Conservative Commentator Issues Apology After False Claim About Ben Shapiro
A conservative commentator swiftly retracted a statement alleging that Ben Shapiro advocated for the stoning of homosexuals, issuing a public apology after facing widespread criticism and condemnation. The initial claim, made in response to a segment on Fox News featuring Jesse Watters, sparked immediate backlash given Shapiro’s previously stated positions on LGBTQ+ inclusion within the conservative movement.
The controversy began when the commentator responded to Watters’ description of shapiro as “not a controversial or closing figure,” but rather “a patriot.” According to reports from the hindustan Times, the commentator’s initial post ignited a strong reaction, with many pointing out Shapiro’s public statements welcoming homosexuals into the conservative fold.
Cruz Confronts commentator Over False Accusation
The situation escalated when Ted cruz, a Texan Senator, directly challenged the commentator, labeling the claim as “horrible, evil and twisted.” Responding to Cruz’s forceful rebuke, the commentator issued a full apology, stating, “The horrible, malicious and twisted liar apologizes.This is what happens when I read something on Twitter [or X] without checking the facts. It will not happen again.”
The commentator further emphasized their remorse, adding, “I was wrong and I apologize. I deleted the publication.” The Montreal Journal reported on the swift retraction and apology, highlighting the speed with which the commentator attempted to correct the record.
The incident underscores the dangers of relying on unverified information circulating on social media platforms. the commentator, whose name has not been widely circulated in reports, initially made the false claim on X (formerly Twitter) on November 26, 2023. The accusation stemmed from a misinterpretation of Shapiro’s discussion of religious texts and historical punishments. the commentator’s willingness to admit fault and apologize, while commendable, serves as a stark reminder of the importance of fact-checking before disseminating potentially damaging claims, notably in the highly charged political landscape. The incident also highlights the sensitivity surrounding discussions of LGBTQ+ rights and the potential for misinformation to fuel prejudice and division.
