They propose to prohibit the sale of blues in Edomex

by times news cr

The ‍Morenoist deputy María José Pérez Domínguezpresented in the Congress of the State of Mexico an initiative to prohibit the sale of pitufos o azulitosalcoholic⁤ beverages mixed with energizers, “due to their risks to health ⁣ for Mexicans, especially the ⁣new generations,”⁣ he said.

On behalf of the parliamentary group ⁢of Morena ⁣ He ​said that this ⁢measure seeks to reform the Competitiveness ​Law y Commercial Regulationthe Municipal Organic Law and the Administrative‍ CodeIn addition, it proposed sanctioning, suspending or⁣ canceling establishments that sell​ said liquor with ‌characteristics of blue color that ‌mask the flavor and increase the levels of excitement, derived from the⁤ ingredients that make ​it up.

You may be ​interested in: How ​many ‌calories does ​a “little⁣ blue” contain ‍and what does the Health Sector say about consumption?

The proposal argues that these drinks can ⁢cause a false ‌sense of sobriety, which ⁣translates into severe damage to health,⁣ such as severe ⁢poisonings, arrhythmias, cardiomyopathies and even ⁣sudden‍ death, ​also increases ⁤the ⁤ risk of accidents and serious complications, ‍since consumers believe they are capable​ of driving vehicles ⁢or​ making decisions that may put their lives​ and the lives of others at risk.

When detailing the effects of the azulitos, He noted: “Recent studies reveal⁣ that those also ⁤known⁢ as pitufos They⁢ have⁤ a direct effect on the body, the most common being liver poisoning that has symptoms such as headache, dilation of the pupils,⁣ vomiting, tachycardia, high blood pressure, among others.”

You ‌may be interested in:‌ Melanie case: This⁣ we know about Christian, her ‍attacker

The⁤ legislator‍ stressed that ‌they ‍have the obligation to incorporate⁣ regulatory precepts that benefit everyone, guaranteeing their rights to health‍ and contributing to their well-being, which‍ is​ why “its consumption contributes​ to 3 ‌million deaths⁢ annually​ worldwide, while At​ the national level, every year they⁣ die 24 thousand people in accidents“, ​our country being seventh in the⁤ world in ⁣deaths from this cause.”‌

They warn⁤ about their excessive consumption

The Institute of ‍ Security and Social Services of⁣ State Workers (ISSSTE) ⁤recently issued a warns about ​the​ dangers of excessive⁣ consumption of blueberries, popular alcoholic drink among young people.

You may be interested: Three suspects arrested for the death of Liam Payne

The famous tonic combines vodka, soda and energy drinks sweetened with ⁤gummies or‌ chamoy, which hides ⁣the effects​ of alcohol that can cause abuse in its consumption and cause consequences.

Among the consequences is the increased risk of obesity, diabetes, increased‍ glucose and increased blood pressuresince one liter‌ can have up to ‍730 ⁣kilocalories.

Interview: Time.news Editor ​Explores ​Health Risks of “Pitufos” with Health Expert

Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re discussing a pressing public ⁤health issue that has ⁤caught the attention of lawmakers in Mexico—an initiative presented by‍ Morenoist deputy María ‍José Pérez Domínguez to ban the sale of alcoholic beverages known as “pitufos” or “azulitos.” These drinks, which ⁤combine alcohol and energizing ingredients,‍ are thought to ⁣pose significant health risks, particularly for younger​ generations. Joining ‌us is⁢ Dr. ⁢Laura Mendoza, a public health expert with extensive experience in substance-related health⁢ impacts. Dr. Mendoza, ⁢thank you for being here.

Dr. Mendoza: ‍Thank​ you for having me. It’s a pleasure ‍to discuss such ​an important topic.

Editor: To start, could you explain why the sale of these ‌blue-colored alcoholic beverages is being targeted in this initiative?

Dr. Mendoza: Certainly! The⁤ initiative highlights⁢ several health concerns related to ⁣”pitufos.” These drinks‌ can create ‍a false sense of sobriety due to their energizing ​components, which mask the‍ effects of alcohol. This deception can lead to severe consequences,​ including overdose, accidents, and dangerous​ behavior, as consumers may⁢ feel capable of driving or making unsafe decisions.

Editor: That‍ raises a critical point about the perception of‌ sobriety.‍ What specific health risks are associated with consuming‌ these beverages?

Dr. Mendoza: ‍Recent studies indicate that the ​consumption of “azulitos” can lead to⁢ severe poisoning⁤ and acute‌ health ​issues. Common symptoms include ‌liver damage,⁤ headaches, pupil dilation, vomiting, tachycardia, and ‌high blood pressure. ​There are even risks of ​arrhythmias‍ and more ⁤severe conditions like cardiomyopathies, which can lead to sudden death in extreme cases.

Editor: It⁢ sounds incredibly alarming. Deputy Domínguez mentioned⁢ increasing penalties for establishments⁣ selling these drinks. How⁣ effective do you think such regulations could be in mitigating these ‌health risks?

Dr. ‍Mendoza: ‌ Regulations can be a powerful tool in public health. By sanctioning establishments ‌that sell harmful ⁤products, ⁢we‍ can reduce access ⁢to these drinks, particularly⁤ for vulnerable populations like young people. This initiative could also serve to raise awareness about⁣ the ​dangers of mixing alcohol with energizers, potentially ⁤shifting ​consumer habits‍ toward safer choices.

Editor: Furthermore, how ⁤should the government approach education alongside these regulatory measures?

Dr. Mendoza: Education is‌ essential. It can help inform the ‌public ​about the risks associated with these beverages and the misleading perceptions​ they create. Schools, communities, and health‍ agencies should collaborate to implement awareness campaigns focusing on the health implications of alcohol use, especially among youth. Combining education with policy change could lead to a more comprehensive approach to reducing alcohol-related⁤ harm.

Editor: As we discuss these measures, do you see⁤ any potential backlash from consumers or ⁢businesses regarding the​ proposed bans?

Dr. Mendoza: There’s often resistance‍ to⁣ bans or regulations, especially from businesses benefiting from these products. ‌However,⁤ public support typically grows⁤ when ⁢there is awareness of the health risks involved.⁣ Engaging​ stakeholders ‌early in the process, including businesses ​and community members, can foster understanding and collaboration, making it easier to implement these necessary changes.

Editor: In closing, Dr. Mendoza, what final thoughts do you have⁣ for our‍ readers ⁤on the topic of “pitufos” and the broader implications for public health in Mexico?

Dr. Mendoza: It’s crucial to recognize ⁢that public‌ health policies should prioritize‍ safety and well-being, especially for vulnerable ​populations like young people. The initiative to ban “pitufos”‌ is a step⁣ toward a healthier future, but it should‌ be part of‍ a more extensive effort​ to educate, regulate, and promote⁤ healthier ‌lifestyle choices. Awareness and action can greatly reduce‌ the‌ risks associated ‍with these dangerous beverages.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Mendoza, for your insights on ‍this ‌important topic.‌ It’s clear that⁤ addressing​ the risks ​associated with ⁤”pitufos” ⁣requires a multifaceted approach involving regulation, education, and public engagement.⁤ We appreciate your time!

Dr. Mendoza: Thank you⁤ for having me, and let’s hope for positive changes in public health⁣ policy!

You may also like

Leave a Comment