Seren Serengil was heard as a witness regarding the murder of Şafak Mahmutyazıcıoğlu

by time news

2023-07-17 23:57:46

“NO TALK ABOUT THE WEAPON”

Seren Serengil, who was ordered to be brought by force three times to be heard as a witness, attended this hearing. In her statement, she said, “I was a friend of Ece and Şafak. We went to the condolences. The house was very crowded. There was a video call with a gentleman on the phone of Ece’s friend Sezer. The person on the phone said, “He came to me, I told him to surrender.” I just heard that. It’s pretty long. There was a conversation. There was no conversation between them about Galeria or the gun. We were in the same seat with Ece. I don’t remember the whole conversation. I said to Ece, ‘I don’t know anyone about what I’m going to witness.’ Ece asked me, ‘Don’t you remember they bought a gun? “I don’t remember, I said I didn’t want to come to court. I didn’t want to be an artist in these events,” he said.

Seren Serengil’s lover at that time Mustafa Rahman Tohma was also heard as a witness. Tohma said, “We went to Ece’s house for condolences. There was a phone call. I only stumbled upon 30 seconds. I’ve never heard of a gun issue or a threat issue. Then we went out,” he said.

Ali Yasak, who was given the right to speak at the hearing, said, “I am also a victim. Just as a bouncing bullet hit Şafak, it could have come to me. Thank God it did not. The allegations are unsupported, there is no proof. I demand my release.”

Safak Mahmutyaziciogludemanded the release of Kadir Yasak and other defendants who shot .

The court adjourned the hearing by deciding that the employee serving tea in the restaurant should be heard as a witness, that the prosecutor should report the requests for extension investigation, if any, or that he should prepare his opinion on the merits.

FROM THE CLAIM

In the indictment prepared by the Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, the incident was reported as follows: “An apartment registered in the name of Ahmet Yosunlu in Bakırköy was transferred to real estate agent Kerem Öztürk for its sale. While Öztürk was looking for a customer to sell this apartment, the complainant Suphi Malgaz, who lived on the top floor of the apartment, Suphi Malgaz told Kerem Öztürk that he had a friend who would buy the flat for 1 million 450 thousand TL. By selling the flat for 1 million 650 thousand TL, Malgaz received a commission of 170 thousand TL from the buyer.

After learning about this situation, Kerem Öztürk and Gökhan Karakan told Malgaz that he had to pay them this amount. When the parties could not reach an agreement, Gökhan Karakan threatened to have Malgaz killed. Gökhan Karakan reached Seccad Yeşil and asked him to collect the money in question. Seccad Yeşil told his friend Kadir Yasak about the situation.

Ban offered to meet with Suphi Malgaz. Şafak Mahmutyazıcıoğlu accompanied Suphi Malgaz during the meeting that took place in a restaurant in Bakırköy. Due to Mahmutyazıcıoğlu’s support for Malgaz, Kadir Yasak and Seccad Yeşil could not receive the money in question. Kadir Yasak and Seccad Yeşil targeted Şafak Mahmutyazıcıoğlu for this reason, on January 27. murderHe committed a crime.” In the indictment, aggravated life imprisonment for 4 different crimes and a total of 3 years 9 months to 12 years and 6 months imprisonment were requested for Ali Yasak and Abdulkadir Kara.

Kadir Yasak, Seccad Yeşil, Serkan Dakman, Fatih Okan Kodak, Burak Otçuoğlu and Uğurcan Bilge were demanded to be sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment for 3 different crimes and a total of 3 years 9 months to 10 years 6 months imprisonment.

It was demanded that Gökhan Karakan and Kerem Öztürk be sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment for 3 different crimes and a total of 3 years 9 months to 10 years and 6 months in prison each. Prison sentences at varying rates were requested for the other 9 defendants for the crime of ‘favoring the criminal’.

#Seren #Serengil #heard #witness #murder #Şafak #Mahmutyazıcıoğlu

You may also like

Leave a Comment