FAJAR.CO.ID, MAKASSAR — Mario david as Daily Chair of Sehati in the Makassar pilwali, does not accept being accused of being the cause of the defeat of Pair number 2, Andi Seto Gadhista Asapa and Rezki Mulfiati Lutfi (SEHATI) which was spread on TikTok social media via the account @ militant at heart. He has also reported it to the Makassar Police.
“I object to this viral incident on social media, defamation and character assassination. “I reported it to the Makassar police,” said Mario David Friday evening (29/11/2024)
In a post on the TikTok account @militansehati, he accused Mario of being responsible for the defeat of the pair of one heart in the makassar election.
In the election which took place on November 27, the 2024 Makassar Pilwalkot pair Munafri Arifuddin-Aliyah Mustika Ilham (MULIA) was ahead of thier rivals. Based on fast count results from various survey institutions, the Mulia couple succeeded in leading with a vote acquisition of more than 55%.
Meanwhile, the other candidate pairs are Andi Seto Gadhista Asapa-Rezki mulfiati Lutfi (SEHATI), Indira Yusuf Ismail-Ilham Ari Fauzi (INIMI), and Amri Arsyid-Abdul Rahman Bando (AMAN). (Ikbal/Fajar)
– What should candidates do to combat misinformation on social media during elections?
Interview with Political Expert on Social Media Impact in Elections: Analyzing the Makassar Pilwalkot IncidentTime.news Editor: Thank you for joining us today. We want to discuss a recent event in the Makassar Pilwalkot election, specifically the accusations against Mario David following the defeat of Pair Number 2, Andi Seto Gadhista Asapa and Rezki Mulfiati Lutfi. Can you explain the situation and its implications?
Expert: Certainly.In the latest Makassar pilwalkot elections held on November 27, the pair Munafri Arifuddin-Aliyah Mustika Ilham, referred to as MULIA, gained notable traction, securing over 55% of the votes according to fast count results.Following this outcome, Mario David, the Daily Chair of the Sehati faction, faced accusations on social media—specifically from a TikTok account, @militansehati. The account alleged that he was responsible for the defeat of his faction.
Time.news Editor: What are the potential implications of spreading such accusations on social media?
Expert: the implications can be quite severe. Accusations of this nature can harm reputations, distort public perception, and even influence future elections.In this case,Mario David responded promptly by reporting the incident to the Makassar police for defamation and character assassination. The rapid spread of misinformation through platforms like TikTok highlights the power and potential harm of social media in electoral politics.
Time.news Editor: How does this incident reflect broader trends in political communication and campaigning?
Expert: This event illustrates a key trend: the growing role of social media as a platform for political discourse. Candidate campaigns increasingly rely on digital strategies to connect with voters, but it also opens the door for misinformation and smear campaigns. Politicians need to be aware of this landscape—they must not only craft their narratives but also be prepared to counter any false narratives that emerge.
Time.news Editor: What practical advice would you give to political candidates regarding their online presence given situations like this?
Expert: Candidates should maintain a proactive online presence by engaging authentically with their audience. This includes clarifying their positions, addressing rumors immediately, and even taking legal action, as Mario David did. It’s also crucial for campaigns to monitor social media for any emerging narratives—both positive and negative. Understanding the impact of these narratives can help candidates respond more effectively.
Time.news Editor: Lastly, what should voters be aware of when consuming information on social media related to elections?
Expert: Voters must approach information on social media critically. They should verify facts from credible sources before forming opinions or making decisions based on viral content. It’s essential to understand the provenance of information and the motives behind its dissemination, especially during election seasons when misinformation can surge.
Time.news Editor: Thank you for your insights. This discussion on the intersection of social media and electoral politics is indeed crucial,especially in turbulent times like this.
Expert: Thank you for having me. It’s vital we continue these conversations as digital platforms evolve and shape our political landscape.