​serious‍ implications for investors/lenders. It may involve⁤ corporate‍ and investment fraud, deliberate ⁣misleading of investors/lenders, deliberate concealment of‌ the real risks and therefore​ the real costs of a mining ⁤project. In just one of the many passages in this assessment, for example, the assessors note that ⁢the mine⁣ closure ‌duration and costs have⁣ been reduced from the standard ​30 years to the current 5 years, thus reducing mine⁣ closure costs by more than half.

We understand that as business and⁤ financial entities, you are interested ‍in​ making a​ profit,⁢ but the ⁣purpose of this letter is to inform you of the​ fraudulent activities ‍of ‍your client corporation, and to warn ‌you that you too share the potential consequences.

We ​urge you‍ to withdraw your investment/funding ‌from the Amulsar gold mine project of​ Lydian company.”

Interview Between Time.news Editor and Environmental Expert on the Amulsar Mining Project

Time.news⁢ Editor (TNE): Welcome to our special‍ interview segment. Today, we’re diving ⁢deep into the controversial Amulsar mining project in ​Armenia,⁢ which ⁢has generated significant concern among local ‌residents and environmentalists alike. I’m joined ‌by Dr. Amelia Harutyunyan,​ an environmental scientist‌ and activist who has been closely monitoring⁣ this situation. Thank you for joining ⁤us, Dr. Harutyunyan.

Dr. Amelia Harutyunyan (AH): Thank you for having me.‍ It’s crucial to talk about what’s ​happening in Armenia, especially regarding the Amulsar project.

TNE: Let’s start‍ with the basics. Lydian Company has been pushing forward with​ its plans⁤ for the Amulsar gold mine.‍ However,⁤ there ​is a strong ​opposition from local citizens. Can you explain the main concerns that‌ these communities have?

AH: Certainly. The primary concerns revolve around health risks and⁣ the potential environmental damage that the⁤ mining operations​ could cause. Local residents have​ consistently voiced their fear‌ that the mining ‍will contaminate nearby water sources, including those used for medicinal purposes in Jermuk. ⁤With Amulsar‌ being in a crucial ecological area—close⁣ to⁢ Lake Sevan—there is a legitimate concern about the ‌long-term⁢ impacts⁤ on​ this vital water body as well.

TNE: ⁤ It seems there hasn’t been sufficient consideration of local voices in this process. What has ‌been the response from these ⁢communities?

AH: The residents ​of communities ‍like Jermuk and Gndevaz ​have been remarkably‌ organized. Since ‌June 2018, after the revitalization of democratic sentiment in Armenia, locals have taken action by blocking access ​to ‍the mine and issuing petitions against the project. They‍ feel their‍ land and health are at stake, ‍and they’re advocating for their rights to⁤ be⁢ heard.

TNE: That’s powerful. The​ article mentions the findings⁢ of an ‌independent ​assessment by ELARD and TRC. What were the implications of their report?

AH: Their findings were quite alarming. The ⁣assessment pointed out that the⁣ original⁣ Environmental⁤ Impact⁣ Assessments (EIA) conducted by Lydian were riddled with omissions and inaccuracies, leading​ to a ​characterization of the reports‌ as “unscientific.” The experts concluded⁢ that open-pit mining in such a sensitive area ⁤as Amulsar ‌is potentially unsafe, emphasizing that the previous assessments failed to consider the unique geographical and environmental context of⁣ the site.

TNE: Such findings raise serious questions about ⁣the entire project’s credibility. How do financial institutions factor into this situation?

AH: Financial institutions⁣ like the International Finance Corporation and the European Bank for Reconstruction and‌ Development have been heavily scrutinized. While⁢ the IFC rolled back‌ its⁣ support in 2017 after acknowledging non-compliance with​ its standards,⁣ the EBRD has yet to address the community’s complaints effectively. This inconsistency raises ethical concerns about how these institutions are ‍supporting projects that significantly⁣ impact ⁣local populations.

TNE: What is the next step for activists and the local community in ⁣their ‍struggle against the mining ⁤project?

AH: ⁣Activists⁢ are focusing on raising awareness and continuing ⁤to build community‍ consensus against the mine. Legal avenues are still open, with several ongoing​ lawsuits ‍targeting the project ‌based on environmental and health concerns. The goal is to document every violation and make sure the‍ voices of the citizens are amplified until the ⁤necessary changes are ‌made.

TNE: ⁤ Thank ⁢you, Dr. Harutyunyan, for sharing your insights. It’s ⁢crucial ​for⁤ our audiences to understand the‍ gravity of the situation in Amulsar. Any final thoughts for our readers?

AH: I urge everyone to stay informed⁣ and support ⁤local communities in their fight for environmental ‌justice. This‌ isn’t ⁤just an Armenian issue; it’s a global​ concern. Responsible investment decisions are vital, and those who fund these projects must prioritize the rights and⁣ wellbeing of affected⁢ communities.

TNE: Thank you for your ‍perspective, Dr. Harutyunyan, and for your dedication to this important⁤ issue. We’ll continue‍ to follow this⁣ story closely ⁣and keep our audience updated. ‌

AH: Thank you for your coverage. Together, we can shine a ​light ‍on​ these critical issues.

You may also like

Leave a Comment