2023-05-15 01:18:18
Matchday 34, in the absence of Real Betis-Rayo Vallecano that takes place this Monday, has closed with a good number of controversial plays through the fields of Spain, being without a doubt those of the change of Camavinga in Real Madrid-Getafe and the disallowed goal against Valladolid against Sevilla the most striking of the weekend.
Real Sociedad – Girona
Minute 2: Figueroa Vázquez penalizes an action by Riquelme on Kubo as a penalty. The referee considers that there is a demolition, but what I see is a slight contact that is not enough to signal the eleven meters.
Minute 62: Oyarzabal fell into the Girona area and asked for a penalty for tripping his defender. He drops down. This is how the referee understands it, who rightly admonishes the striker of the Basque team.
Minutes 84 and 92: Lenormand and Silva requested a penalty respectively. The referee correctly did not point out anything, but he failed to admonish both for trying to deceive him.
Real Madrid-Getafe
Minute 12: Valverde’s shot that hits Mitrovic. They ask for maximum penalty per hand. It doesn’t look like he hits her arm. In any case, he has it in a natural position, close to the body. Martínez Munuera is correct in not pointing out anything.
Minute 83: A substitution occurs. Asensio leaves and Odriozola enters. At that time the change is effective. There is no need to restart the game. As soon as Asensio left, they told him that his teammate Camavinga was injured, so he re-entered the pitch. Then the referee, mistakenly, allows Odriozola to be replaced by the Frenchman. Be careful that if Getafe appeals this action it could be considered improper alignment, if they analyze that the five substitutions had already been made.
Villarreal – Athletic Club
Minute 45: Parejo grabbed Yuri on the edge of the Villarreal area. Del Cerro whistles a foul because he considers that the action is out. The VAR reviews the play and tells the referee that the action starts outside but ends inside and therefore it is a penalty. Well the help of video arbitration in this play.
Elche – Athletic
Minute 43: Throw-in from Elche that ends in a goal. Lautaro Blanco had part of his left foot inside the field. The goal should not have been awarded although VAR cannot enter in this case. He cannot intervene in the poor execution of a throw-in or free kick.
Minute 44: In the El he area, Gimenez is going to finish off with a header, Badia comes out to try to clear, and takes the Atlético player ahead. It was a penalty that Muñiz Ruiz does not indicate, and that the Var does not notify so that he can see it repeated
Valladolid – Sevilla
Min 45+3: Larin wins the action against Bade, and faces the goal. Bade knocks him down when it was an obvious goal occasion. The referee does not whistle and allows the action to continue. However, in the replay you can see how Larin takes the ball with his hand before the takedown, and if something is sanctioned it would be the attacker’s hand.
Minutes 45+4: After a rebound, the ball falls to Monchu, who shoots from outside the area, and scores. The goal does not go up on the scoreboard because just before the referee is signaling the end of the first half because added time had expired. The decision is correct from a regulatory point of view. Why leave another shot? And if that one fails and there is another rebound, should it also be left? It’s just bad luck. He before turns around to signal the end and Monchu scores the goal of his life.
Minute 57: Goal annulled to Bade who finishes off with a header but clearly leans on the defender. Well cancelled.
#Valladolids #goal #disallowed #bad #luck