(24News) Mufti Abdul Qavi, who slapped Harim Shah and gave controversial statements, has issued another unbelievable statement.
According to the details, Mufti Abdul Qavi discussed with 24 News anchor Majaab Ali about the recent viral video of Tik Talkers and said that the people who made this video are more deserving of punishment than the people who made this video. Sharing the videos, Nazee videos of Manahil Malik and Tak Takramsha Rehman are currently viral on social media, on this Mufti Abdul Qavi has stated that it is a sin to expose someone’s nazee video. But promoting this video and sharing it with your friends is a bigger sin and such people should be punished more severely than the characters who made the video.
Further strengthening his position, Mufti Qavi said that the rights of the servants will be asked more than the rights of Allah. He kills the right of the person for whom he is responsible, and Allah will not forgive the rights of the servants until the servant forgives himself.
Mufti Qavi justified watching dirty videos once and said that if it is seen at first sight, it is allowed in Sharia and if you start watching it for pleasure, it is a sin. Meanwhile, the anchor Mufti Qavi Mufti Qavi said that the videos come from different countries of the world through WhatsApp group and he is a member of about 300 such groups in which such content comes. of presence in Regarding this, he said that since he is a public figure and the only Mufti to discuss such issues, he has to stay up-to-date with such things.
The anchor asked him whether he views or deletes obscene content in this group, to which Mufti Qavi replied that he sees it once because people ask about it. It was also revealed in the interview that when Manahil Malik’s video was leaked on TikTok, at that time, Manahil Malik was in Dubai and I was also there, and Manahil Malik had also discussed the matter over the phone with him. But I advised him to seek forgiveness from Allah and repent from such action again.
Also read: Ibrahim Ali and Palak Tiwari started growing close, fans speculated
var fb_code_executed = false; window.addEventListener(“scroll”, function () { if (fb_code_executed == false; { if (document.body.scrollTop > 20 || document.documentElement.scrollTop > 20) { fb_code_executed = true; window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId : 407891057136918, autoLogAppEvents : true, xfbml : true, version : “v18.0″ }); FB.AppEvents.logPageView(); }; (function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = ” fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, “script”, “facebook-jssdk”)); }}});
How does sharing explicit content on platforms like TikTok affect public morality and individual accountability?
Interview: The Ethical Implications of Viral Content and Public Morality
Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome everyone to this exclusive interview on the rising debates surrounding social media ethics and accountability. Today, we’re joined by Dr. Sara Ahmed, a sociologist and expert in digital ethics. Dr. Ahmed, thank you for being with us.
Dr. Sara Ahmed (DSA): Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss such pressing issues.
TNE: Recently, Mufti Abdul Qavi made headlines with his controversial statements regarding a viral TikTok video that featured two personalities, Manahil Malik and Tak Takramsha Rehman. He suggested that those who share such videos are more deserving of punishment than the individuals featured in them. What are your thoughts on this viewpoint?
DSA: Mufti Qavi’s perspective certainly raises significant ethical questions. He’s highlighting a crucial aspect of digital culture – that the act of sharing content carries its own moral weight. In the age of social media, sharing can be just as damaging, if not more so, than the original creation of the content.
TNE: He went on to say that exposing someone’s private video is a sin, but sharing and promoting it is an even bigger sin. How does this reflect on our responsibilities as consumers of content?
DSA: This reflects a growing realization that digital consumers have responsibilities beyond mere consumption. When we engage with content, especially controversial or sensitive material, we must consider the potential harm it might cause. Sharing such material can perpetuate harm, especially against those who did not consent to their images being shared.
TNE: Mufti Qavi also stated that “the rights of the servants will be asked more than the rights of Allah.” This touches on the concept of accountability toward one another. How does that translate in today’s social media landscape?
DSA: This statement emphasizes interpersonal rights and accountability, which is so often overlooked in the digital realm. In many ways, social media can create a disconnect, allowing users to act without considering the real-life consequences of their actions on others. When we prioritize views and engagements over dignity and respect for individuals, we are failing our social responsibilities.
TNE: He also made a rather controversial comment regarding viewing explicit content. He justified it by saying that watching such content is permissible if it’s merely fleeting. What is your take on this justification from an ethical perspective?
DSA: This justification points to a broader discussion about how we engage with explicit content. While many religious and ethical frameworks allow for a degree of leniency, it is imperative to ask ourselves why we are drawn to such content and the implications of that engagement. It’s important to promote a culture of respect and consent over casual consumption.
TNE: Lastly, Mufti Qavi mentioned being a part of numerous WhatsApp groups sharing this kind of explicit material. How does this kind of group culture influence the normalization of explicit content?
DSA: The proliferation of such groups creates an environment where sharing explicit content becomes normalized and even trivialized. It desensitizes individuals to the seriousness of privacy violations and cultivates a culture where people might disregard the dignity of others. Social accountability should bring attention to these issues, encouraging users to think critically about the content they consume and circulate.
TNE: Dr. Ahmed, your insights shed light on the need for a more ethical approach to our digital interactions. Thank you for joining us today and for sharing your expertise on such an important topic.
DSA: Thank you, it’s been a great discussion. I hope it encourages more individuals to think about their digital footprint and the impacts of their online choices.
TNE: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Let’s continue this important conversation about ethics in the digital age.