The European Union’s pursuit of strategic autonomy is facing a reckoning in the Caucasus, where the gap between political ambition and material reality has become impossible to ignore. As the European Political Community (EPC) convened in Yerevan on May 4, the summit served as a stark reminder that European strategic autonomy and critical raw materials are inextricably linked; without the latter, the former remains a diplomatic aspiration rather than a geopolitical fact.
The choice of Armenia as the venue was deeply symbolic. Yerevan sits at the heart of the Caucasus Corridor, a vital geographic alternative to Russian-controlled northern routes and Middle Eastern southern paths for energy flows. For Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, the summit marked a definitive pivot. In a moment of historic clarity, Pashinyan admitted that Nagorno-Karabakh was never truly Armenian, a concession that effectively ends a territorial dispute with Azerbaijan spanning three wars and signals Armenia’s decisive shift away from Moscow’s orbit toward Europe.
This realignment is not merely symbolic; it is transactional. In a bilateral agreement signed shortly after the summit, the EU is drawing Armenia into its security sphere with promises of defense investments and enhanced connectivity. In exchange, Armenia has committed to blocking the evasion of sanctions on dual-use goods—microchips, semiconductors, and precision optics—that Russia relies upon to sustain its drone and missile production. For a nation still technically tied to Moscow’s military alliance, this move suggests a growing conviction among Putin’s allies that the “Tsar” is no longer a reliable guarantor of security.
The Missile Gap and the Illusion of Defense Autonomy
While the diplomatic gains in Armenia are significant, the EU’s military vulnerabilities remain acute. The fragility of European security was laid bare by the United States’ decision to cancel the deployment of Tomahawk missiles in Germany, a commitment previously made by Joe Biden during the 2024 NATO summit. These long-range assets were intended to counter Russian Iskander missiles stationed in Kaliningrad and fill a critical capability void.
The current European arsenal—comprising the Scalp, Storm Shadow, and Taurus systems—is limited by a range of 300 to 500 kilometers. In contrast, the Tomahawk offers a reach of 1,600 kilometers. This disparity creates a dangerous dependency. Friedrich Merz noted that the U.S. Itself currently faces shortages of these missiles due to their consumption in conflicts involving Iran, leaving Europe exposed.
The EU’s answer is the “Elsa” program, an ambitious attempt to develop a domestic long-range strike capability. However, Elsa is not expected to be operational until 2030. The program is currently hampered by a lack of cohesion: frontline states like Poland and the Baltic nations are purchasing “off-the-shelf” American hardware because they cannot afford to wait, while funding powers like France resist paying for foreign systems. The result is a fragmented landscape where “Elsa” risks becoming a convenient label for disparate national projects rather than a unified European deterrent.
| Missile System | Estimated Range | Operational Status | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taurus / Storm Shadow | 300–500 km | Operational | EU (Germany/UK/FR) |
| Tomahawk | 1,600 km | Operational (US) | United States |
| Elsa Program | TBD (Long Range) | Projected 2030 | European Union |
The Rare Earths Bottleneck
The technical failure of the Elsa program is not merely a matter of funding or political will; it is a matter of physics, and chemistry. The construction of advanced missile systems requires rare earth elements, a market controlled almost entirely by China. This dependency is the “dark force” undermining the EU’s strategic goals.
In an attempt to diversify, the EU has looked toward Canada. Mark Carney, the first non-European leader invited to the EPC, has moved to integrate Canada into the “Safe” program for joint defense procurement. Ottawa is offering a critical partnership in raw materials, providing a lifeline for an industry that is increasingly wary of the “American umbrella” and the Chinese monopoly.
However, the stability of these supply chains is subject to the volatile nature of U.S.-China relations. The precedent set in April 2025, when Donald Trump imposed tariffs exceeding 140 percent on Chinese goods, led to immediate retaliation from Beijing in the form of rare earth export restrictions. The resulting global supply chain shock forced a U.S. Retreat, but it left European industry—already struggling with Chinese blocks—in a precarious position.
The Risk of a Two-Way Deal
The most immediate threat to European autonomy lies in the potential for a preferential agreement between Washington and Beijing. With Donald Trump scheduled to visit China on May 14 and 15, the agenda is expected to center on Iran, tariffs, and the extension of the rare earth truce. Europe is not seated at this table.
If the U.S. Secures a preferential deal for rare earths for American companies, the European industrial base will be relegated to the sidelines. Without these materials, the European long-range missile remains a blueprint. The distance between declaring autonomy and actually possessing it is measured in the tons of minerals that the EU cannot yet source independently.
The European Political Community’s efforts to diversify allies and energy sources are necessary, but they are insufficient if the material foundation is missing. The EU cannot afford to remain a “medium power” in a world of resource giants. The upcoming results of the U.S.-China summit will determine whether the project of strategic autonomy has a viable path forward or if it has simply run out of time.
The next critical checkpoint will be the official readout of the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing, which will reveal whether the U.S. Has secured exclusive access to the materials essential for the next generation of Western defense hardware.
We invite our readers to share their perspectives on the EU’s resource dependency in the comments below or via our social channels.
