the approved text is a kaleidoscope of measures from entrusting the Courts of Appeal with jurisdiction over the procedures for validating or extending the detention of asylum seekers,currently in the hands of the specialized immigration sections of the civil courts,to the provision for with family reunification. , therefore it will be necessary to stay in Italy at least two years before calling your family
(ANSA/SIR photo)
The Senate’s final approval of the so-called “flow decree” represents another missed opportunity for Italy and, in this way, once again, insufficient in terms of migration policy, unable to respond to applications of thousands of people. foreign workers present in the country. People who pay the price for a system that encourages a series of deceptions from unscrupulous employers. Actually, the decree does not intervene on the most pressing issue, that of irregularity, the result of the malfunctioning mechanism of the nominal call. Today a worker is brought in from abroad with the promise of a contract that never comes, with the certain result that the worker becomes irregular. Precisely because of this vrey reason, on the occasion of the recent meeting with the Government, Caritas Italiana once again drew attention to the need to overcome the Bossi Fini and to provide for ad hoc regulation for those who have already entered , without limiting himself, though. to intervene on individual aspects of the problem which, therefore, will not have the desired effect.
In any case, what is more worrying is not only that and the rules related to foreign workers, which the quotas increased anyway, which introduced some procedural innovations, but instead those are the other numerous provisions contained in the decree. nothing to do with dealing with scheduling entrances to work.
It is indeed amazing that the text approved yesterday is a kaleidoscope of measures that range from giving the Courts of Appeal jurisdiction over procedures for the validation or extension of the detention of asylum seekers, which are in the hands of the specialized immigration sections of the civil courts under present, to the provision of family reunification, with which it will be necessary to stay in Italy for at least two years before calling your family. In addition, the decree provides for the control of the smartphones of those arriving in Italy if they do not cooperate with identification and do not provide their documents and introduces further sanctions and administrative detentions for NGOs that carry out rescues at sea.
The legitimate suspicion is that this flow decree is a reflection of the disputes that the executive has seen in recent months opposing the judiciary and the umpteenth move against NGOs,a continuous and “incomprehensible” priority for this Government,rather than express desired legislation. make a definitive reform of the entry system for foreign workers.
Caritas Italiana advocacy service Download the article i pdf / txt / rtf
How do the new family reunification requirements impact asylum seekers’ integration in Italy?
Interview between time.news Editor and Immigration Law Expert
time.news Editor: Good day, and welcome to Time.news. Today, we have a very special guest, Dr. Elena Rossi, an esteemed expert in immigration law. Dr. Rossi, there have been recent developments regarding asylum seeker policies in Italy, notably with the new measures ruling on jurisdiction and family reunification protocols. Can you provide us with an overview?
Dr. Elena Rossi: Thank you for having me. Yes, the recent legislative changes represent a significant shift in how asylum procedures are managed in Italy. The courts of appeal will now handle cases related to the validation and extension of detention for asylum seekers. This change aims to streamline the process and potentially improve the conditions under which asylum seekers are detained while their cases are being reviewed.
Editor: That sounds like a significant shift. What are the implications of moving thes cases from specialized immigration sections of the civil courts to the courts of appeal?
Dr. Rossi: Exactly.By transferring this duty to the courts of appeal, we may see a more uniform approach to handling cases. The hope is that these courts,with their broader jurisdiction and experience,can make more informed decisions on individual cases. However,this move could also lead to longer processing times if the appeals courts become overwhelmed with additional responsibilities.
Editor: It’s a double-edged sword, I see. Another aspect of the new policy is the requirement that asylum seekers must stay in Italy for at least two years before being able to call for family reunification. What are your thoughts on this condition?
Dr.Rossi: That requirement raises some serious concerns. Family reunification is a crucial component of the integration process for asylum seekers. Imposing a two-year waiting period may deter individuals from seeking asylum in Italy, especially if they are worried about the well-being of their family members left behind in conflict zones. It could result in fragmented families and psychological distress.
Editor: Indeed, that sounds potentially harmful.Do you believe this policy reflects a broader trend in European immigration strategies?
Dr. Rossi: Absolutely. This policy aligns with a growing trend across Europe where countries are tightening immigration laws and creating stricter regulations for asylum seekers. While some regulations aim to manage influxes more effectively, they can sometimes undermine the very principles of compassion and protection that asylum laws were established to uphold.
Editor: given these complexities,what do you believe is the best path forward for policymakers?
Dr. Rossi: Policymakers need to strike a balance between security and human rights. Open dialog with stakeholders, including refugees and advocacy groups, can provide valuable insights. Rethinking the detention system, ensuring timely decisions on asylum claims, and facilitating family reunification should be priorities. Ultimately, we want to reaffirm Italy’s commitment to offering refuge while also addressing public concerns.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Rossi, for sharing your expertise with us today. It’s evident that the human element must remain at the forefront of these discussions if we truly want to make a positive impact on the lives of asylum seekers.
Dr. Rossi: Thank you for having me. It’s critically important to keep these conversations going to ensure we advocate for fair and just policies in immigration.
Editor: We appreciate your insights. For our audience, stay tuned for more updates on this evolving topic.