Baghdad – IA
The head of the National Wisdom Movement, Mr. Ammar al-Hakim, confirmed that amending the election law was not discussed in the coordination framework meetings.
Mr. Al-Hakim said in a statement received by the (INA), that he “attended the Iraqi House Salon and met a group of national elites and competencies, pointing out Iraq’s status, history, and influential figures in it.”
He stated that “the coordination framework is a gathering of political forces in one political arena and a specific audience and voters, and that it provided what alliances and coalitions could not provide, and it was a major nucleus in the formation of the state administration coalition. We also indicated tangible progress in implementing the political agreement.”
He pointed out that “Iraq has so far proven its ability to manage balances,” stressing the importance of preserving them and recalling historical aspects when reading the balance and what things turned out to be when the external balance was disturbed.
He continued, “The talk about amending the election law was not discussed in the framework meetings, and all that is presented are differing opinions about the file,” stressing the need to emphasize that government success is the result of everyone’s movement and efforts.
He stressed that “the current law has proven its effectiveness and its ability to maintain balance.”
He went on to say: “With regard to the vision of the political forces for the form of the state,” indicating that “the constitution defined the features and foundations of the state, and the disagreement of some with these images and their foundations does not mean canceling them, and whoever wants to give priority to his vision must amend the constitution and hold a people’s referendum on it.”
He called for accepting the nature of the parliamentary system and its requirements, indicating that “electing a specific party in the parliamentary system does not mean its accession to power. He also called for preserving the social balance and the weights of the components.”
He stressed that “the doors of the coordination framework and the political process are open to accommodate everyone,” pointing out that “the coordination framework launched many messages, not the least of which is the local elections, to accommodate the objecting or absent parties.”
He stressed the necessity of preserving the rules of political action, and explained that the disagreement over a number of governors was a systematic disagreement, also pointing out that the presence of more than 180 parties is an unhealthy situation, as we called for greater integration. We also emphasized respect for privacy and freedom of expression, provided that it does not lead to Breaking others down and abusing them. We also demonstrated the importance of supporting allegations with evidence.