America’s most prestigious universities, long enthusiastic investors in private equity, are beginning to reassess that strategy. While overall endowment returns have been bolstered by strong market performance, the returns from private equity investments continue to lag, creating a growing concern among Ivy League financial officers. This shift comes as the sector faces increased scrutiny and a more crowded investment landscape.
The trend, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, highlights a broader challenge for institutional investors: the difficulty of consistently generating high returns in the increasingly competitive world of private equity. For decades, these universities viewed private equity as a key component of their portfolios, offering the potential for outsized gains. But, recent performance suggests that those gains are becoming harder to achieve.
Ivy League Returns Rise, But Private Equity Remains a Drag
Strong market conditions have generally benefited Ivy League endowments in the recent fiscal year. As of October 27, 2025, MIT led the pack with a net return of 14.8 percent, followed closely by Stanford at 14.3 percent, according to data compiled by Institutional Investor. Columbia University reported a 12.4 percent return, an improvement over the 11.5 percent seen in the previous fiscal year. The University of Pennsylvania achieved a 12.2 percent return, with Brown, Harvard, and Yale following closely behind at 11.9 percent, 11.9 percent, and 11.1 percent, respectively. Princeton and Dartmouth reported returns of 11 percent and 10.8 percent. Cornell University had not yet released its figures as of October 27.
Despite these positive results, Kim Lew, president and CEO of Columbia Investment Management Co., noted that “private investments saw a significant improvement versus the last few years… performance still lags public market performance.” This sentiment is echoed across many of the Ivy League institutions, signaling a growing disconnect between the promise and the reality of private equity investments.
A Perfect Storm of Challenges
Several factors are contributing to this shift in perspective. Brad Conger, chief investment officer for Hirtle Callaghan, described the current situation as a “perfect storm of pinched operations and slower returns of capital than we thought.” The challenges include a more crowded private equity market, making it harder to find attractive investment opportunities, and longer-than-expected holding periods for illiquid assets.
Adding to the pressure is a new endowment tax impacting several Ivy League institutions. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Stanford are now taxed at 8 percent, while Penn and Dartmouth face a 4 percent rate. Other endowments are expected to remain at the current 1.4 percent rate. This increased tax burden further incentivizes universities to seek investments that generate quicker and more reliable returns.
The Appeal and the Reality of Private Equity
For years, private equity offered the allure of higher returns compared to traditional investments like stocks and bonds. Universities, with their long-term investment horizons, were well-positioned to take advantage of the illiquidity premium associated with these investments. However, the increasing size of Ivy League endowments—often exceeding $30 billion—means they need to deploy significant capital, making it more demanding to find enough high-quality private equity deals to maintain their desired allocation.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the crowded field and subpar returns have frustrated America’s wealthiest universities, some of private-capital firms’ most longstanding investors. This has led to questions about whether the benefits of private equity still outweigh the costs, particularly in light of the increased tax burden and the availability of more attractive opportunities in public markets.
What’s Next for Ivy League Investments?
The future of Ivy League investments in private equity remains uncertain. Universities are likely to develop into more selective in their private equity commitments, focusing on top-tier firms and strategies with a proven track record. Some may also consider reducing their overall allocation to private equity in favor of more liquid assets. The situation is evolving, and the coming years will reveal how these institutions adapt to the changing investment landscape.
The next key date to watch is the release of Cornell University’s endowment returns, which will provide a complete picture of Ivy League performance for the fiscal year. Further insights will also emerge as universities report their investment strategies and allocations in the coming months.
Disclaimer: This article provides information for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and does not constitute financial advice.
What do you think about the Ivy League’s reassessment of private equity? Share your thoughts in the comments below and share this article with your network.
