The streaming application offers the national championship matches at a lower cost than the official broadcast.
Last Sunday LigaPro publicly began its war against piracy, mainly against the MagisTV platform. Because, according to President Miguel Ángel Loor, this affects the income of the national teams. Since this prevents users from paying to watch the LigaPro with the platform that, in turn, pays for the rights to the national tournament (Star+).
«Against piracy and for legal football. No to Magis TV”, said one of the posters that Barcelona carried prior to its duel with Imbabura. “No to piracy for legal football,” was another that was seen on the lawn of Banco Pichincha.
The question that immediately arose is: What is MagisTV? It is an application that offers access to more than 1,200 live channels, 10,000 series and movies, sporting events and more. In addition, it allows unlimited access to all platforms, including Star+, so users can watch LigaPro matches.
The problem is that this service does not pay any type of fee to transmit everything it offers, so it falls into the category of piracy.. But people prefer it since its cost is much lower than Netflix, Amazon Prime, among others.
Magis TV is an application that can be downloaded for free, but not through the official Android and Apple stores (Play Store and App Store), but through a web page installer. However, to use it you need a username and password, which is what is sold in our country.
As Diario Olé learned, In Ecuador, the service of a user is offered on Magis TV for 9 dollars per month, 3 months for 25 dollars, 6 months for 50 (and one month free) and 12 months 90 (plus two months free).
If you hire the one of the year, The monthly payment comes out to a little more than six dollars.. Which is a big difference compared to the 12.59 dollars per month that it costs to contract Star+, while annually it is $104.99 (8.74 per month).
But, since it is not regulated by anyone, nor pays the rights to what it transmits, Magis TV is illegal. Furthermore, using it opens the door to thousands of viruses that can affect the devices where it is installed.
Loor’s complaint in court
That is why this Monday through a letter on his social networks, of which he is very active, Miguel Ángel Loor reported that he filed a complaint against this service. There he requested that all those who sell or buy illegal content be punished by law, both in the Serie A and Serie B tournaments, which will begin on March 13 and broadcast three matches per date.
«The respective complaints have been presented to the Prosecutor’s Office, Arcotel and Senadi. The only way to take care of the clubs’ product is to directly combat the problem. Anyone who distributes or purchases illegal content must be punished. Say no to piracy,” Loor wrote on the social network X (formerly Twitter).
Source: OLÈ Newspaper
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Streaming Expert
Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re diving into a pressing issue in the world of sports broadcasting: the clash between LigaPro and the piracy platform MagisTV. We’re joined by streaming expert Dr. Elena Ramirez, who has been studying the impacts of illegal streaming services on both the media industry and consumer behavior. Welcome, Dr. Ramirez!
Dr. Elena Ramirez: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s jump right into it. LigaPro recently took a bold stance against piracy by targeting MagisTV, which claims to offer a vast array of channels and content, including LigaPro matches, at a fraction of the price. What’s the main issue here?
Dr. Ramirez: The core issue is that MagisTV operates without any licensing or fees, effectively undermining legitimate broadcasters. LigaPro, which partners with Star+ for official broadcasts, is directly impacted because revenue from these rights is crucial for sustaining the leagues and national teams. When viewers opt for the cheaper, illegal alternative, it hurts everyone from players to teams and ultimately the quality of the sport itself.
Editor: It seems like a classic case of the struggle between affordability for consumers and the sustainability of sports broadcasting. What do you think drives users towards services like MagisTV, despite the legal risks?
Dr. Ramirez: It’s primarily cost. Services like MagisTV offer packages that can be as low as $6 a month if you subscribe for a year, which is significantly cheaper than legally licensed platforms. This appeal is magnified in regions where consumers may not have the disposable income for premium streaming services. Additionally, piracy becomes attractive when it includes easy access to diverse content, from live sports to countless movies and series.
Editor: That’s a great point. We even see that MagisTV is accessible for free, although not through regular app stores. Is this an indication that users are trying to circumvent the system while still wanting access to legal content?
Dr. Ramirez: Exactly. While there’s a distinct demand for premium content, people often feel priced out of legitimate options. By circumventing official app stores and utilizing workarounds, users believe they’re accessing content affordably while overlooking the legal implications. It’s a complicated balance between consumer desire and ethical consumption.
Editor: LigaPro’s initiative with posters stating, “No to piracy for legal football,” suggests a drive to rally public support. How effective do you think public awareness campaigns can be in this fight?
Dr. Ramirez: Public awareness campaigns can be impactful, especially when they resonate with fans’ loyalty to their teams. By framing piracy as a threat to the sport they love, these campaigns can create a sense of community responsibility among fans. However, it also requires education about the long-term consequences of supporting these illegal platforms. Fans must understand that the financial health of their teams relies on legally generated revenue.
Editor: It sounds like a multifaceted approach is necessary. What steps do you believe broadcasters and leagues should take to combat the popularity of these illegal platforms?
Dr. Ramirez: Broadcasters need to enhance their offerings—this includes not just pricing but also user experience. Making legal content more accessible, improving streaming quality, and offering flexible subscription plans can draw viewers back. Partnering with firms to promote legal options and making them available on multiple devices will also play a key role. Furthermore, legal actions against piracy need to be complemented with strategic marketing campaigns that highlight the value of legitimate content.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Ramirez, for your insights today. It seems that while piracy may be appealing due to its lower costs, the fight against it requires a combination of consumer education, improvements to legal offerings, and community engagement.
Dr. Ramirez: Absolutely! It’s a tough battle, but with the right approach, change is possible. Thank you for having me!
Editor: It was a pleasure. This conversation highlights the ongoing battle between legality and accessibility in the world of streaming. Thank you for tuning in to Time.news!