Apple finds itself in a curious position. While the tech giant hasn’t yet released a fully-fledged, proprietary artificial intelligence model to rival those of Google or OpenAI, it’s already reaping significant financial benefits from the AI boom – not through its own innovation, but through the success of others’ apps on its App Store. This dynamic, dubbed “La paradoja de Apple” – the Apple paradox – highlights a strategic reliance on competitors while simultaneously navigating the challenges of developing its own AI capabilities.
The numbers are striking. Analysis firm AppMagic projects that AI-powered applications will generate nearly $900 million in commission revenue for Apple in 2025. This figure is particularly noteworthy given Apple’s comparatively slow progress in the AI space, and its reliance on third-party developers to fill the gap. The company’s longstanding control over the iOS ecosystem, and the 15-30% commission it takes on App Store transactions, is proving to be a lucrative position as AI adoption surges among iPhone users.
The revenue stream is largely driven by the popularity of AI chatbots and tools. Three-quarters of Apple’s AI-related App Store income comes from ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, while Grok, from xAI, accounts for approximately 5%. The growth has been rapid: revenue from AI apps on the App Store jumped from around $35 million in January 2025 to $101 million in August, before dipping slightly towards the complete of the year as ChatGPT downloads cooled.
A Commission-Based Strategy
Apple’s cut from AI apps isn’t insignificant, but as the Wall Street Journal notes, $1 billion represents a relatively minor portion of Apple’s overall revenue. However, it’s a positive signal for the company’s services segment, which investors are closely watching for continued growth and high profit margins. The standard commission structure sees developers ceding 30% of transaction fees to Apple during the first year of a subscription, falling to 15% in subsequent years, though rates can vary by country.
Developers aren’t without options. They can attempt to bypass Apple’s commission by directing users to external payment gateways. However, as the WSJ found in testing, ChatGPT currently doesn’t offer any discounts for users who subscribe through its website, effectively making the App Store the more attractive option for many.
Differentiating Through On-Device AI
Apple is pursuing a distinct AI strategy, one that prioritizes on-device processing over massive cloud infrastructure. Rather than investing heavily in data centers and specialized chips, Apple is leveraging the processing power of its own silicon and the personal data already stored on iPhones to run AI models directly on the device. This approach, some researchers suggest, could be advantageous if privacy concerns become a primary driver of AI adoption.
Charles Rinehart, director of investments at Johnson Asset Management, emphasized the importance of Apple demonstrating the effectiveness of this strategy. “If Apple acts as an intermediary, collecting commissions from AI companies, it could gain a long-term advantage by avoiding the high investment costs,” he told the Wall Street Journal. Unlike competitors like Google and Amazon, Apple doesn’t have a cloud computing business to offset the costs of large-scale AI infrastructure.
Siri’s Struggles and the Competition
Despite the financial benefits from third-party AI apps, Apple’s own AI assistant, Siri, remains a weak point. It currently relies on outdated technology, capable of basic tasks like setting alarms but lacking the conversational memory and advanced capabilities of ChatGPT and other modern chatbots. Apple is working to address this, announcing in January a partnership with Google to integrate Google’s Gemini technology into the next version of Siri. Some features of Apple Intelligence are already powered by ChatGPT.
Meanwhile, competitors are pushing forward. OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, is reportedly investing in hardware development, having acquired a hardware startup co-founded by Jony Ive, Apple’s former chief design officer. Several former Apple employees have also joined the project. Even Elon Musk has signaled potential interest in entering the smartphone market, though he clarified on X that he is “not building a phone.”
Google, with its Android operating system, already offers a range of AI-powered features on its Pixel smartphones that are generally considered more advanced than Apple’s offerings. However, this hasn’t yet translated into a mass exodus of iPhone users. OpenAI is also attempting to build its own app ecosystem within ChatGPT, but these applications have yet to consistently outperform native smartphone apps.
Looking Ahead
Apple’s strategy appears to be a calculated bet on leveraging its existing ecosystem and hardware capabilities while navigating the rapidly evolving AI landscape. The company’s success will likely hinge on its ability to deliver compelling on-device AI experiences and to close the gap with competitors in areas like conversational AI. The next major checkpoint will be the release of iOS 18 and the full rollout of Apple Intelligence later this year, providing a clearer picture of Apple’s long-term vision for AI.
What are your thoughts on Apple’s approach to AI? Share your opinions in the comments below and feel free to share this article with your network.
