In the current era of media fragmentation, the traditional television network is fighting a war of attrition. Audiences no longer gather around a single screen at a scheduled time; instead, they scatter across a thousand different streaming apps, social feeds, and on-demand libraries. For most executives, the solution has been to produce more content in hopes of catching a stray viewer. Keisha Taylor Starr, however, decided to stop competing on volume and start competing on connection.
As the Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer, and General Manager of Scripps Networks at The E.W. Scripps Company, Starr has spent the last 24 months executing a high-stakes pivot of ION. Once known primarily as a destination for procedural drama reruns, ION has been repositioned as a general entertainment powerhouse with a specific, aggressive bet on women’s sports. The result is not just a branding win, but a commercial one: ION earned the designation of Google TV’s most-watched free live channel in 2024.
Starr’s approach is a case study in “structural scarcity.” By identifying underserved audiences and carving out dedicated, predictable time slots for them—such as WNBA broadcasts on Friday nights and NWSL games on Saturday nights—she transformed a legacy network into a destination. In a landscape where sports fans often struggle to find their teams across a dizzying array of fragmented broadcast rights, Starr provided a consistent home.
The Shift from Creative Spend to P&L Ownership
For many CMOs, the role is defined by creative ambition: the quest for the boldest campaign or the most viral moment. But Starr’s trajectory shifted when she assumed the responsibilities of a General Manager, gaining direct ownership of the Profit and Loss (P&L) statement. This transition changed her fundamental evaluation of success.
When a marketer is solely responsible for the brand, the instinct is to pursue differentiation through creativity. When that same person is responsible for the margins, the framework shifts. According to Starr, financial rigor should not be viewed as a limitation on creativity, but as a clarifying tool. In her model, creative excellence is only justified if it generates tangible business value—whether through audience growth, increased advertiser satisfaction, or a direct lift in revenue.
This disciplined approach allowed ION to move beyond the “trend” phase of women’s sports. While other networks were discussing the growth of women’s athletics as a social talking point, Starr treated it as a franchise-level investment. By linking every marketing dollar to business value, she was able to justify the resources needed to build a sustainable sports ecosystem on a network that previously had little to no live sports presence.
Expanding the Definition of Sport
A central pillar of ION’s growth has been a deliberate expansion of what constitutes “sport.” Rather than adhering to a narrow definition of professional athletics, Starr’s portfolio strategy incorporates cheerleading competitions, women’s college basketball, and other emerging athletic categories.
Here’s a strategic move to capture “passion clusters”—niche but highly dedicated audiences that have historically been treated as peripheral content by major networks. By treating these categories as primary programming, ION achieved two goals simultaneously: it captured millions of underserved fans and signaled an organizational alignment with a diverse, modern consumer base.
The data suggests the bet paid off. Seven WNBA broadcasts on the network averaged over 1 million viewers, a metric that was previously considered unattainable for women’s sports outside of major championship events or traditional sports giants. This engagement proves that the demand for women’s sports is not a niche interest, but a massive, untapped market awaiting accessible distribution.
ION’s Strategic Pivot: A Comparison
| Strategic Element | Legacy ION Model | Starr’s Repositioned Model |
|---|---|---|
| Content Focus | Procedural drama reruns | General entertainment & live sports |
| Audience Strategy | Passive, asynchronous viewing | Active, appointment-based connection |
| Programming Logic | Volume-based filler | Structural scarcity (Fixed sports slots) |
| Success Metric | Reach and impressions | P&L value and audience engagement |
The Competitive Advantage of Connection
Starr’s success at ION is rooted in the belief that “connection” is the only sustainable competitive advantage left in a fragmented media landscape. In her view, the goal is to create “universal connectors”—events that give people a genuine reason to gather in real-time.
This strategy requires a level of risk that traditional networks often avoid. It involves making early bets on audiences before the market becomes saturated and competitors drive up the cost of rights. By moving early on the WNBA and NWSL, Scripps established a foothold that makes it tough for latecomers to displace them without paying a premium.
The broader implication for the media industry is clear: the “generalist” approach to broadcasting is failing. The winners will be those who can identify specific, passionate communities and build structural homes for them, blending the creative vision of a CMO with the financial discipline of a GM.
As the 2024-2025 sports calendar unfolds, the next critical checkpoint for ION will be the renewal and expansion of its broadcast rights and the integration of further “passion cluster” programming into its primetime lineup. These moves will determine if ION can maintain its status as a leader in the free live channel space.
Do you think the “appointment viewing” model can survive the streaming era, or is ION an outlier? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Worth a look
