The PT member did not participate in the Republican inauguration, but the decision was already unexpected, considering that it is tradition in the United States not to invite heads of state
Lula criticized Trump, but is now trying to overcome tensions
The President of Brazil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silvaannounced that he will not be present at the inauguration ceremony of the Donald Trump as president of the United States. In an interview with CNN Internacional, Lula stressed his desire to maintain a civil and democratic relationship with Trump, even after expressing support for his opponent’s candidacy. Kamala Harris. The Brazilian leader underlined the importance of putting national interests before personal political differences, highlighting his diplomatic experiences with former US presidents, such as Barack Obama, Joe Biden and George W. Bush, to ensure the continuity of bilateral relations.
Lula’s decision not to attend Trump’s inauguration is not unexpected, considering it is tradition in the United States not to invite heads of state to such events. Brazil will be represented by the ambassador in Washington, ensuring that diplomacy between the two countries continues to flow. During the election campaign Lula had criticized Trump, but now he is trying to overcome tensions and focus on diplomacy, especially in strategic sectors such as agri-food. The relationship between Brazil and the United States is considered crucial, and Itamaraty will play a vital role in maintaining these ties, regardless of political differences.
Follow the Jovem Pan Entretenimento channel and receive the main news on your WhatsApp!
Another point of focus is Trump’s immigration policy, which includes measures such as border closures and deportations, which could have a direct impact on Brazil. The Brazilian government will need to prepare to welcome citizens returning to the country, as the issue was a central theme in Trump’s campaign. This policy could have repercussions on the Brazilian economy, especially in terms of inflation and the labor market, requiring a strategic response from the government to mitigate possible negative effects.
*With information from André Anelli
*Report produced with the help of artificial intelligence
Interview: Time.news Editor Talks with Diplomatic Expert on Lula’s Decision
Time.news Editor: Welcome to our audience! Today, we’re delving into a fascinating diplomatic moment—Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s decision to skip the inauguration of Donald Trump. Joining me is Dr. Maria Costa, a renowned expert on international relations and Latin American politics. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Costa.
Dr. Maria Costa: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: To start, let’s unpack Lula’s choice not to attend the inauguration. Many saw this as a significant political move. What were your initial thoughts?
Dr. Costa: Lula’s decision aligns with a broader tradition in the U.S. where heads of state aren’t typically invited to presidential inaugurations. However, it also reflects his strategic approach to diplomacy. By not attending but still sending an ambassador, he signals a commitment to maintaining bilateral relations while also taking a stand based on his campaign statements.
Editor: That’s an interesting perspective. Lula had been quite vocal about his criticisms of Trump during the campaign. How might this decision influence future relations between Brazil and the United States?
Dr. Costa: Indeed, Lula had expressed support for Trump’s opponent, Kamala Harris. However, his current stance indicates a desire to reset the relationship. By prioritizing diplomatic channels over personal grievances, Lula is also emphasizing national interests—particularly in key sectors such as agribusiness, which is vital for both countries’ economies.
Editor: Speaking of agribusiness, how critical is it for Brazil to maintain a strong partnership with the U.S. in that sector?
Dr. Costa: Quite critical. The U.S. is a powerful player in global trade, and Brazil is one of the largest agricultural exporters. Cooperation in this area can lead to mutual benefits—better trade agreements, innovation in sustainable practices, and higher market access. Lula seems to understand the stakes and is attempting to navigate this complex landscape wisely.
Editor: In light of Lula’s diplomatic history, how does his experience with other U.S. presidents play a role in this situation?
Dr. Costa: Lula’s experience with Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and even George W. Bush offers him a unique perspective on U.S.-Brazil relations. These interactions have likely shaped his understanding of how to engage effectively with U.S. leadership, regardless of personal ideologies. His approach seems to draw from those past experiences, aiming for constructive dialogue rather than confrontation.
Editor: So, what should we anticipate moving forward? Will this decision to not attend the inauguration set a precedent for future Brazilian leaders?
Dr. Costa: It’s hard to say definitively, but Lula’s move may encourage a more tempered and pragmatic approach to diplomatic relations that prioritizes national interests over personal political rivalries. Future leaders might take note of this strategy, particularly in an era where global issues demand cooperation regardless of differing political landscapes.
Editor: Fantastic insights, Dr. Costa. It’s certainly a pivotal moment for Brazil and its diplomatic relations. Thank you for sharing your expertise with us today!
Dr. Costa: Thank you for having me. I look forward to seeing how this unfolds in the coming months!