Conservative ruling platform – Proposal to create the United Nations… Power think tanks in Washington[글로벌 포커스]

by times news cr

Trump’s second term’s talent cradle think tank ‘AFPI’
The brains behind US politics
⁢ ⁤ ⁣ ‘Active political intervention’ original heritage… When reagan took office, he ​issued ⁣a 3,000-page guide.
⁢ ⁢ ‍ Brookings established concepts such⁤ as the Marshall Plan… criticized for “inciting ​polarization in⁤ American‌ politics”

⁤ ⁣⁢ ‌ “Think tanks are⁣ active⁣ in Washington, the capital of ‌the united States.”

There are⁢ so ‍many different think tanks​ active in washington ⁢politics that there is even a joke about⁤ this. Political‌ parties and politicians work‍ with think tanks to analyze policies and⁤ develop agendas. Various‍ reports independently ‍published by think tanks based‌ in⁤ Washington are of great ⁣interest not‍ only to the U.S. government ‍and Congress, but also to ⁢governments and media in other countries. The influence of Washington think tanks is ‍literally considerable. ​Actually, the ‘2020 Global Think Tank Index Report’​ published by the⁤ University‍ of Pennsylvania’s‍ lauder Institute evaluating 11,175 think tanks around the world also lists ‍think ​tanks centered in Washington, such as ⁢the Carnegie ⁣Endowment for International Peace,​ the Center for Strategic and International ​Studies (CSIS), and the ​Rand Institute.⁢ Tanks were included ⁤in‍ the top 20.

At one‌ time, ⁤American think tanks focused on non-partisan policy research to⁢ the extent that they were ⁣called ‘universities without students.’ The emergence of the conservative think tank Heritage ⁢Foundation in 1973 is cited as an prospect for the current strong partisanship. The⁣ Heritage ​Foundation has actively ⁤intervened in real-world politics‍ to the point where it is called a ‘do-action tank’ rather then a ‘think-tank’.⁤

In particular, in 1981, upon the inauguration of then-president Ronald Reagan, a​ Republican, he drew attention by publishing a ⁣mission statement of ​over ‌3,000 pages called ‘Guidelines for Leadership.’ Former President Reagan actually⁤ adopted 60%⁢ of ‌the foundation’s 2,000 policy proposals‍ containing conservative ⁣philosophy, such as deregulation and reduction of government spending.

The‍ Heritage Foundation‌ also supplied ‍manpower to work in the White House and the administration. There are about 70 current and⁤ former officials from the Heritage Foundation who entered ​the administration in 2017, the first year of President-elect Donald Trump’s first term in office. Ahead of this presidential election, the ‘Project 2025’ report was also released, wich contains ⁣various plans when President-elect Trump ‍returns to power. Personnel who will play crucial roles in⁤ Trump’s second ‍administration also participated in writing this report. Tom Horman, the ‘border czar’ who will be responsible for illegal‌ immigration policy, ⁣Caroline Levitt, the White House press secretary, and Peter navarro, senior advisor ‍for trade and⁢ manufacturing,‌ were involved in writing ‘Project 2025’.

While the conservative​ camp has the Heritage Foundation, the progressive camp has the Brookings ​Institution, established in 1916.The Brookings Institution established basic concepts such⁤ as the creation⁢ of​ the United Nations after‍ World War II and the ⁤’Marshall Plan’, America’s support plan for Europe. It was⁣ selected as ​the ‘world’s best think⁢ tank’ by the Lauder Institute for ​three consecutive years ⁢from 2017 to 2019.⁢

The⁣ Center⁣ for American Progress (CAP), which was established in 2003 as a‌ ‘progressive heritage foundation’,​ cannot be left out. CAP, ‌with ⁢its ‘big picture’ and‍ action capabilities,⁢ exerted great⁤ influence during the Obama ‌administration, to the point where ‍it was called the ‘brain’ of former President Barack Obama. ⁤he was also involved in ⁤the design of former President ​Obama’s representative‌ policy,​ the ‘Affordable Care Act’. The person who led the​ ‘Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)’, a key project of the Joe⁣ Biden administration, is also the founder of CAP, John Podesta.​

However, there is‌ also criticism that major ⁣think tanks ⁢have contributed to the polarization of American politics. EJ Pagan, a professor at the University of Illinois at chicago, said ‍in a conversation with the Niskanen Center, a centrist think ⁣tank, “When the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) releases a budget estimate for a⁢ specific policy, Heritage will ‘cost less​ than that’ ‌and CAP will ‘cost more.’ “It only produces details that is advantageous to each camp,” he criticized.

park In-hwi, a professor at the Graduate⁢ School⁣ of International Studies at ewha Womans University

Large think tanks specializing ​in diplomacy and security, social integration, and small ​think ​tanks that respond promptly to specific agendas, such as the America First⁤ Policy Institute ⁢(AFPI), which attracted ⁤attention in‌ the wake of this presidential election, will form a division system​ in the future. “Each⁤ person will play his or her own role,” he predicted.

deep ⁤dive

today and tomorrow

Reporter⁢ Hong Jeong-su hong@donga.com

Hot ​news now

What are​ the ⁤key ‌differences between conservative⁤ and progressive think ‌tanks in the United States? ⁤

Interview: The ‍Rise⁣ and Role of Think Tanks in American Politics

Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome,and thank you⁤ for joining us⁣ today. We’re here with Dr. Emily jacobs, an expert on political institutions‌ and the impact‌ of think tanks in ⁢American governance. Dr. Jacobs, the recent article​ highlighted the influence ‌of ⁤think⁣ tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the Brookings Institution in shaping policy ​and political ⁤landscapes. Could you start by explaining⁤ how think tanks have ‍evolved over the decades?

Dr. ⁢Emily Jacobs (EJ): Absolutely, thanks for having me. ​Think tanks have indeed undergone significant conversion​ since‌ their emergence. Initially, organizations like Brookings were ​seen as⁣ non-partisan research entities—what some affectionately referred to as “universities without students.” Over time, especially with the rise⁤ of the Heritage ​Foundation in‌ the 1970s, ‌we saw a ⁢shift towards more⁤ partisan advocacy. This change has ‍led to think tanks becoming more ‍involved in direct political action, rather than solely⁤ focusing on research and analysis.

TNE: It’s interesting how you’ve ⁤noted this transition. The term “do-action tank” was used to describe the heritage Foundation. How ​has‌ this proactive approach changed the relationship between‍ think tanks and the political landscape, especially​ regarding ‌parties and⁤ politicians?

EJ: The proactive approach has made think tanks instrumental in the policymaking‌ process. They‌ not ‌only analyze opinions but actively shape them. As a notable example, when Reagan took office, he ⁤implemented around 60% of⁢ the Heritage ​Foundation’s⁣ proposals, showing just how influential these organizations can be.​ In the current political environment, we ⁢see ⁢that‌ figures involved with think tanks, such as ​those who contributed ‌to Trump’s ‘Project 2025,’ are ​gearing up ‌to influence the next administration directly. This connection between think tanks and policymakers further ‌deepens partisan divides and⁤ influences election⁣ cycles.

TNE: ‌You ⁤mentioned ‘Project 2025.’ Can you elaborate on ⁢its implications‌ for Trump’s potential ​second term and the ‌role think tanks play in⁤ preparing political ⁣agendas?

EJ: ⁢ ‘Project 2025′ serves as a ‌roadmap for how a ‌second ⁢Trump administration might operate, outlining‍ key policy initiatives that align with conservative principles.‌ The ⁤involvement of key personnel who have successively participated⁣ in ⁣shaping Trump’s ‍policy agenda reveals how think tanks ‍provide not only‌ ideas‌ but ‍also the human capital that bridges⁤ the gap between⁣ research and implementation.​ Think ⁢tanks thus become funnels for talent and policy, crucial for political leaders in framing their administrations’ directions.

TNE: The article also mentioned the Brookings Institution‍ and the Center for‍ American ⁣Progress as counterparts to the Heritage Foundation. how do these progressive think tanks influence the political discourse and respond to their conservative counterparts?

EJ: Progressive think tanks like Brookings and CAP play ⁢a critical ​role in‌ counterbalancing the strong conservative narratives propagated‌ by organizations like⁤ Heritage.As an example, Brookings⁢ has been instrumental in developing foundational policies that ‍have shaped the global​ landscape, like the Marshall Plan or ⁢the establishment of the United Nations. CAP, ‌being the ‌more contemporary option for‍ progressives, ⁢aims to synthesize a broader vision​ while retaining actionable insights. Their‍ challenge is to present compelling narratives that ​resonate with voters, especially as the political climate grows increasingly polarized.

TNE: Speaking of polarization, the article suggests that think tanks might be contributing to this issue.Can⁤ you discuss how their involvement ​influences public opinion and the overall political ⁣climate?

EJ: think tanks, ​by aligning themselves closely with partisan ⁤interests and taking active roles in advocacy, can deepen political polarization. By promoting specific agendas ​and narratives, they frequently ​enough create echo chambers that reinforce existing beliefs rather than foster discourse. This fragmentation can lead to increased‍ animosity between parties and make bipartisan cooperation more ⁢challenging. Their ⁤research is frequently enough viewed through a selective ​lens which can distort ​public⁣ debate and hinder effective policy-making.

TNE: ⁤ Thank ⁢you, Dr. Jacobs. For⁢ the final question, what are your thoughts⁢ on the ⁢future role of ‌think‍ tanks in American​ politics? Are⁢ they likely⁤ to adapt, or⁣ do you foresee⁤ a continuation of the current ​trend?

EJ: Think⁢ tanks ⁤will undoubtedly‍ remain relevant in American politics,‍ especially ⁣in our current ⁤era characterized by hyper-partisanship. However, there may be a⁣ future shift in how⁢ they operate, especially if there’s‌ a growing ⁣demand for collaboration and more ​constructive engagement across the aisle. The future may also witness⁤ the rise of new think tanks that could ⁤focus on bridging divides rather⁤ than deepening them. ‌As societal ‌challenges evolve,⁣ the adaptability of these organizations will be key to⁣ maintaining their⁤ influence and legitimacy.

TNE: ⁢ Dr. Jacobs, it’s been‌ a pleasure talking with you today. Your insights into the role of think ⁤tanks‌ in shaping policy‍ and political dialogue paint a complex yet fascinating picture of American governance. Thank you for joining us.

EJ: Thank you for having ‌me! It’s been⁢ a great⁢ discussion.

You may also like

Leave a Comment