Istanbul Convention: Jurēvics Demands Security Review Before Denunciation

Latvian Parliament Advances Contentious Legislation Amidst Istanbul Convention Debate

A recent parliamentary vote in Latvia has accelerated the legislative process for a new law,while simultaneously igniting debate surrounding the nation’s commitment to the Istanbul Convention,a landmark treaty aimed at combating violence against women. The move to grant the legislation “urgency” – limiting it to two readings – has raised concerns about thorough scrutiny, even as lawmakers consider an choice declaration.

The expedited process means the law will proceed thru the Saeima, Latvia’s parliament, with limited debate. If adopted in two readings with the support of at least two-thirds of the deputies, the President’s veto power would be bypassed, ensuring swift promulgation.

Did you know? – The Istanbul Convention is a Council of Europe treaty requiring extensive policies to protect women and men from violence. Latvia ratified it in 2016, but its implementation has faced political hurdles.

Parliamentary Divisions Emerge

On Thursday, a total of 52 members of parliament, representing opposition parties and the ZZS coalition, voted in favor of granting the legislation urgency. However, 31 MPs from the “Progresīvo” and JV factions opposed the measure, and one ZZS MP, Andris Bērziņš, abstained – marking him as the sole representative of his party to not support the expedited process.This breakdown resulted in less than the required two-thirds majority of those present voting for urgency.

Simultaneously, a majority of Saeima deputies have voiced support for a declaration crafted by NA, ZZS, and AS parties, presented as an “alternative to the Istanbul Convention.” This declaration has drawn sharp criticism from opposing factions.

Reader question: – What specific aspects of the Istanbul Convention are most vital to protect women and men from violence? What are the key differences between the convention and the proposed alternative declaration?

Critics Question “Alternative” Declaration

“Progressives” and JV have accused parties advocating for the declaration of attempting to “wash themselves” of responsibility, arguing it creates a false impression of equivalence to the comprehensive protections offered by the Istanbul Convention. According to a representative from the “Marta” Center, beata Jonīte, a local political statement simply cannot replicate the convention’s impact. “It dose not provide for obligations and control mechanisms for the state,” she stated.

The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence – commonly known as the Istanbul Convention – entered into force in Latvia on May 1 of last year. The treaty mandates that member states develop comprehensive policies to protect women and men from all forms of violence, including the provision of vital support services. These include crisis centers, 24-hour crisis telephone lines, and specialized support centers for victims of sexual violence, and also protections for children who witness violence.

The current debate underscores the complex political landscape surrounding women’s rights and international agreements in Latvia, raising questions about the future of comprehensive violence prevention measures.

Pro tip: – The Istanbul Convention requires member states to establish support services like crisis centers and hotlines. These services are crucial for victims of violence.