Toronto city councillors are preparing for a legal battle with the provincial government over Premier Doug Ford’s plan to seize control of the city’s stake in Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport. The move, announced this week, has ignited a fierce debate about municipal autonomy and the future of the waterfront, prompting councillors to formally request legal options to defend city-owned land and advocate for a greater voice in decisions impacting Toronto’s development.
The core of the dispute lies in the province’s intention to designate Billy Bishop Airport as a “special economic zone,” a move that would allow the government to bypass municipal and provincial regulations as it pursues an expansion project that includes accommodating jet aircraft. This designation, enabled by Bill 5, has raised concerns among councillors and residents about potential noise pollution, environmental impacts and the disruption of planned waterfront development projects. The city currently holds approximately 20 per cent ownership of the airport land, alongside the federal government and the Toronto Port Authority.
On Wednesday, councillors unanimously voted to oppose any unilateral expropriation of city land by either the provincial or federal governments. The motion, introduced by Councillor Ausma Malik, also calls on both Queen’s Park and Ottawa to include the city council and Toronto residents in all significant decisions concerning the utilize of the waterfront. “The province is telling us they don’t care what we have to say, they don’t care about collaboration, negotiation or the best outcomes, they don’t care what Torontonians have to say,” Malik stated, emphasizing the council’s demand for a seat at the table.
The city solicitor is now tasked with reporting back to council by April 22-24 with a comprehensive assessment of potential legal avenues to protect Toronto’s interests. Councillor Josh Matlow, who successfully amended the motion to include the legal review, questioned the implications of inaction. “If we don’t take a stand and look into every option that we have, what’s going to be the next announcement?” he asked his colleagues.
Ford’s Plan and the Use of Special Designation
Premier Ford has publicly stated his desire to modernize and expand Billy Bishop Airport, arguing that it will create jobs, stimulate the provincial economy, and alleviate congestion at Toronto Pearson International Airport. He has framed the opposition from some city councillors as resistance to progress. “These lefties don’t seek to modernize or grow the airport,” Ford said Monday, according to reporting by CBC News. The province intends to utilize the special economic zone designation to expedite the expansion process, potentially overriding existing municipal and provincial laws through the use of Bill 5.
Bill 5, officially known as the Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2023, allows the province to establish special economic zones with streamlined regulatory processes. Critics argue that the bill grants the provincial government excessive power and undermines local decision-making. The use of this legislation at Billy Bishop Airport marks the first time it has been invoked since its passage.
Legal Challenges and City’s Limited Options
Despite the council’s resolve to fight the takeover, legal experts suggest the city’s options may be limited. As reported by CBC Toronto earlier this month, the province ultimately holds jurisdiction over the airport. If the city formally objects, the province could potentially utilize its expropriation powers within six months, with the courts determining the amount of compensation owed to the city for its land.
According to David Potts, a former president of the Ontario Expropriation Association, the province has significant legal authority in this situation. “The province has the power to take the land,” Potts told CBC Toronto. “The question is what the city will gain for it.” This potential outcome underscores the challenging legal landscape facing the city as it prepares its defense.
Broader Concerns: Waterfront Development and Local Autonomy
The dispute extends beyond the immediate issue of airport expansion. Several councillors have voiced concerns about the potential impact on ongoing waterfront development projects, particularly in the Port Lands. Councillor Dianne Saxe expressed fears that runway expansion could jeopardize plans for thousands of new housing units. “And that’s going to be ruined by making runway space for these jets that don’t belong there? It’s a terrible idea,” she said before Wednesday’s council meeting.
The debate also touches on a fundamental question of municipal autonomy. Councillor Gord Perks framed the issue as a broader challenge to local governance. “It’s about whether you believe that local governments have a say in local decision-making,” he stated. The province’s actions have fueled concerns that Queen’s Park is increasingly willing to bypass local authorities in pursuit of its own priorities.
What’s Next?
The city solicitor’s report, due to be presented to council on April 22-24, will be a crucial step in determining the city’s legal strategy. The report will outline potential options for defending the city’s interests, including potential legal challenges to the province’s actions. In the meantime, councillors are continuing to advocate for a collaborative approach, urging the province to engage in meaningful consultation with the city and its residents.
The coming weeks will be critical as Toronto navigates this complex legal and political challenge. The outcome will not only determine the future of Billy Bishop Airport but also set a precedent for the relationship between the provincial government and its municipalities. The situation highlights the ongoing tension between provincial authority and local control, a dynamic that will continue to shape Ontario’s urban landscape.
Disclaimer: This article provides information about a developing legal and political situation. It is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should consult with qualified legal professionals for advice specific to their circumstances.
What are your thoughts on the province’s plan for Billy Bishop Airport? Share your comments below and join the conversation.
