2024-05-23 16:49:40
The Legislative Administration Council (CAL) resolved this Could 17, 2024 to make a name of consideration to the president of the Oversight Fee, Pamela Aguirre, and never sanction it. Legislators from different events questioned that call.
The CAL addressed the problem in level 2 of this morning’s session. The decision raised by the Correísta meeting member Esther Cuesta to not qualify the criticism towards Aguirre, introduced by the meeting member of Gente Buena, Gisella Molina.
Molina sought to sanction Aguirre, of the Citizen Revolution, as a result of he gave solution to receiving generally fee Ronny Aleaga within the session by which the prosecutor appeared Diana Salazar, on Could 13. In his criticism, Molina argued an alleged misuse of the amenities of the Nationwide Meeting. However the CAL determined solely to name consideration to Aguirre.
Otto Veraof the Social Christian Occasion, in his private capability, stated earlier than studying of the decision that Aguirre’s actions have been unsuitable and that due course of was violated, so a sanction. This measure entails a suspension of features.
The CAL additionally resolved counsel to the Plenary of the Meeting the creation of an occasional specialised fee multipartidista to course of payments despatched by the Government.
On Could 16, assumptions have been aired about an settlement in order that Aguirre wouldn’t be sanctioned and the formation of the multiparty fee can be supported.
Fabiola Santamaríaof Pachakutik (PK), believes that was concretized settlement. “Apparently sure, as a result of this exhibits that the inspection course of carried out within the completely different commissions isn’t adequately managed, particularly on this one (Oversight) accountable for coping with delicate issues for the nation. There needed to be a sanction Let it serve for instance for different meeting members who wish to violate the norm,” he criticized.
He hopes {that a} PK consultant can be part of the multiparty fee, whether it is permitted within the Plenary Meeting.
Within the absence of a suspension within the political area, the matter should be moved to the sector penalin accordance with Paul Buestan, from Construye. He famous that the Prosecutor’s Workplace ought to name render model to Aguirre and the secretary of the legislative board. “That they had contact with the fugitive from justice, they need to point out what that contact was like and what the technique of communication have been for him (Aleaga) to attach through telematics,” he criticized. He said that he’s unaware of the alleged settlement, however that Aguirre deserved to be sanctioned.
“Es wild that the CAL has solely attracted consideration,” rejected assemblyman César Umajinga, from the ruling get together. He notes that the advice to create the multi-party fee would reply to a calculation in order to not break order and keep away from the destabilization of the Nationwide Meeting. However there are underlying points, what Aguirre did “isn’t forgiven”, he emphasised.
Adriana Garciafrom the identical block, stated that not sanctioning Aguirre exhibits the “previous politics” and that it might reply to an settlement.
Ricardo Ulcuango, from the Citizen Revolution, defended his fellow member by mentioning that he didn’t commit none violation of parliamentary norms.
Fuente: www.kchcomunicacion.com