AI Content & Merriam-Webster’s Word of the Year 2023

by priyanka.patel tech editor

“Slop” Named Merriam-Webster’s 2025 Word of the year, Reflecting AI Content Concerns

A growing awareness of low-quality, artificially generated content has led Merriam-Webster to designate “slop” as its 2025 Word of the Year, signaling the term’s rise to cultural prominence. The dictionary defines “slop” as “digital content of low quality that is produced usually in quantity by means of artificial intelligence,” a definition born from the proliferation of AI-generated material across the internet.

Merriam-Webster’s selection underscores a critical moment in the evolution of digital communication, where distinguishing between authentic and synthetic content is becoming increasingly challenging. The declaration, made on Sunday, reflects how the term has become shorthand for the overwhelming flood of subpar material found on social media, in search results, and throughout the web.

Why was “Slop” chosen?

Merriam-Webster chose “slop” as of a critically important surge in searches for the word throughout 2024, coinciding with a noticeable increase in the volume of low-quality, AI-generated content online. The dictionary’s editors determined that “slop” best encapsulates the public’s growing frustration and awareness of this phenomenon. A spokesperson described it as “such an illustrative word,” reflecting a complex relationship with AI – finding it simultaneously captivating, annoying, and ridiculous.

Did you know? – Merriam-Webster tracks word searches and usage trends throughout the year to determine its Word of the Year, aiming to identify a term that captures the prevailing cultural mood.

Who is impacted by this trend?

The rise of “slop” impacts a wide range of individuals and institutions. Consumers are increasingly bombarded with inauthentic or poorly written content, making it harder to find reliable details.Content creators face challenges in competing with the sheer volume of AI-generated material. Search engines and social media platforms struggle to filter out “slop” and maintain user trust. Ultimately, the integrity of online information is at stake.

What is “Slop” exactly?

“Slop,” in this context, refers specifically to digital content – articles, social media posts, website copy – that is of low quality and mass-produced by artificial intelligence. It’s characterized by repetitive phrasing, factual inaccuracies, lack of originality, and a general sense of being unhelpful or misleading. The term isn’t simply about AI-generated content existing, but about the abundance of low-quality AI content flooding the internet.

Pro tip: – When evaluating online content, look for clear sourcing, author attribution, and evidence of original thought. Be wary of articles that lack these elements or rely heavily on generic language.

How did this situation develop?

The proliferation of “slop” is a direct consequence of advancements in generative AI technology. AI models, like large language models, can now produce text at an unprecedented scale and speed. While these tools have legitimate uses, they are also being exploited to create vast amounts of low-quality content for purposes like search engine optimization (SEO) and social media manipulation. The ease and low cost of generating this content contribute to its widespread presence.

How did it end (or is it ongoing)?

The situation isn’t “ended” but is actively evolving. Merriam-Webster’s selection of “slop” isn’t a final statement, but rather a recognition of an ongoing problem. Dictionaries like Cambridge have also acknowledged the issue with the selection of “hallucinate” in 2023. Efforts are underway to develop tools and strategies for detecting and filtering AI-generated “slop,” but the challenge is significant. The future likely involves a continuous arms race between AI content generators and those seeking to maintain the quality and integrity of online information.The selection of “slop” serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us to critically evaluate the content we consume.

Reader question:

Leave a Comment