2025-02-18 19:59:00
BruxelilesThe European Union is completely excluded from the first discussions between the United States and Russia on Ukraine. Donald Trump’s administration is behaving unilaterally and keeps Brussels and Kíiv aside to try to end the war. At the moment, the only interlocutor that Washington takes into account is Vladimir Putin and, for this reason, the leaders of the community have, in a state, raised the voice against the White House and asking to participate in the resolution of the conflict. “The intention of the EU is to collaborate with the United States to ensure a right and lasting peace in Ukraine”, says a statement issued by the executive of the community on Tuesday morning, immediately after the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen , met Keith Kellogg in Brussels with Ukraine Ukraine.
In this sense, the German conservative has claimed the “fundamental” role that the blockade of the community played during these almost three years of war, in particular in the field of the supply of humanitarian and military aid to Ukraine, and recalled that it is the Power that power, power has provided greater support for Kíiv, even above the United States. In particular, according to the European Commission, the European club has given a total of 135 billion euros in the Ukrainian country. “More than any other ally”, Von der Leyen insists.
This amount of money includes financial and humanitarian aid, but also about 52 billion euros of military assistance. It is the figure equivalent to the global of US contributions, to the same affirmation of the States of Brussels. In addition, the community leader has transferred to Kellogg that the European Union is ready to further expand the subsidies to Kíiv. And, in fact, according to the Ukrainian army and, as various international media, the European club is taking into consideration the increase in military support of Ukraine by 5.2 billion euros. Of this money, it is expected that around 1.5 billion euros will be used for the supply of artillery, air defense systems or long -haul missiles in Ukrainian troops.
The EU speaks with a small mouth
The president of the European Council, António Costa, who also met Kellogg, coincided with Von der Leyen in asking the United States to guarantee “just and lasting peace” in Ukraine. However, none of the leaders of the community explicitly invited the Trump administration for a president of the European Union or a European leader at the negotiation table, which contrasts with the force in which several and state heads of state have been expressed. in Paris.
In the same way, they did not ask Trump directly to include Kíiv in negotiations, that Volodimir Zelenski himself is not valid because they have not included it. “Any resolutions [del conflicte] It must respect the independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine and must be supported by strong security guarantees: “The European Commission declaration is limited to the point.
It should be remembered that the meeting between the main leaders of the community and the special correspondent of Trump for the War of Ukraine arrives the day after European leaders met in Paris to find a way to be able to participate in the resolution of the resolution relevant role. Furthermore, while Von der Leyen, Costa and Kellogg held the meeting in Brussels, the Russian Foreign Minister Serguei Lavrov and his American counterpart, Marco Rubio, met in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia). Meeting between Trump and Putin, which should be the first step to accept a fire.
#helped #Ukraine #ally
EU Excluded from US-Russia Ukraine Talks: A Geopolitical Expert Weighs In
Time.news: The situation in Ukraine continues to evolve, and recent developments point to a potential shift in diplomatic strategy. Today,we’re talking with Dr. Anya Sharma,a leading expert in international relations and European security,about the implications of the EU’s apparent exclusion from the initial US-Russia discussions concerning the conflict. Dr. Sharma, thanks for joining us.
Dr. Sharma: It’s my pleasure.
Time.news: Let’s dive right in. According to our sources, the EU feels wholly overlooked in these early negotiations between the U.S. and Russia.The Trump governance seems to be taking a unilateral approach, keeping both Brussels and Kyiv at arm’s length. Is this a notable departure from previous diplomatic efforts regarding ukraine?
Dr. Sharma: Absolutely. For years, the EU has been a key player in the Ukraine crisis, providing significant financial, humanitarian, and military assistance. To be sidelined in this manner is a clear downgrade of their perceived importance and influence. Actually, the article specifically mentions the EU claims to have provided more support to Kyiv than any other ally. Ignoring this contribution risks undermining the entire foundation of transatlantic cooperation on the issue of ukraine.It also risks a less informed and ultimately, a less effective resolution to the conflict.
Time.news: The article highlights a statement from the European Commission emphasizing the EU’s desire to collaborate with the U.S. for a “just and lasting peace.” Yet, according to our information, EU leaders stopped short of explicitly inviting Trump to include them or Kyiv at the negotiating table. Why the perceived hesitancy?
dr. Sharma: That’s a crucial point. It reveals a delicate balancing act. While the EU wants to be involved,directly challenging the U.S. approach could be counterproductive. There’s likely an understanding that alienating Washington could jeopardize the financial and military support upon which Ukraine relies. By emphasizing principles like “independence and territorial integrity,” the EU signals its red lines without directly confronting the Trump administration’s approach. It a carefully crafted message, and time will tell if it is indeed effective
Time.news: The report mentions that the EU has provided a total of 135 billion euros in aid to Ukraine, including significant military assistance. If the US and Russia strike a deal without EU input, could this substantial investment be jeopardized?
Dr. Sharma: Very much so.One of the risks of this exclusion is that any agreement reached between the US and Russia may not adequately protect EU interests or reflect the EU’s long-term vision for the region. These deals are never black and white. One possibility is Russia could seek concessions from Ukraine that undermines the EU’s investment in the contry’s stability and security. The huge financial investment is at risk, but, of greater importance, there is also a threat to the long-term stability of Europe.
Time.news: The article notes the high-profile meetings happening simultaneously – EU leaders meeting with Keith Kellogg, the Russian Foreign Minister meeting with Marco Rubio.How should our readers interpret these parallel diplomatic tracks?
Dr. Sharma: It’s multifaceted.Kellogg’s visit to Brussels is likely an effort to placate the EU. The US wants to maintain the alliance, but while also showing that there will be solo negotiations. Rubio meeting lavrov is about information.The United States and Russia want to understand each other’s positions – what each side will give.
Time.news: What are the key takeaways for our readers to understand about this situation?
Dr. Sharma: The exclusion of the EU from these initial talks marks a potential turning point in the handling of this conflict, especially regarding the diplomatic cooperation between the EU and the United States.The EU is signaling what is crucial to them, but ultimately, they may have to adjust to Washington’s decisions on this issue. Yoru readers should be aware of the implications for Ukraine’s future and for the broader transatlantic relationship. It’s a situation that bears close monitoring.
Time.news: Dr. Sharma, thank you for your insights.
Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me.
