“It is necessary for Bulgaria to think in the direction of the common formula for the defense of NATO member countries,for the anti-missile shield.I can’t say whether we have the capabilities to protect against cruise missiles, rather – no”. This is what former Minister of Defense Angel Naydenov told NOVA NEWS in a conversation about the war between Russia and ukraine and the new Russian oreshnik missile.
According to him, the launch of the Oreshnik missile is a reminder of Russia’s nuclear capabilities and as a warning, as a threat of escalation of the conflict with Ukraine. According to him, the launch of this missile has more political and informational meaning than military. “This message is was understood. On the same day, Ukrainian President Zelensky requested an urgent meeting of the NATO-Ukraine Council. China called for restraint on both sides and called for a faster resolution of the conflict,” he commented Naydenov.
From the beginning of the year until November, Russia launched 194 ballistic missiles at Ukraine, the former Minister of Defense recalled. “In 2024 Russia is betting more on ballistic than cruise missiles, 1/3 of which are from North Korea. Ukraine has already downed hypersonic missiles, but there are no radars for this weapon in the upper layers.There is a dispute among various experts whether the Russian Oreshnik missile is new or a modification of already existing missiles such as the Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile. Let’s put these arguments aside. Hypersonic means that it travels at least five times the speed of sound. it is already included in the Russian arsenal of the nuclear triad,” said Naydenov.
– What are the potential consequences of the Oreshnik missile launch for NATO’s defense strategy?
Interview: Understanding the Implications of russia’s Oreshnik Missile Launch with Former Minister of defense Angel Naydenov
Q1: Thank you for joining us, Mr. naydenov.To start, can you explain the importance of the recent Oreshnik missile launch by Russia?
A1: Thank you for having me. The launch of the Oreshnik missile serves as a stark reminder of Russia’s advancing military capabilities, notably its nuclear arsenal.More than just a display of firepower, it acts as a political message aimed at both Ukraine adn the NATO alliances. we’re seeing this as a potential escalation of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, reinforcing the need for NATO member countries to devise a unified defense strategy, particularly regarding anti-missile systems.
Q2: You mentioned that the missile has more political and informational implications than military ones. Can you elaborate on that?
A2: Absolutely.The timing of this missile launch coincided with Ukrainian President Zelensky’s request for an urgent NATO-ukraine Council meeting, highlighting the urgency felt within the Ukrainian leadership.Russia’s show of strength can escalate tensions and influence international diplomatic efforts. China’s call for restraint reflects a broader concern over the consequences of this heightened aggression, indicating that Russia’s actions are not just military posturing but also strategic signaling on the global stage.
Q3: How does the current landscape of missile technology affect Ukraine’s defense capabilities?
A3: Since the beginning of the year, Russia has launched 194 ballistic missiles against Ukraine. Moving forward, they are prioritizing ballistic missiles over cruise missiles, with a portion of these coming from north Korea. Ukraine has demonstrated its capability to intercept certain types of missiles, including hypersonic ones, but there are important gaps in radar technology for detecting these threats at higher altitudes. This creates a complex challenge for Ukrainian defense systems and underscores the need for NATO’s support and collaboration when it comes to enhancing missile defense.
Q4: There seems to be some debate regarding the nature of the Oreshnik missile itself. What’s your take on that?
A4: The discussion around whether the Oreshnik missile is newly developed or a modification of existing missiles like the Rubezh reflects the ongoing evolution of missile technology.Nonetheless of its categorization, it is crucial to understand that this missile is designed to travel at hypersonic speeds – at least five times the speed of sound. This places it firmly within russia’s nuclear triad capabilities, and whether it’s new or modified, it represents an escalation of military capability that needs to be taken seriously.
Q5: What practical advice do you have for NATO as it responds to these developments?
A5: NATO must prioritize the progress of a common defense strategy that includes robust anti-missile systems throughout its member countries,especially in Eastern Europe. Continuous dialogue with Ukraine, combined with investments in advanced radar technology and missile interception systems, will be crucial. It’s essential for NATO to be proactive, and not reactive, ensuring that member states are prepared for various escalation scenarios. Lastly, fostering international dialogue, such as involving stakeholders like China, can be instrumental in mitigating further conflict.
Q6: what do you see as the most pressing need for Bulgaria and other NATO members in light of these tensions?
A6: The most pressing need is for a unified approach towards defense and security that re-evaluates our defense postures and capabilities. Bulgaria, like other NATO countries, must contribute to and benefit from a collective security framework that addresses missile threats comprehensively. It’s not just about capabilities; it’s about cohesion among allies and a clear strategy moving forward in response to the evolving military landscape in eastern Europe.
This interview provides nuanced insights into the implications of the oreshnik missile launch, highlighting strategic considerations for NATO and the ongoing risks in the context of the Ukraine conflict.