Across the European Union, over 1.2 million people gained citizenship in 2024, an 11.6% increase from the previous year, according to data released by Eurostat on March 27th. While Germany, Spain, and Italy granted the most new citizenships, a significant disparity exists in how readily EU member states integrate long-term residents. The Baltic states – Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia – consistently record the lowest naturalisation rates in the bloc, raising questions about integration policies and their impact on residents who have built lives within these nations.
The overall rise in citizenship grants reflects broader demographic shifts and evolving immigration patterns across Europe. In total, 762,100 citizenships were conferred in 2014, compared to the 1.2 million in 2024, representing a 54.5% jump. The vast majority – 88% – of those newly naturalised came from countries outside the EU, while just over 10% were citizens of other EU member states seeking to formalise their residency. This influx highlights the EU’s continued appeal as a destination for individuals seeking new opportunities and a stable future.
Baltic States Lag Behind in Naturalisation
Despite the overall increase in EU-wide naturalisation, the Baltic states stand out for their comparatively low rates. Eurostat data reveals that Lithuania had the lowest rate, with only 0.1 citizenships granted per 100 non-national residents in 2024. Estonia and Bulgaria followed closely behind at 0.3, while Latvia recorded a rate of 0.4. These figures contrast sharply with Sweden, which led the EU with a rate of 7.5, followed by Italy (4.1) and Spain and the Netherlands (both at 3.9). Eurostat defines the naturalisation rate as the number of citizenships acquired in a year relative to the total number of non-national residents at the start of that year.
The reasons behind these low rates are complex and rooted in the historical and political contexts of the Baltic states. Following their independence from the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, these countries adopted citizenship laws that often prioritized ethnic or linguistic ties to the pre-Soviet population. This resulted in a significant population of “non-citizens” – individuals who had resided in the countries for years, sometimes decades, but did not meet the criteria for automatic citizenship.
In Latvia, for example, Eurostat data indicates that most of those who gained citizenship in 2024 were formerly classified as ‘non-citizens.’ This suggests a gradual shift in policy, but the process remains slow and often requires applicants to pass language and knowledge tests, demonstrate financial stability, and renounce their previous citizenship – a requirement that some countries do not impose.
The Impact of Citizenship Status
The lack of citizenship can have significant consequences for long-term residents in the Baltic states. Non-citizens often face restrictions on employment, property ownership, and political participation. They may also experience difficulties traveling within the EU and accessing certain social services. This creates a two-tiered system where individuals who have contributed to the economy and society for years are denied full rights, and opportunities.
The issue is particularly sensitive in Latvia and Estonia, which have substantial Russian-speaking minority populations. Many individuals in these communities do not meet the language requirements for naturalisation, and some are reluctant to renounce their Russian citizenship. This has led to accusations of discrimination and a lack of integration efforts. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty reported in 2024 on ongoing debates surrounding language requirements for naturalisation in Latvia, highlighting the challenges faced by Russian-speaking residents.
Differing Approaches to Integration Across the EU
The contrast between the Baltic states and countries like Sweden, Italy, and Spain underscores the diverse approaches to integration within the EU. Sweden, for example, has a long-standing tradition of welcoming immigrants and offers relatively straightforward pathways to citizenship. Italy and Spain have also streamlined their naturalisation processes in recent years, recognising the economic and social benefits of integrating long-term residents.
The differing approaches reflect varying national priorities and political considerations. Some countries prioritize cultural assimilation, while others emphasize economic contribution and social inclusion. There is no single “right” way to approach naturalisation, but the Baltic states’ low rates raise concerns about their commitment to fostering a more inclusive and integrated society.
The European Commission has repeatedly called on member states to facilitate naturalisation for legal residents who meet certain criteria, arguing that it promotes social cohesion and economic growth. However, the decision on citizenship policies ultimately rests with each individual country.
Looking ahead, the Baltic states face increasing pressure to address the issue of non-citizenship. The ongoing war in Ukraine has highlighted the importance of solidarity and inclusivity, and the need to provide a clear path to citizenship for those who have sought refuge in the region. The next key development will be the review of citizenship laws in Latvia, scheduled for debate in parliament later this year, which could potentially ease restrictions and accelerate the naturalisation process.
This evolving landscape underscores the ongoing debate surrounding citizenship and integration within the EU. As demographic shifts continue and migration patterns change, finding a balance between national sovereignty and the rights of long-term residents will remain a critical challenge for policymakers across the continent.
What are your thoughts on the differing naturalisation rates across the EU? Share your perspective in the comments below, and please share this article with your network.
