The posts of 11 directors of Bangladesh Cricket Board including Nazmul Hasan Papon have been cancelled. As the directors were absent from three meetings of the Board of Directors, their posts were canceled as per the constitution of BCB.
BCB’s 15th board meeting on Wednesday (October 30) abolished the posts of 11 absent directors. BCB confirmed the matter in a statement after the board meeting.
According to the constitution of BCB, absentee from three or more consecutive board meetings without showing any reason shall be considered void.
The directors who lost their posts are Nazmul Hasan Papon, Ismail Haider Mallick, Shafiul Alam Chowdhury Nadel, Manzoor Quader, AJM Nasir, Sheikh Sohail, Anwarul Islam, Tanveer Ahmed Titu, Obed Rashid Nizam, Gazi Golam Mortoza and Najeeb Ahmed.
Since the fall of the Sheikh Hasina government, these directors have been hiding. So far none of them have been seen in public.
Khaled Mahmud Sujan, Naimur Rahman Durjoy and Enayet Hossain Siraj resigned voluntarily. The current committee accepted their resignations in today’s meeting.
Earlier, the National Sports Council (NSC) canceled the representation of Jalal Yunus and Ahmed Sazzadul Alam Bobby. They were replaced by Nazmul Abedin Fahim and Farooq Ahmed. Then Farooq Ahmed was made BCB president through 9 active directors including the two of them.
Apart from Farooq and Fahim, the elected directors of Papon’s board still include Iftekhar Ahmed Mithu, Fahim Sinha, Akram Khan, Mahbub Anam, Salauddin Chowdhury, Kazi Inam Ahmed and Saiful Alam Swapan.
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = ”
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
Interview between Time.news Editor and Cricket Governance Expert
Editor: Welcome to Time.news. Today, we have a special guest, Dr. Farhan Malik, a noted expert in sports governance and cricket administration. We’re here to discuss the recent decision by the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) to cancel the posts of 11 of its directors, including the prominent Nazmul Hasan Papon. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Malik.
Dr. Farhan Malik: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. The decision to cancel these directors’ positions stems from their absence from three consecutive meetings. How significant is this move in the context of cricket governance in Bangladesh?
Dr. Malik: It’s quite significant. The BCB’s decision to remove these directors underscores the importance of accountability within the governing body of cricket. The constitution is clear – absence from meetings without valid reasons is a serious matter. This action may signal a shift towards stricter adherence to governance practices, which is essential for the overall health of cricket in the country.
Editor: Many of these directors have not been seen in public since the political climate shifted following the fall of the Sheikh Hasina government. How do political factors intertwine with sports administration, particularly in countries like Bangladesh?
Dr. Malik: Politics and sports are often deeply intertwined, especially in cricket-loving nations like Bangladesh. The political instability can lead to changes in leadership within sports bodies. The fact that these directors have been absent could suggest that they feel insecure in their positions or are directly affected by the political turmoil. This setback for the BCB might be an opportunity for a restructuring that prioritizes cricket over politics.
Editor: With Nazmul Hasan Papon being a well-known figure in Bangladeshi cricket, how do you think the absence of such prominent personalities will affect the board’s operations and decision-making process moving forward?
Dr. Malik: Papon’s absence, along with the other directors, creates a vacuum that may affect both decision-making and the direction in which BCB can head. However, it’s also an opportunity for new leadership to emerge. Fresh perspectives can lead to innovative strategies for development and governance. This could also influence the morale of the players and the general public’s trust in the board.
Editor: What do you think the BCB can do to regain public and stakeholder confidence after such a controversial decision?
Dr. Malik: Transparency will be key. The BCB needs to communicate clearly about their governance processes and ensure that their actions align with the established constitution. They should also engage with stakeholders, including former players, current players, and fans, to rebuild trust. Furthermore, implementing a more stringent attendance policy and establishing accountability measures will help to prevent future issues.
Editor: Before we conclude, what message would you like to send to the current and future leaders of cricket administration in Bangladesh?
Dr. Malik: I would urge them to focus on the integrity and sustainability of cricket in Bangladesh. Governance should prioritize the sport and its stakeholders. Emphasizing a culture of accountability can ultimately lead to a more robust cricketing environment. Embrace the changes and challenges, and use them to foster a cricketing legacy that future generations can be proud of.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Malik, for your insightful perspectives today. It’s clear that changes are afoot in the BCB, and as we’ve discussed, these changes could either pose challenges or present opportunities for growth in Bangladeshi cricket. Thank you for joining us.
Dr. Malik: Thank you for having me. It’s been a pleasure discussing these important topics with you.