Barnier government overthrown: which deputies voted in favor of censorship?

The “moment ⁢of truth” awaited by michel‌ Barnier‍ ended this⁢ Wednesday, December 4, at 8.26 pm, with an ax-shaped figure for the Prime Minister. ⁢331⁣ deputies voted in⁣ favor of the‍ motion of no confidence presented by the left, announced the president of⁤ the National Assembly Yaël⁤ Braun-Pivet.

This is a figure ​substantially higher ‍than the ⁢288‍ votes ⁣needed to adopt the motion or the absolute majority‍ of the current 574 seats in the National ⁣Assembly (taking into ⁣account the⁤ three seats ‌left vacant following the resignations of⁣ the deputies).

VideoMEPs approve the motion⁤ of censure

At 8.27pm, michel Barnier then⁤ left ​the chamber at a brisk pace amidst the applause of the deputies of his common base and the applause⁤ of the left.

Only the deputies in ⁢favor‍ of‍ the motion were called ‌to participate,using ⁤barcoded‍ cards,in the vote organized for 45 minutes in the ‌rooms⁤ adjacent to the chamber,after‌ more than⁢ two and a ⁣half hours of heated debate.

It is not surprising ‍that​ the 193‍ deputies of⁣ the four groups of the New⁤ Popular Front voted almost unanimously​ in favor​ of the motion ‌defended by LFI deputy ⁤and president of the⁢ Finance Commission Éric Coquerel.Not a single vote ​was‌ missing from the LFI (71 deputies)‍ and from the⁢ ecological ⁤and social group (38).

In⁣ the PS‍ (66 deputies), only Sophie ‌Pantel,⁢ deputy ​from lozère,‍ is missing, who ⁤had already ⁤announced that she will not vote in favor of⁣ censorship. Like⁣ the New Caledonian ‌MP Emmanuel Tjibaou in the ‍Democratic and Republican⁤ Left ‌group (17 deputies).

on the other side of the chamber, the deputies ​of the National rally and of the ‌Ciottist ‍right of the UDR also voted with an overwhelming majority in favor of ​the text (139 out of 140).An RN⁤ MP did not do ‍so, with no clarification​ at this⁢ stage.

Despite ⁤the pressure exerted ⁢on⁤ the Lepenist troops in the previous hours, their hand did not tremble. “There ⁢was never any hesitation,” says Franck Allisio,RN⁣ MP for the Bouches-du-Rhone. twice this week,marine Le ⁣Pen asked us if any parliamentarians had doubts,but ⁢everyone was ‍in unison. »

Elsewhere, Guadeloupe MP⁢ Olivier Serva is the only ‍member of his centrist Liot group to have voted for​ censorship.​ Among the ⁣voters there ⁢is also the unregistered ⁣Daniel⁤ Grenon.

Until the end, Michel ⁣Barnier called on ⁣the⁤ elected representatives of the left and the RN to be “responsible”, asking them not to join⁣ forces to overthrow​ him in the name of the ⁢uncertainties that this would⁤ cause for ⁣the country. ​“Measure the consequences ‌of this vote. Pierre mendès france⁣ said to never sacrifice ⁢the future​ for the present. I advise you to⁢ keep this phrase in mind when voting,” he insisted in an empty voice.

Before him, the⁣ leader of the ‍deputies⁣ of the LR group⁣ Laurent Wauquiez and his Macron counterpart Gabriel Attal had afterward ‌called ⁤on the RN and the left to “act together”. In vain. A ⁢few⁣ minutes⁢ earlier, the leader of the‌ socialist deputies Boris Vallaud had ‍summed up the​ situation⁤ with⁤ a formula: “The power is no longer ⁤in the Elysée, the power is ‌no longer in Matignon, the power⁣ is here, in ​the National Assembly”. .

‍How might the political dynamics ⁢in​ France change following the vote of no confidence?

Interview: The Political Landscape Post-Vote of No ⁤Confidence

Interviewer (Time.news Editor): Good afternoon,and thank you ‌for joining us today! We’re here with Dr. Elise Moreau, a political ​analyst and expert in governmental processes. ‍Dr. Moreau, the recent ‍vote of no confidence against Prime ⁤Minister ‍Michel Barnier has left⁢ many in shock. Can you start by describing the significance of this moment?

Dr. elise Moreau: Absolutely, and thank you for⁤ having me. This moment is pivotal not just for Barnier⁤ but‌ for the entire political landscape in France. The fact that ‍331⁤ deputies voted in favor of the motion, far exceeding the 288 required, indicates a⁤ strong dissatisfaction ⁤with the current government. It ‌reflects a significant shift in the National Assembly’s dynamics and raises questions ‍about ⁣Barnier’s ‌ability to govern moving forward.

Interviewer: That’s a striking number. With 574 seats in the National Assembly, how do you interpret ‌the support ‍behind this motion?

Dr. Elise Moreau: ⁣ Well,‌ the overwhelming support of the‍ left suggests a united front against Barnier’s‍ policies and ⁤leadership style. It’s noteworthy that this motion passed ⁣despite the current configuration of the Assembly, which is still affected ⁢by the recent resignations. This indicates a powerful coalition⁢ among opposition members, signaling that they believe strong action is necesary ⁣to instigate change.

Interviewer: What do you think were the key factors that led to this vote of no confidence? Were there specific policies or events that pushed the left to⁢ take this drastic⁣ measure?

Dr. Elise Moreau: Certainly. There were growing public discontent and protest ‍movements against Barnier’s ‌recent policies, especially in areas such as healthcare and economic reform. The opposition capitalized on these sentiments, aligning them with broader calls for accountability and transparency. This vote was not just​ about a single issue; it was⁣ a culmination of various grievances that have built ​up over ⁢time.

Interviewer: How does this vote​ impact Barnier’s future as ‌Prime ⁤Minister? ​What are the possible scenarios we ⁢might see unfold in the coming weeks?

Dr.Elise moreau: ⁢The situation is precarious for Barnier. He has limited options; he could choose to step ⁤down, which‌ would trigger a new leadership battle within his party, or he may attempt to ⁤rally support to counteract this motion by re-evaluating his policies. However,‍ the credibility and political capital needed to regain lost trust will be hard to come by. His government faces the threat of instability, and there’s a ‌strong possibility that the left could push for early elections ⁢if they believe they can⁣ capitalize ⁣on⁢ this momentum.

Interviewer: Given this context, how do ⁢you envision the⁤ role of the National​ Assembly in shaping the next ⁤steps?⁤ What should we watch for in the ensuing debates and discussions?

Dr. Elise Moreau: The National Assembly will play a‌ crucial role in the coming weeks.We should closely monitor the emerging alliances among parties,as the power dynamics will shift in⁤ response to Barnier’s strategies. Upcoming debates will likely focus not only on the immediate outcome of this vote but also on broader legislative⁣ agendas, including potential reforms or new proposals ⁢from the opposition. Ultimately, this could lead to either ⁢a more collaborative surroundings or an ⁣escalation of tensions, depending on how both sides navigate ⁣this moment.

Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Moreau, for your insight.It’s clear that ‍the political landscape in​ France is poised for significant change. We ‌appreciate your time and expertise‍ on this developing situation.

Dr. Elise Moreau: Thank you for having me! It will be captivating to see how this all unfolds.

You may also like

Leave a Comment